The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #41 0 条评价 | #9 51 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 3 条评价 | #14 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #16 2 条评价 | #7 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #15 29 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #34 2 条评价 | #13 27 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 3 条评价 | #15 14 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #14 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #17 2 条评价 | #18 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #19 10 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #17 3 条评价 | #5 67 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #7 13 条评价 |
Choosing the right channel management software can significantly impact your hotel's revenue, operational efficiency, and guest experience. Both DerbySoft’s Connectivity Services and Exely Channel Manager aim to streamline online distribution, but they differ in scope, user feedback, and market presence. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific needs—so which solution is the better fit?
DerbySoft offers extensive global coverage, robust integrations, and a deep history in the industry, while Exely provides a highly rated, user-friendly interface with a focus on ease of use and affordability. But which one truly solves your biggest distribution challenges?
Both DerbySoft and Exely serve hotel properties seeking to optimize their distribution channels, yet they approach the problem differently. DerbySoft’s connectivity platform emphasizes broad network coverage, deep integrations, and solutions tailored for large hotel chains or properties requiring extensive CRS and PMS connectivity. Meanwhile, Exely’s Channel Manager simplifies rate and availability updates across multiple OTAs with a focus on ease and automation, ideal for small to mid-sized hotels.
DerbySoft’s solution has a limited review count (6 reviews, all from the past 6 months), making its data less recent and less comprehensive than Exely’s, which boasts 102 reviews—many from the last 6 months—highlighting its current relevance. With a perfect recent score of 85.1, Exely clearly leads in user confidence. Does your hotel need a proven, broadly adopted solution, or a specialized tool that simplifies distribution?
If your hotel needs extensive connectivity, especially at the PMS or CRS level, DerbySoft is the better pick. It’s suited for large brands or chains that require real-time ARI delivery, multiple integrations, and a focus on global coverage—its 16 verified partners include industry giants like Oracle Hospitality and Infor, which underscores its enterprise focus.
Conversely, if your hotel is more concerned with ease of management, rapid updates, and budget-friendly options, go with Exely. Its user satisfaction is reflected in a 4.95/5 Ease of Use rating and a 98% likelihood to recommend, making it ideal for independent hotels or smaller chains aiming to reduce overbooking and manual work. Exely’s focus on automation and straightforward interface makes it the better option for hotels prioritizing simplicity.
DerbySoft’s interface scores 4.5/5, with onboarding rated 4.33/5, indicating a generally smooth learning curve but potentially requiring some initial training for complex features like PMS connectivity and yield rules. Reviews highlight the responsiveness of DerbySoft’s support and the platform’s real-time updates, but users note that reporting and notification features could improve, especially for new users.
Exely, on the other hand, scores a near-perfect 4.95/5 for ease of use, with onboarding rated 4.86/5. Reviewers praise its intuitive interface, quick setup, and effortless updates across channels. Its automation features reduce manual tasks, which most users find straightforward and reliable.
Edge: Exely.
DerbySoft offers 15 shared features and two additional features exclusive to its platform: PMS connectivity and yield rules. These capabilities are essential for large hotels managing complex distribution and revenue strategies, offering granular control over rates and inventory.
Exely provides 13 shared features, with no exclusive features, but excels in core channel management, rate updates, and automated reporting. Its simplicity and automation are perceived as more accessible for hotels that do not need advanced revenue management tools.
Edge: DerbySoft.
DerbySoft’s customer support scores 4.83/5, with reviewers describing the team as responsive, helpful, and proactive. Feedback mentions quick responses, dedicated managers, and positive experiences, although some wish for more detailed reports and notifications.
Exely’s support ratings are marginally higher at 4.95/5, with reviews emphasizing their responsiveness, helpfulness, and ongoing platform updates. Users find Exely’s support team highly engaged, making onboarding and troubleshooting easier.
Edge: Exely.
DerbySoft boasts 16 verified partners, including major industry players like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Infor, offering extensive integration options for large hotel groups. It also features unique integrations like apaleo GmbH and Hotelchamp.
Exely has 8 verified partners, including Booking.com and Hotellab, with a focus on essential OTAs and channels. While its partner count is smaller, it covers critical channels for independent and mid-sized hotels, offering reliable synchronization.
Edge: DerbySoft.
Exely enjoys a higher recent review score (85.1) and a 98% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong current user satisfaction. Its users, primarily hotel chains and independent properties, praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
DerbySoft’s reviews are limited (6 total, all from the last 6 months), with no published ratings, but its support scores 4.83/5. Although it appeals to larger hotels, its lower review count makes it less demonstrative of recent user sentiment.
