Datafast vs. ROH: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 69 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 69 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

datafast 表现出色 .

ROH 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Datafast 与 ROH 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 69 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
100
推荐可能性
0%
99%
易用性
0.0/5
5.0/5
客户支持
0.0/5
5.0/5
性价比
0.0/5
4.8/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $100/mo
经验证的评价 0 69

Datafast 与 ROH 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 69 条经验证的评价后,datafast 用户最看重其 ,而 ROH 用户则强调 automation of payments and invoicing, 用户友好的界面, 培训和支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

datafast ROH ROH
优点
+ Automation of payments and invoicing
+ 用户友好的界面
+ 培训和支持
+ 实时报告和通知
缺点
集成能力

datafast 对比 ROH:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 datafast ROH ROH
小型(10-24 间客房) #3 2 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #4 13 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #2 21 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #2 25 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 datafast ROH ROH
精品酒店 #2 31 条评价
豪华酒店 #2 34 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #2 28 条评价
长住酒店 #3 4 条评价

按区域

细分市场 datafast ROH ROH
北美 #2 61 条评价
欧洲 #3 1 条评价

The Decision

When choosing a payments processing solution for your hotel, your goal is to find a platform that simplifies transactions, enhances cash flow, and integrates smoothly with your existing systems. Datafast by datafast offers a basic, no-frills payment solution, but it lacks reviews, features, and real-world validation. Conversely, ROH by ROH is a proven, feature-rich platform with extensive positive feedback, especially in recent months. Which solution better aligns with your hotel’s needs?

Is Datafast or ROH Better for Hotels?

Datafast appears to be an untested, minimal offering with no reviews, ratings, or real-world applications. It’s essentially an unvalidated product that provides basic payments processing, lacking features or customer support ratings. ROH, on the other hand, boasts 65 reviews, a 4.97/5 support score, and recent feedback from users praising its ease of use and automation. Given the lack of reviews for Datafast, can you confidently rely on its capabilities?

While Datafast claims to handle payments, it offers no detailed features, integrations, or regional presence, making it hard to gauge its effectiveness. ROH has a comprehensive suite of 19 payment features, including refunds, split payments, and support for multiple card types, positioning it as a versatile, reliable solution. For hoteliers seeking validated performance and ongoing support, ROH is the clear choice.

Is Datafast or ROH Easier to Use?

Datafast provides no information on user experience or onboarding, leaving its ease of use entirely uncertain. ROH, however, is rated 4.95/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews emphasizing how intuitive and straightforward the platform is—users say, “It makes making and receiving payments so easy!” and “The interface is very user friendly, and onboarding was seamless.” Given the absence of datafast’s usability insights, ROH’s proven user-friendliness is a decisive advantage.

Furthermore, ROH’s onboarding score of 4.92/5 demonstrates that new users are supported through a smooth transition, encouraging staff adoption. Without any usability data for Datafast, the edge clearly goes to ROH.

Which Has Better Features: Datafast or ROH?

Datafast offers no specific features or integrations, leaving it a blank slate with no added capabilities. ROH provides 19 features, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, pay-by-link options, recurring payments, and acceptance of Apple Pay, Google Pay, Visa, Amex, and more. Additionally, ROH supports chargeback management, tokenization, PCI compliance, and multi-processor gateways.

This comprehensive feature set enables hotels to handle complex transactions and diverse payment methods efficiently. With no features listed for Datafast, it’s evident that ROH’s extensive capabilities give it a significant edge for hotels seeking a full-fledged payments platform.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Datafast or ROH?

Datafast does not have any reviews or ratings to gauge its support quality. ROH, with a 4.97/5 support rating from 65 reviews, stands out as highly responsive and attentive. Users describe it as “support staff is great,” and praise the onboarding process as “very smooth.”

Recent reviews confirm that ROH’s customer support is a key strength, providing prompt assistance and ongoing help. Without any support data for Datafast, the clear winner is ROH.

Which Has More Integrations: Datafast or ROH?

Both products list only one verified partner each—Yanolja Cloud Solution for Datafast and Oracle Hospitality for ROH. The shared integration count is zero, indicating limited connectivity out of the box.

However, ROH’s broader market presence and reputation suggest a more active development pipeline for additional integrations. Still, given the comparable current partner counts, the edge goes to ROH due to its established presence and future potential.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Datafast or ROH?

