The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 访客留言软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #20 2 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 6 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #18 3 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #21 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 | #26 2 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #30 1 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #26 3 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #23 1 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | #12 9 条评价 | — |
Choosing between D3x AI by d3x and Quiq by Quiq hinges on the core needs of your hotel’s guest communication. Both aim to streamline engagement, but D3x specializes in AI-powered messaging that automates responses across multiple channels, while Quiq focuses on mobile messaging to improve direct customer interactions. Your decision should depend on whether you want an AI-driven assistant or a more straightforward messaging platform.
While D3x boasts a higher number of reviews and more recent feedback, Quiq’s market presence is limited to the US, with no recent reviews. Does your hotel need a scalable AI solution or a simple, effective messaging tool? Let’s compare these two options.
D3x offers a suite of 34 features designed for automation, integration, and multi-channel messaging, making it ideal if your hotel aims to automate routine inquiries and improve operational efficiency. Quiq, on the other hand, provides core messaging capabilities via SMS, Facebook Messenger, Live Chat, and Kik, focusing on direct communication but with no listed features beyond that.
D3x’s ratings reflect a highly-rated ease of use (4.86/5) and excellent customer support (5/5), backed by 14 reviews, six of which are recent. Quiq, with no reviews or ratings, lacks recent feedback to support its claims. Would you prefer a proven, highly-rated platform with extensive features? Or are you comfortable with an unreviewed, basic messaging tool? The choice is clear.
If your hotel needs a robust guest engagement solution with extensive automation, integrations, and analytics, go with D3x. Its feature set includes chatbots, automated workflows, guest history, sentiment analysis, and multi-property management, making it suitable for hotels seeking operational efficiency and personalized communication.
If your team primarily wants to upgrade from traditional email or phone interactions with a simple messaging interface, Quiq might suffice. However, without recent reviews or detailed feature comparisons, its capabilities remain unverified. For most hotels aiming for scalable, proven technology, D3x is the safer pick.
D3x’s user ratings show an impressive 4.86/5 for ease of use, with onboarding rated similarly high at 4.86/5. Users describe it as straightforward, user-friendly, and easy to adopt, with ongoing improvements and a smooth setup process.
Quiq provides no recent reviews or ratings to compare, making it impossible to determine its usability. Given D3x’s proven high rating and positive feedback, it’s clear your team will find D3x easier to implement and operate. Edge: D3x.
D3x stands out with 34 unique features, including message routing, chatbots, automated replies, guest surveys, sentiment analysis, and integrations with platforms like Slack, Facebook Messenger, and WhatsApp. These capabilities allow for comprehensive automation and detailed guest insights.
Quiq offers core messaging functions via SMS, Facebook Messenger, Live Chat, and Kik but has no listed features beyond basic communication. D3x’s extensive feature set provides more tools for personalized, automated engagement. Edge: D3x.
D3x’s support ratings are perfect, with a 5/5 rating and reviews praising its quick, helpful assistance. Reviewers highlight the team’s responsiveness and ongoing support during onboarding and beyond.
Quiq has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its customer support quality unverified. Given D3x’s demonstrated support excellence, your team is more likely to receive timely, effective assistance. Edge: D3x.
D3x integrates with eight verified partners, including Mews, Oracle Hospitality, Cloudbeds, and LIKE MAGIC, ensuring your existing systems can connect smoothly. Quiq currently offers no verified integrations, which may limit its ability to connect with your current property management or CRM systems.
For hotels seeking seamless integration with their existing tech stack, D3x provides more confidence and flexibility. Edge: D3x.
D3x’s review count (14) and recent feedback—six reviews in the last six months—indicate active user engagement. Its hotels, especially hostels (33%) and boutique hotels (7%), value its automation and efficiency, reflected in a net promoter score of 9.71/5.
Quiq has no reviews or ratings, so there’s no user feedback to consider. Based on current data, D3x emerges as the better-rated solution. Edge: D3x.
D3x charges a base price of $500 monthly, with no freemium, flat, or per-room pricing options listed. No pricing details are available for Quiq, indicating that its costs are possibly customized or undisclosed.
