The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 收益管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #34 2 条评价 | #43 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #43 2 条评价 | #24 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 19 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #11 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #43 1 条评价 | #24 19 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #18 23 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #43 1 条评价 | #15 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #35 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #26 1 条评价 | #22 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #30 3 条评价 | #28 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #7 21 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #16 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Dataria’s Automatic Pricing and Infor EzRMS hinges on your hotel’s specific revenue management needs and your team's capacity for system complexity. Both systems aim to enhance your pricing strategies, but they approach this goal differently: Dataria offers an automated, data-driven pricing engine, while Infor provides a comprehensive, customizable revenue management platform. Which solution aligns best with your operational style and strategic priorities?
Dataria’s platform boasts a limited but highly focused feature set, emphasizing automatic, algorithm-based pricing with minimal manual intervention. In contrast, Infor EzRMS offers a broader suite of tools, including detailed forecasting, reporting, and integration capabilities, suitable for larger or more complex hotel portfolios. So, do you want a straightforward, automated approach or a full-scale revenue management system?
Your decision should be guided by your hotel’s size, complexity, and level of revenue management sophistication. Dataria excels for smaller hotels or boutique properties seeking an easy-to-implement, automated pricing tool that reduces manual work and enhances revenue with minimal fuss. Since it has a very limited number of reviews—just 4—and no recent feedback, trust in its current performance is limited, but its high support score suggests solid service.
Conversely, Infor EzRMS, with 39 reviews and recent positive feedback, is better suited for larger properties or hotel chains managing multiple properties and seeking detailed forecasting, reporting, and customization. Its extensive feature set and broader market presence make it a more versatile choice, but it may require more training and management effort. Which profile more closely matches your hotel’s needs?
Both platforms are rated very similarly for ease of use, with Dataria scoring 4.5/5 and Infor EzRMS 4.49/5. Dataria’s streamlined interface is praised for its intuitiveness, and its onboarding process receives perfect scores from users, suggesting a gentle learning curve. Customer reviews highlight its straightforward setup, but limited documentation can slow new team members.
Infor EzRMS also scores high on usability, with a user-friendly, modular interface. Nonetheless, some users report that mastering its advanced features requires specific knowledge and training, especially for accurate forecast and rate recommendations. Given the current review counts, the edge goes to Dataria for simplicity.
Dataria offers 34 features unique to its system, including price explanation, scenario analysis, set boundaries, and multi-property dashboards. These tools support flexible, automated pricing adjustments, business mix optimization, and detailed market intelligence. Its features emphasize automation, customization, and control—key for hotels wanting to minimize manual input.
Infor EzRMS provides 13 exclusive features, such as contact management, task management, and mobile app support. While these enhance operational and communication workflows, they are less focused on pricing automation. Its core strength lies in detailed demand forecasting, extensive reporting, and integration capabilities. The clear edge in features favors Dataria for dedicated revenue management automation.
Dataria’s customer support scores a perfect 5/5, with reviewers praising their availability, understanding of the hotel business, and personalized onboarding. Users note that support is responsive and helps them adapt the system to their needs, making it particularly attractive for smaller hotels or those new to revenue management automation.
Infor EzRMS’s support, rated 4.04/5, is appreciated for responsiveness and problem-solving, but some users note that support can sometimes be delayed or less tailored. Feedback highlights that stability issues or broken functionalities following updates can challenge users, especially when support response times are longer. The edge here firmly goes to Dataria.
Infor EzRMS boasts 113 verified integrations, including major PMS and booking engine systems like Mews, Omnibees, and Fairmas. This extensive connectivity is ideal for hotels with complex systems or those seeking to unify various operational tools.
Dataria, with only 3 verified partners, including Neobookings and Mews, offers limited integration options. While sufficient for smaller properties, it may require manual data handling for larger, integrated systems. The clear winner for extensive connectivity is Infor EzRMS.
Despite its limited review count, Dataria’s reviews are highly positive, with a 10/5 NPS score and 100% likelihood to recommend. Users emphasize its support, simplicity, and the impact on revenue, though the lack of recent reviews limits confidence in current performance.
Infor EzRMS has a broader user base, with 28 reviews over the last six months, and an average rating of 4.44/5. Many praise its detailed reports and automation but cite forecast inaccuracies and occasional system issues. Given the recent, more extensive feedback, Infor’s rating is more reflective of current satisfaction.
Dataria charges a straightforward $400 per month, with no implementation or trial fees, making it accessible for small to mid-sized hotels. No pricing details are available for Infor EzRMS, which is typically tailored to larger properties or chains and often involves bespoke quotes based on scale and modules.
Your budget and size will influence your choice: if affordability and ease are priorities, Dataria offers a simple, predictable cost. For larger operations with complex needs, Infor’s pricing is likely more variable but potentially more comprehensive.
Not ideal if your hotel requires detailed forecasting, multi-system integrations, or extensive operational management tools. Larger or more complex properties may find Dataria’s limited feature set insufficient for their needs.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited staff or budget, and primarily needs a simple pricing tool. Infor’s complexity and cost may be overkill for boutique or independent properties seeking only basic automation.
The core difference lies in scope and complexity. Dataria focuses on automating room pricing with a highly tailored, easy-to-use approach, ideal for smaller properties seeking quick wins. Infor EzRMS offers a broader, more detailed platform, suitable for larger hotels or chains aiming for comprehensive revenue management.
Choose Dataria if your hotel prioritizes automation, simplicity, and support, especially at a manageable price point. Opt for Infor EzRMS if you need extensive forecasting, integration, and operational control, and have the resources to manage its complexity.
For hotels seeking a proven, easy-to-implement automated pricing system, Dataria is the clear winner—more recent reviews, higher support scores, and a focused feature set make it the better choice. Larger, multi-property hotels or those requiring advanced analytics and system integrations should lean toward Infor EzRMS, despite its steeper learning curve and higher costs.
In summary:
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
EzRMS 的客户支持因其响应能力和效率而受到高度赞扬,特别是在快速解决技术问题方面。不过,有人建议延长支持时间,并针对特定市场设立专门的团队。
EzRMS 的报告套件因其灵活性和深度而受到称赞,可进行全面的数据比较和趋势分析。它对于回顾性和预测性业务监控都很有效,有助于更好地进行战略规划和决策。
该系统为预测提供了广泛的支持,减少了收益经理的手动输入,并提供了可操作的见解。然而,一些用户认为系统的预测有时不准确,需要进一步改进以提高可靠性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防... EzRMS 提供详细的费率建议,用户认为这有助于优化收入。但是,一些用户报告称,费率上传的准确性和自动化程度存在困难,并且与其他系统的同步仍有改进空间,以防止出现费率差异等问题。
尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是... 尽管最近算法更新后有所改善,但许多用户仍反映 EzRMS 的预测准确性存在问题。人们普遍认为,尽管该工具功能强大,但预测有时会与实际结果存在很大差异,尤其是在 COVID-19 疫情等动态条件下。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Automatic Pricing (by Dataria) 和 Infor EzRMS 共享许多核心 Revenue Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Automatic Pricing (by Dataria) 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor EzRMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Automatic Pricing (by Dataria) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Automatic Pricing (by Dataria):否。Infor EzRMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Revenue Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Dataria 的 HT Score 为 0,Infor 的为 25。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问