项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 266 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
dailypoint™ 在支持、入职和培训方面表现出色,尤其适合机场与会议住宿设施(4.6/5),并拥有营销自动化以及客人反馈模块(评论卡/评论)等独家功能。
Thynk 在销售和收入可见性方面表现出色,尤其适合民宿住宿设施(4.9/5)。
基于 HTR 上 266 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $600/月 | 起价 $500/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 231 | 35 |
在分析了 266 条经验证的评价后,dailypoint™ 用户最看重其 支持、入职和培训, 分析、报告与可行的洞察, 宾客画像与数据丰富,而 Thynk 用户则强调 销售和收入可见性, 分析、仪表盘和报告, 汇率与合同灵活性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持、入职和培训
▾
|
+
销售和收入可见性
▾
|
|
+
分析、报告与可行的洞察
▾
|
+
分析、仪表盘和报告
▾
|
|
+
宾客画像与数据丰富
▾
|
+
汇率与合同灵活性
▾
|
|
+
集成与一体化平台工作流程
▾
|
+
集中管理的客人和销售数据
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
设计与编辑限制
▾
|
−
可用性与导航
▾
|
|
−
复杂性与学习曲线
▾
|
−
性能速度和模块加载
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店CRM与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | #21 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 138 条评价 | #14 13 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 41 条评价 | #10 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 18 条评价 | #8 5 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 110 条评价 | #14 13 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #1 137 条评价 | #11 16 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #1 74 条评价 | #18 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 13 条评价 | #9 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 1 条评价 | #10 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 199 条评价 | #14 16 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | #10 2 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 15 条评价 | #3 4 条评价 |
dailypoint™ and Thynk both address the core challenge hotels face: unifying guest data to personalize marketing and improve guest engagement. They each centralize customer information and automate communication across the guest journey, aiming to boost direct bookings and loyalty. However, dailypoint™ excels at complex data management and deep segmentation for larger or multi-property groups, while Thynk prioritizes ease of use and straightforward CRM workflows better suited for smaller properties or sales-focused teams.
Both products solve the problem of fragmented guest data by integrating multiple systems, but dailypoint™’s 200+ system integrations and advanced data cleansing provide a more robust foundation for personalized marketing. Thynk’s strength lies in syncing guest and business data directly with inboxes and calendars to streamline day-to-day operational tasks. The choice depends heavily on the hotel's size, complexity, and whether deep data analytics or operational simplicity is the priority.
If you operate a medium to large hotel group with a complex tech stack across multiple brands or properties, dailypoint™ is the better fit. Its 231 verified reviews, including 13 recent ones with a 4.8/5 rating, indicate strong satisfaction in handling large-scale data centralization, segmentation, and loyalty programs. Hotels like Rotana and Serena use dailypoint™ to unify guest profiles from over 200 data sources, enabling precise marketing automation and loyalty management across multiple touchpoints.
Conversely, if you run a smaller or independent hotel, especially one focused on sales and direct guest interaction, Thynk’s Salesforce-backed CRM offers an easier onboarding experience and user-friendly interface, supported by 33 reviews and positive feedback on its integration with PMS and POS systems. Thynk is ideal if your hotel values straightforward synchronization with calendars and inboxes and needs a CRM that enhances sales pipeline management without extensive data complexity. However, Thynk’s smaller review base and fewer integrations suggest it is less tested in large or complex environments.
Thynk rates slightly higher in ease of use at 4.5/5 versus dailypoint™’s 4.3/5, with onboarding nearly even (4.3 vs. 4.4). Reviewers praise Thynk for its intuitive interface and quick staff adoption, highlighting that even non-technical team members can manage workflows and reporting effectively. One user cited the platform as a "game changer" for task management and automation, easing team collaboration.
dailypoint™, while powerful, presents a steeper learning curve due to its complexity and advanced features. Multiple reviewers note that onboarding and training take longer, with some requiring HTML knowledge for email campaign customization. Users mention that navigation and campaign design could be more user-friendly, though the system offers unmatched data depth once mastered.
Edge: Even.
dailypoint™ offers 20 unique hotel-centric features that Thynk lacks, including a centralized data warehouse, advanced segmentation options (attribute, geographic, channel/market, lead time, room type based), A/B testing, event-based automations, guest feedback modules, and compliance with CCPA and PCI standards. These features enable hotels to create highly targeted, automated marketing campaigns and manage loyalty programs with precision. The presence of a TripAdvisor connectivity partner and extensive campaign template options supports sophisticated marketing workflows.
Thynk does not list any unique features beyond the eight shared capabilities with dailypoint™. While its integration with Salesforce lends it powerful CRM fundamentals and user-friendly customization, it lacks dailypoint™’s specialized segmentation and loyalty tools that drive revenue through personalized guest engagement.
