The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 453 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
DIRS21 by TourOnline AG 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Referral Reporting.
Yanolja Cloud Solution 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Automated reporting and Pre-stay emails.
基于 HTR 上 453 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 453 |
在分析了 453 条经验证的评价后,DIRS21 by TourOnline AG 用户最看重其 ,而 Yanolja Cloud Solution 用户则强调 integration with pms and channel manager, 预订流程和可用性, 直接预订和收入。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Integration with PMS and Channel Manager
▾
|
|
|
+
预订流程和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
直接预订和收入
▾
|
|
|
+
实时库存和定价
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
移动兼容性
▾
|
|
|
−
定制和品牌
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 252 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 99 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #29 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #5 159 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 203 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #7 69 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #13 15 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 48 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #28 7 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #3 342 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #6 10 条评价 |
Choosing between DIRS21 One and Yanolja Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs. Both products aim to boost direct bookings and streamline reservation management, but they differ significantly in features, support, and global reach. DIRS21 offers a modular, customizable system rooted in European markets, while Yanolja provides a widely adopted, intuitive platform with extensive integration options and a more recent, highly-rated user experience.
What factors matter most for your hotel’s growth—advanced customization and local European features or broad integration and ease of use on a global scale? Let’s compare both to see which fits your strategy better.
DIRS21 and Yanolja serve similar core functions—online booking and distribution—but their strengths and weaknesses vary. DIRS21, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, offers a broad suite of features, especially for hotels seeking extensive customization and control. However, its lack of recent user feedback raises concerns about support and ongoing development.
Yanolja, with 380 reviews and a recent rating of 4.63/5, dominates in user satisfaction, ease of use, and support. Its high NPS score of 9.49 indicates strong loyalty, and recent reviews praise its intuitive interface and seamless integrations. Do you prioritize a platform with proven recent performance and strong peer recommendations?
If your hotel needs a well-supported, easy-to-adopt platform with extensive integrations and high user satisfaction, Yanolja is the clear choice. It suits properties seeking to increase direct bookings while minimizing administrative hassle, especially those in North America, Europe, or markets requiring quick implementation.
Conversely, if your hotel desires a highly customizable, modular system with specific European features—like Google Hotel Ads, Tripadvisor Bookings, or custom add-ons—DIRS21 might appeal, provided support and ongoing updates aren’t critical priorities. For most hotels aiming to grow with a proven, reliable platform, Yanolja’s recent reviews and higher ratings make it the better fit.
Yanolja’s UI is rated 4.76/5, reflecting a user-friendly experience praised across reviews. Support staff are highlighted for their responsiveness, with users describing onboarding as smooth and intuitive, especially for larger teams. Recent reviews commend its simple navigation and quick learning curve, making staff adoption straightforward.
DIRS21’s rating is 0/5, with no recent reviews to assess usability or onboarding. Given the absence of recent user feedback, it’s difficult to judge how intuitive or accessible the platform is today. Edge: Yanolja.
DIRS21 boasts 18 shared features plus 15 unique functionalities, including room substitutions, Google Hotel Ads bookings, and custom add-ons—features that support complex, tailored operations. Its suite covers advanced rate comparison, referral reporting, and modules for weddings and corporate events.
Yanolja offers 18 shared features and 4 unique ones—namely automated reporting, pre-stay, post-stay emails, and social media integration. While it lacks some advanced customization, its features focus on automation, guest engagement, and simplified management.
Edge: DIRS21 for feature depth and customization options; Yanolja for streamlined automation.
Yanolja’s customer support is highly rated, with an average of 4.78/5, and recent reviews highlight its dedicated, responsive team. Hotel managers praise the support for making onboarding smooth, quick resolutions, and ongoing assistance—contributing to its high NPS score of 9.49.
DIRS21, with no recent reviews, cannot be reliably assessed for support quality. Its lack of current feedback suggests it may not match Yanolja’s responsiveness or support standards. Edge: Yanolja.
Yanolja offers 157 verified integrations, including popular platforms like Profitroom, RevControl, and Xero, providing broad compatibility for diverse hotel ecosystems. Its extensive partner network supports automation, CRM, PMS, and social media tools, making it adaptable for complex operation setups.
DIRS21 has 31 verified partners—including key players like Hotelchamp and Google Hotel Ads—but its fewer integrations limit flexibility, especially for properties needing extensive third-party connectivity.