Edge: Exely.
DerbySoft’s connectivity services start at $1,000 per month, with no free tier or trial available. Its pricing reflects its enterprise-level offerings, tailored for larger hotel groups seeking extensive integration.
Exely charges a $100 monthly fee, with no mention of implementation or setup costs, making it more affordable and accessible for smaller hotels or chains with tighter budgets. Both lack trial options, so hotel managers must evaluate based on their needs and budget.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
DerbySoft excels in providing a comprehensive, enterprise-grade connectivity solution with extensive integrations, tailored for large hotel chains and properties with complex distribution needs. Its core strength lies in PMS and CRS connectivity, yield management, and global reach, but it comes with a higher price point and a steeper learning curve.
Exely offers a highly rated, easy-to-use channel management platform at a fraction of DerbySoft’s cost, perfect for smaller hotels or chains looking to streamline rate updates and minimize manual work. Its recent reviews underscore strong user satisfaction, support, and automation features, making it a reliable choice for hotels prioritizing simplicity.
If your property operates at a large scale and needs deep integration and control, DerbySoft is the clear leader. For hotels seeking quick deployment, affordability, and high user ratings, Exely is the recommended choice.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
费率管理
|
|
|
| 支持每周和每月费率 | ||
| 收益规则 | ||
| 派生费率 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
|
▾
房间类型映射
|
|
|
| 通道自映射 | ||
|
▾
自动化与同步
|
|
|
| 批量更新和多重限制 | ||
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
|
▾
管理和设置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
| 综合支付处理 | ||
|
▾
分析和报告
|
|
|
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 预订绩效和进度报告 |
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before Exely, we could not get enough flexibility or functionality we needed. We couldn’t manage dynamic pricing or promotions properly, now the system provides us all the tools t..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论者一致认为 Exely 直观易用、简单易学,并且能够高效地在一个平台上管理预订、房价和渠道。其主要优势在于节省时间:酒店表示,Exely 简化了日常运营,降低... 评论者一致认为 Exely 直观易用、简单易学,并且能够高效地在一个平台上管理预订、房价和渠道。其主要优势在于节省时间:酒店表示,Exely 简化了日常运营,降低了复杂性,并帮助员工减少手动操作,从而提高工作效率。
许多用户称赞Exely的支持团队能够快速提供以解决方案为导向的帮助,使操作更加顺畅,尤其是在设置或紧急预订问题上。少数用户指出,如果高峰期响应速度更快或本... 许多用户称赞Exely的支持团队能够快速提供以解决方案为导向的帮助,使操作更加顺畅,尤其是在设置或紧急预订问题上。少数用户指出,如果高峰期响应速度更快或本地支持更积极主动,用户体验将会更上一层楼。
许多评论者认为,Exely 提高了酒店的直接预订量,降低了对在线旅行社 (OTA) 的依赖,从而通过减少佣金成本帮助酒店提高盈利能力。他们还提到了一些以收益为导向... 许多评论者认为,Exely 提高了酒店的直接预订量,降低了对在线旅行社 (OTA) 的依赖,从而通过减少佣金成本帮助酒店提高盈利能力。他们还提到了一些以收益为导向的工具,例如促销活动、早鸟优惠、价格控制和基于入住率的优化,这些工具有助于将更多网站流量转化为实际预订。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
普遍认为,Exely 的内置报表对日常运营很有用,但许多用户希望获得更深入、更可定制的分析功能。评论者要求改进按渠道划分的绩效跟踪、更精准的收入洞察、更快的... 普遍认为,Exely 的内置报表对日常运营很有用,但许多用户希望获得更深入、更可定制的分析功能。评论者要求改进按渠道划分的绩效跟踪、更精准的收入洞察、更快的数据更新速度以及自定义报表选项,以支持更明智的分销决策。
许多评论者希望在报告、确认模板、发票格式和预订引擎外观方面拥有更大的灵活性。最常见的抱怨是分析和品牌定制选项有限,此外还要求提供酒店专属颜色、更现代化... 许多评论者希望在报告、确认模板、发票格式和预订引擎外观方面拥有更大的灵活性。最常见的抱怨是分析和品牌定制选项有限,此外还要求提供酒店专属颜色、更现代化的模板,以及对预订流程和促销活动的更好控制。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Connectivity Services by DerbySoft 和 Exely Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Connectivity Services by DerbySoft 提供 16 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Channel Manager 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Connectivity Services by DerbySoft:否。Exely Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DerbySoft 的 HT Score 为 0,Exely 的为 88。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案