Datafast has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. ROH, with 65 reviews and a near-perfect 4.97/5 support score, is highly rated across hotel segments, with users praising its ease of use and automation.

While the review count is modest, recent reviews are positive, and the high NPS score of 9.91/10 indicates strong user loyalty. Based on current feedback, ROH clearly earns higher ratings from hoteliers.

How Much Do Datafast and ROH Cost?

Datafast provides no pricing details, leaving potential buyers in the dark. ROH charges $100 monthly, with no mention of discounts or tiered plans.

If you need transparent pricing, ROH’s straightforward model offers clarity; Datafast’s lack of pricing info makes it difficult to evaluate value.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Datafast?

  • Hotels that require a very basic, no-cost payment solution without features or regional presence.
  • Teams that prefer to pilot minimal payment processing without needing extensive support or integrations.
  • Not ideal if your hotel needs compliance, automation, or multi-channel payment options.
  • Not suitable for hotels that value user reviews, support, or comprehensive features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use ROH?

  • Hotels seeking a feature-rich platform with capabilities like refunds, split payments, and support for multiple payment methods.
  • Teams that prioritize ease of use, real-time reporting, and automation to streamline financial processes.
  • Hotels in regions where ROH is active, such as North America, Europe, or Asia Pacific.
  • Not ideal if your hotel has a very tight budget, as the $100/month fee might be a barrier for small properties.

ROH vs Datafast: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference is that ROH is a validated, feature-rich payments platform with high user ratings, while Datafast remains an unreviewed, minimal solution with no proven capabilities. If your hotel needs a reliable, well-supported system, ROH is the clear choice.

Choose ROH if you want automation, extensive features, and proven support that enhances operational efficiency. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores prove its value in real-world hotel environments.

Opt for Datafast only if your hotel’s requirements are extremely basic, and you’re willing to take a risk on an untested platform. Without reviews, features, or regional presence, Datafast offers little assurance of meeting your hotel’s payment processing needs.

In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a dependable, comprehensive payments solution, ROH’s strong review history and feature set make it the better choice.

Datafast 和 ROH 的价格是多少?

支付处理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

datafast ROH ROH
Starting Price From $100/mo

Datafast 有哪些 ROH 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Datafast 和 ROH 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 datafast ROH ROH
付款拆分
定期付款
退款管理
部分捕获
链接支付
预授权

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:datafast 对比 ROH(按业务目标)

我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
datafast

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

ROH Le Méridien St. Louis Clayton, a Marriott Hotel, Managed by Coury Hospitality 小型
+ Within days of launch, the property centralized all group bookings in ROH, giving the GM real-time visibility into deposit status and clear ownership across teams that eliminated the guesswork while accelerating follow-up.
+ With ROHbot automating invoice creation and delivery, sales is now collecting payments earlier and more consistently, improving both guest payment experience and cash flow.
+ In the first 60 days, the property was able to recover 90% of outstanding invoices and now maintains a consistently low aging AR balance month-over-month.

"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."

Matt Korsos
Matt Korsos
General Manager

datafast 对比 ROH:总结

datafast
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 1 个集成
查看资料
ROH
ROH
5.0/5 来自 69 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

Automation of payments and invoicing 100% 正面

Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.

用户友好的界面 100% 正面

ROH 因其直观的界面而备受赞誉,酒店员工和客户均可轻松使用。该平台简化了付款和收款流程,带来更顺畅的交易体验,并提升用户满意度。

培训和支持 100% 正面

用户对 ROH 提供的初始培训和持续支持表示赞赏,这有助于确保软件的顺利采用。这对于新用户的入门或有效解决复杂问题尤其有益。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

集成能力 60% 负面

虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在... 虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在集成。

独特功能

退款管理 预授权 付款拆分 链接支付 部分捕获
5.0/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 1 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

易用性 ROH 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
客户支持 ROH 5.0 vs 0.0 (+5)
性价比 ROH 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
入职培训 ROH 4.9 vs 0.0 (+4.9)

关于 Datafast 与 ROH 的常见问题

Datafast 能否替代 ROH?

这取决于您的需求。Datafast 和 ROH 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Datafast 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ROH 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ROH 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Datafast 或 ROH 是否提供免费方案?

Datafast:否。ROH:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Datafast 和 ROH?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。datafast 的 HT Score 为 0,ROH 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息