The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
ITi Computers 表现出色 .
Infor 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 47 |
在分析了 47 条经验证的评价后,ITi Computers 用户最看重其 ,而 Infor 用户则强调 易于使用, 报告, 一体化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
报告
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化
▾
|
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持
▾
|
|
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #44 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #25 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #28 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 26 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #31 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #24 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can be a game-changer for your hotel, but the options are vast. Both Diventa PMS by ITi Computers and Infor HMS aim to streamline your operations and improve guest experiences, yet they approach these goals differently. While Diventa PMS offers a simple, user-friendly platform with limited features, Infor HMS provides a comprehensive suite of tools but comes with some usability and stability concerns. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Diventa PMS and Infor HMS are both designed to automate and optimize hotel management tasks. Diventa PMS appears to be a straightforward, lightweight option, primarily focused on core property management functions. In contrast, Infor HMS offers an extensive array of features, including housekeeping, revenue management, and integrations with booking engines. The key difference lies in their maturity and feature depth—Infor HMS has a broader scope but a more complex interface, while Diventa PMS is simpler but lacks many advanced tools.
The choice between them hinges on your hotel’s size and operational complexity. If your team favors simplicity and ease of onboarding, Diventa PMS might be appealing. But if you need sophisticated, integrated features to manage multiple revenue streams and complex workflows, Infor HMS stands out. Are you looking for a lean, easy-to-implement solution or a feature-rich system that covers every operational aspect?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with extensive integrations and automation, go with Infor HMS. Its 46 reviews with an overall rating of 4.04/5 and recent feedback underscore its robustness, especially for properties that require detailed reporting, revenue management, and multi-lingual support.
If simplicity, quick onboarding, and basic property management are priorities, Diventa PMS might seem attractive; however, its zero reviews and ratings cast doubt on its current market validation. For hotels seeking proven software with active user feedback, Infor HMS offers a safer, more reliable choice.
Ultimately, if your hotel aims for operational depth, Infor is the clear winner. For straightforward property management, the lack of recent data on Diventa PMS makes it a less certain option.
Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 for ease of use, reflecting a generally navigable interface appreciated by many users, especially after onboarding. Reviews mention that the system is "easy to navigate once you get its format down," and onboarding averages around 3.64/5, suggesting a moderate learning curve.
Conversely, Diventa PMS has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability confidently. Given Infor’s established user base and recent reviews, its ease of use appears adequate for most hotels.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, calendar view, direct billing, and revenue management tools. Its capabilities extend into multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and automation like night audits, making it a comprehensive platform.
Diventa PMS, on the other hand, offers no verified features or unique modules, suggesting limited functionality or a lack of available detailed data. Without these features, its utility for more complex hotel operations remains questionable.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS’s support receives a 4.04/5 rating, with reviews highlighting responsiveness and professionalism. Users mention that the support team is prompt and helpful, which is crucial when dealing with software glitches or updates.
Diventa PMS has no customer support ratings or reviews available, leaving its support quality unverified. Given the higher support rating and recent review activity, Infor HMS clearly offers more reliable customer service.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including key booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, as well as revenue management and CRM systems. This extensive network facilitates smooth data flow and operational efficiency.
Diventa PMS, with zero verified integrations, lacks this connectivity. For hotels relying on multiple systems or seeking to automate booking and revenue workflows, Infor HMS provides a significant advantage.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Currently, Infor HMS holds a 4.04/5 overall rating based on 46 reviews, with recent feedback from multiple regions. Hotels of various segments—particularly boutique and city center hotels—rate Infor HMS favorably, citing improved efficiency and support.
Diventa PMS has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to evaluate user satisfaction. Given the active review base and recent data, Infor HMS enjoys a higher reputation among hoteliers.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Both products do not list specific pricing details, indicating they likely require direct contact for quotes. This lack of transparent pricing suggests they may be tailored solutions or enterprise-level services.
If you prioritize budget transparency, you may need to reach out directly. However, considering the scope and reviews, Infor HMS’s value appears justified for larger or more complex hotels.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference between Infor HMS and Diventa PMS lies in their scope and maturity. Infor HMS offers a broad feature set, integrations, and proven support, making it suitable for mid-size to large hotels with complex needs. Diventa PMS appears to be a basic, potentially less-tested solution, suitable only for small properties or those with minimal operational complexity.
If your hotel values a feature-rich, well-supported platform and can afford the investment, Infor HMS should be your choice. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive integrations make it the safer, more reliable option.
However, if your hotel’s needs are very simple, and you want an easy-to-deploy, no-fuss system, the lack of recent review data on Diventa PMS makes it less certain. Without verified features or recent feedback, it’s difficult to recommend confidently.
In summary, for hotels seeking proven, scalable, and well-supported PMS software, Infor HMS is the recommended choice. It’s the product with more recent reviews, higher ratings, and a broader feature set—making it the clear leader for most modern hotel operations.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Diventa PMS 和 Infor HMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Diventa PMS 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Diventa PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Diventa PMS:否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ITi Computers 的 HT Score 为 0,Infor 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问