Edge: Yanolja.
Yanolja’s recent reviews show an average rating of 4.63/5 from 380 reviewers, predominantly from hotels in North America, Europe, and beyond. Hotels in various segments—resorts, boutique hotels, hostels—appreciate its ease of use and support, with some describing it as a “game-changer” for direct bookings.
DIRS21’s reviews are absent from recent data, leaving its reputation unverified in current hotel markets. Given the volume and recency of Yanolja’s reviews, it is clearly the higher-rated option today.
Edge: Yanolja.
DIRS21 does not publicly disclose pricing details, suggesting a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. Its no-trial, no-flat-fee model indicates potential variability and possibly higher costs for advanced features.
Yanolja’s platform starts at $100/month, with no implementation or hidden fees. Its transparent pricing makes budgeting straightforward and accessible for hotels of all sizes.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers quick setup, high ease of use, or frequent support—given the lack of recent user reviews, ongoing support quality is uncertain.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive customization or operates in highly niche markets that require specialized features only available in more modular, customizable platforms like DIRS21.
Yanolja’s strength lies in its recent, high-volume positive reviews, ease of use, and extensive integrations. It appeals to hotels looking for a reliable, user-friendly system that enhances direct booking capabilities and reduces operational friction.
DIRS21 offers a customizable, feature-rich platform suitable for hotels with complex needs and dedicated tech teams. Its lack of recent reviews and support data, however, makes it a less trustworthy choice for hotels prioritizing proven performance and support.
If you want a proven, well-supported booking engine with high satisfaction, Yanolja is your choice. For hotels needing tailored solutions and advanced features, DIRS21 could be suitable, but only if support and ongoing development are not critical concerns. Overall, Yanolja’s recent reviews and high ratings make it the recommended choice for most hotels today.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,DIRS21 One 和 Yanolja Booking Engine 共享 18 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
| 自动报告 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 费率计划比较 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We can now manage every property in our franchise from a single dashboard, track performance instantly, and know that our team has 24/7 support whenever it’s needed. It has complet..."
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Reviews appreciate the seamless integration of the booking engine with PMS and Channel Manager, making day-to-day operations smooth by providing real-... Reviews appreciate the seamless integration of the booking engine with PMS and Channel Manager, making day-to-day operations smooth by providing real-time updates and eliminating risks of manual error and overbookings. This functionality enhances both front-office and back-end processes, helping hotels to save time and reduce reliance on third-party platforms.
用户认为当前的预订流程冗长且碎片化,建议更精简的流程可以减少流失率并提高转化率。他们建议采用两步或三步的预订流程,以提升预订流程的流畅性,尤其是在移动... 用户认为当前的预订流程冗长且碎片化,建议更精简的流程可以减少流失率并提高转化率。他们建议采用两步或三步的预订流程,以提升预订流程的流畅性,尤其是在移动设备上,从而确保更佳的宾客体验。
该引擎被证明能够有效增加直接预订量,降低支付给OTA的佣金,从而保障酒店收入。用户称赞其用户友好的设计,能够有效吸引直接流量访问酒店网站。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然预订引擎提供了基本的报告功能,但用户需要更高级的分析工具和自定义选项,以便更好地跟踪绩效指标并支持战略决策。与 Google Analytics 等外部分析平台的集... 虽然预订引擎提供了基本的报告功能,但用户需要更高级的分析工具和自定义选项,以便更好地跟踪绩效指标并支持战略决策。与 Google Analytics 等外部分析平台的集成尤其值得一提,是一项亟待改进的功能。
尽管移动端有诸多优势,但用户指出其可用性仍有提升空间,尤其是在用户界面方面,有时用户界面显得有些局促。更具设备响应能力的设计可以提升整体用户互动体验,... 尽管移动端有诸多优势,但用户指出其可用性仍有提升空间,尤其是在用户界面方面,有时用户界面显得有些局促。更具设备响应能力的设计可以提升整体用户互动体验,并提升移动端预订的获取率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。DIRS21 One 和 Yanolja Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。DIRS21 One 提供 31 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Yanolja Booking Engine 提供 157 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Yanolja Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
DIRS21 One:否。Yanolja Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DIRS21 by TourOnline AG 的 HT Score 为 0,Yanolja Cloud Solution 的为 92。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问