Edge: dailypoint™.
Both products earn strong customer support and onboarding ratings: dailypoint™ at 4.6/5 for support and 4.4/5 for onboarding, Thynk at 4.4/5 and 4.3/5 respectively. dailypoint™ reviewers frequently commend the responsive ticketing system and collaborative approach to handling change requests, with several noting excellent guidance during implementation and ongoing support.
Thynk’s support team is described as responsive and professional, with users appreciating helpful training and setup assistance. Some users suggest room for more proactive advice but acknowledge timely issue resolution.
Edge: Even.
dailypoint™ has 64 verified partners, nearly five times the 13 verified by Thynk. Both share five common integrations including Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Planet, hconnect, and Stayntouch, covering major PMS and operational systems.
dailypoint™’s exclusive partners include hotelkit, Customer Alliance, HiJiffy, and Upsellguru, providing connectivity to guest engagement, reputation management, upselling, and operational workflow tools critical for hotels with complex tech ecosystems. Thynk’s unique integrations focus on sales and event management services like MeetingPackage, Sertifi by Flywire, and Cendyn.
Hotels seeking extensive third-party connectivity for comprehensive CRM, marketing, and loyalty workflows will benefit from dailypoint™’s broader integration network.
Edge: dailypoint™.
Both products hold a 4.4/5 overall rating, but dailypoint™’s rating is based on 231 reviews versus Thynk’s 33. dailypoint™’s recent 13 reviews over six months average 4.8/5, indicating improving satisfaction, while Thynk’s 6 recent reviews do not meet the threshold for a reliable recent rating.
dailypoint™ scores highest among branded hotels (4.5/5, 76 reviews), airport/conference hotels (4.6/5, 83 reviews), resorts (4.5/5, 97 reviews), and city center hotels (4.4/5, 63 reviews). Thynk performs well in boutique hotels (4.5/5, 13 reviews), airport/conference hotels (4.5/5, 16 reviews), and luxury hotels (4.4/5, 17 reviews) but with smaller sample sizes.
Given dailypoint™’s larger and more recent review volume with consistently high ratings across diverse segments, it is the more reliably rated solution currently.
Edge: Even.
dailypoint™ has a base price of $600 with no freemium, no monthly flat rate, no per-room pricing, and no implementation fee. There is no trial available.
Thynk charges a slightly lower base price of $500 with the same pricing structure—no freemium, monthly flat, per-room, implementation fees, or trial.
The pricing models are comparable with Thynk slightly less expensive at base price; however, the total cost may vary based on customization, integrations, and scale, neither product publishes detailed package tiers.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The fundamental difference between dailypoint™ and Thynk lies in their depth and complexity: dailypoint™ excels at comprehensive guest data centralization, advanced segmentation, and loyalty management for larger or multi-property hotels, while Thynk offers a user-friendly, sales-focused CRM ideal for smaller properties seeking streamlined operational workflows.
Choose dailypoint™ if your hotel or group requires robust data cleansing and integration from over 200 systems, highly granular segmentation (including geographic and room type), and an integrated loyalty module—all supported by 231 reviews with a 4.8/5 recent rating, indicating proven success in diverse settings including luxury and branded hotels.
Opt for Thynk if your priority is quick adoption, intuitive design, and seamless syncing with PMS and POS systems for sales and guest management, particularly for small to medium-sized hotels. While it has fewer features and integrations, its Salesforce backbone and positive user experience make it a reliable choice for straightforward CRM needs supported by 33 reviews.
The decision hinges on your hotel's scale, technical complexity, and marketing ambitions: dailypoint™ drives personalized marketing and loyalty at scale, whereas Thynk enhances daily operational efficiency and sales workflows with simpler CRM tools.
酒店CRM与电子邮件营销 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $600/月 | 起价 $500/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
营销自动化
|
|
|
| 个性化一对一沟通 | ||
| A/B 测试 | ||
| 营销自动化 | ||
| 电子邮件通讯 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
|
▾
模板生成器
|
|
|
| 模板编辑器 | ||
| 所见即所得 - HTML 编辑器 | ||
| 营销活动模板 | ||
| 事务模板 | ||
| 模板导入 | ||
|
▾
客人资料
|
|
|
| 客人资料 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| 符合CCPA | ||
| 自动重复数据删除 | ||
|
▾
分割
|
|
|
| 分割 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 标记 | ||
| 忠诚度细分 | ||
| 基于属性的细分 | ||
| 基于地理的细分 | ||
| 基于渠道/市场的细分 | ||
| 基于交付周期的细分 | ||
| 基于房间类型的细分 | ||
|
▾
隐私与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| 符合CCPA | ||
| PCI 投诉 | ||
|
▾
数据管理
|
|
|
| 集中式数据仓库 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 开放式 API | ||
| 集中式多酒店/多品牌解决方案 | ||
|
▾
反馈和调查
|
|
|
| 客人反馈模块(评论卡/评论) | ||
| Trip Advisor 连接合作伙伴 |
我们分析了 10 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"So, as you think about investing in Digital Hospitality, don‘t forget to think about what it might cost not to!"