Given the transparent pricing for D3x, your team can evaluate ROI more confidently. Without clear pricing for Quiq, D3x’s cost structure provides a better basis for decision-making.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, low-cost messaging solution without automation or integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel needs automation, detailed analytics, or integrations beyond basic messaging.
D3x stands out as the more established, feature-rich, and highly-rated guest messaging platform backed by recent, positive reviews. Its extensive automation, integrations, and support make it suitable for hotels aiming for operational efficiency and personalized engagement.
Quiq offers a simple, mobile-focused messaging approach ideal for hotels that want to upgrade their basic communication channels without extensive automation or integrations. However, the lack of recent reviews makes its effectiveness unverified.
If your hotel values a proven, comprehensive platform, D3x is the clear choice. For hotels seeking a minimal, straightforward messaging tool, Quiq might suffice, but due diligence is recommended given sparse recent feedback.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
统一收件箱
|
|
|
| 团队消息传递 | ||
| 广播消息 | ||
| 桌面应用程序(非基于网络) | ||
| 共享照片 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 移动友好 | ||
| 实时翻译 | ||
| 在线聊天网站 | ||
|
▾
多渠道
|
|
|
| Whatsapp 整合 | ||
| Facebook 信使集成 | ||
| 短信短信 | ||
| 在线聊天网站 | ||
|
▾
自动化
|
|
|
| 消息路由 | ||
| 自动回复 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 广播消息 | ||
| 追加销售履行追踪 | ||
| 开放式 API | ||
| 自动化工作流程 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和辅助
|
|
|
| 追加销售市场 | ||
| 优惠活动 | ||
| 追加销售履行追踪 | ||
| 购买链接 | ||
| 向 Folio 收费 | ||
| 客房升级活动 | ||
| 追加销售活动 | ||
|
▾
任务管理
|
|
|
| 票务系统 | ||
| 任务和清单 | ||
| 检查 | ||
| 重复任务 | ||
| 追加销售履行追踪 | ||
|
▾
调查和反馈
|
|
|
| 消息客人调查 | ||
| TripAdvisor 评论合作伙伴 | ||
| 宾客点评活动 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 客人历史 | ||
| 追加销售履行追踪 | ||
| 团队 KPI 仪表板 | ||
| 自定义目标设定 | ||
|
▾
合规与隐私
|
|
|
| 自动选择加入/同意收集 | ||
| 安全数据保护 | ||
| 开放式 API | ||
|
▾
Digital Registration & Check-in
|
|
|
| 文件和护照扫描 | ||
| 信用卡授权 | ||
| 移动钥匙 | ||
| 自定义字段 | ||
|
▾
入住前
|
|
|
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 预订恢复活动 | ||
| 行为营销活动 | ||
| 发送电子邮件至聊天机器人自动化 | ||
| 顺利交接给人工客服 | ||
| 点击呼叫 | ||
| 潜在客户资格 | ||
| OTA价格比较 | ||
| 界面个性化 | ||
|
▾
入住和入住后
|
|
|
| 数字化办理登机手续 | ||
| 客房升级活动 | ||
| 追加销售活动 | ||
| 自动化工作流程 | ||
| 自定义路由和升级 | ||
| 预编程的客人通知 | ||
| 宾客点评活动 | ||
| 留存活动 | ||
|
▾
后台
|
|
|
| 统一全渠道收件箱 | ||
| 收件箱导航中的状态选项卡 | ||
| 指派代理 | ||
| 预设回复 | ||
| 用户配置文件自定义 | ||
| 多物业管理 | ||
| 可定制的工作时间 | ||
| 无限用户 | ||
|
▾
人工智能
|
|
|
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 情绪分析 | ||
| 自学 NLP | ||
| 句法和语义分析 | ||
| 行为分析 | ||
| 客户分析 | ||
| 预测与预报 |
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。D3x AI 和 Quiq 共享许多核心 Guest Messaging Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。D3x AI 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Quiq 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。D3x AI 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
D3x AI:否。Quiq:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Guest Messaging Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。d3x 的 HT Score 为 0,Quiq 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案