"Co-Pilot has taken a lot of the manual data entry out of reservations, and Room Block Manager gives us a clear view of our groups. Both teams now play a real part in the sales proc..."
"We work with dailypoint because the integration between the Booking Manager module and our PMS works really well."
"We want to be flexible, dynamic, and fast while we continue being exceptional in the German conference market, offering customers a unique experience from inquiry to execution, and..."
"The decisive factor for selecting dailypoint was their wide experience in customer loyalty programs, their high standards in GDPR as well as their ability to connect partner system..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持在设置和日常使用过程中被反复描述为响应迅速、知识丰富且乐于助人。同时,也有用户指出平台较为复杂,入职培训和员工培训可能会耗费较多时间。
许多用户依赖Dailypoint的报告和分析来了解客人情绪、营销活动效果和战略机会。每周报告、准确的实时结果以及可衡量的互动被视为数据驱动决策和提升营销表现的重... 许多用户依赖Dailypoint的报告和分析来了解客人情绪、营销活动效果和战略机会。每周报告、准确的实时结果以及可衡量的互动被视为数据驱动决策和提升营销表现的重要因素。
评论者一致称赞 Dailypoint 通过集中管理宾客数据并从多个渠道丰富宾客兴趣、偏好和行为档案,建立了更坚实的个性化基础。酒店表示,这有助于提升宾客识别的准确... 评论者一致称赞 Dailypoint 通过集中管理宾客数据并从多个渠道丰富宾客兴趣、偏好和行为档案,建立了更坚实的个性化基础。酒店表示,这有助于提升宾客识别的准确性和相关性营销效果。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
反复被提及的批评是,新闻通讯和活动设计工具相比专业营销软件功能有限。用户希望拥有更现代、直观且灵活的布局控制,包括更好的视觉编辑和更便捷的排版方式。
多篇评论指出,Dailypoint 功能强大但不易上手,新用户需要较长的学习时间。客户提到需要HTML知识、复杂的定制,以及由于功能繁多可能让系统显得难以应对。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户表示,Thynk 提升了对业务表现、销售机会和商业趋势的可见性,帮助酒店做出更好的决策并发现收入潜力。对于酒店集团来说,这种可见性还包括比较各酒店的业绩... 用户表示,Thynk 提升了对业务表现、销售机会和商业趋势的可见性,帮助酒店做出更好的决策并发现收入潜力。对于酒店集团来说,这种可见性还包括比较各酒店的业绩以及跟踪销售工作的成效。
评论者认为Thynk的仪表盘和报告能够展示销售管道、账户产出、转化率、销售表现以及整体酒店趋势。分析被描述为清晰且有助于做出明智决策、比较业绩并更快识别收... 评论者认为Thynk的仪表盘和报告能够展示销售管道、账户产出、转化率、销售表现以及整体酒店趋势。分析被描述为清晰且有助于做出明智决策、比较业绩并更快识别收入机会。
一条评论强调了更简便的动态汇率处理需求,尤其是对于跨多个国家运营的酒店。同一用户还希望在制定合同和报价时拥有更好的比较工具,显示出国际酒店运营对更灵活... 一条评论强调了更简便的动态汇率处理需求,尤其是对于跨多个国家运营的酒店。同一用户还希望在制定合同和报价时拥有更好的比较工具,显示出国际酒店运营对更灵活商业设置的需求。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
部分用户认为平台的导航可以更简便,用户体验也能更友好。他们指出,简化界面和减少常用操作的步骤将提升员工效率并改善整体体验。
一位评论者特别指出需要提升不同系统模块的加载速度。这表明虽然该平台有用,但性能问题可能会拖慢日常工作,降低员工生产力。
排名更高的方面
这取决于您的需求。dailypoint™ CRM, CDM & Marketing 和 Thynk Hotel CRM 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。dailypoint™ CRM, CDM & Marketing 提供 65 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Thynk Hotel CRM 提供 13 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Thynk Hotel CRM 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
dailypoint™ CRM, CDM & Marketing:否。Thynk Hotel CRM:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。dailypoint™ 的 HT Score 为 98,Thynk 的为 82。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