The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
TOTVS |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #31 3 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #43 0 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #25 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
TOTVS |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 | #31 2 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #31 2 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #39 0 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #31 0 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
TOTVS |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #33 0 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #10 3 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #16 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between DJUBO and TOTVS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and the features that matter most. DJUBO offers an integrated, comprehensive platform designed for hotels seeking all-in-one management, while TOTVS remains an untested option with no recent reviews or feature data. Given the available data, DJUBO clearly leads in user feedback, usability, and functionality. Are you ready to dig into the details to see which suits your hotel best?
Both DJUBO and TOTVS aim to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge sharply in market presence, user feedback, and feature sets. DJUBO, with its 19 reviews in the last six months, boasts a high customer satisfaction score of 4.76/5 and an NPS of 9.63, confirming strong recent performance. In contrast, TOTVS lacks recent reviews and scores, making it impossible to assess its current effectiveness.
DJUBO’s customer feedback highlights its intuitive interface, robust feature set, and dedicated support. Conversely, TOTVS provides no recent reviews or user feedback, leaving hoteliers uncertain about its real-world performance. Given the absence of data on TOTVS, do you want a proven, highly-rated platform, or are you willing to risk unverified solutions?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one platform with extensive features, ease of use, and proven support, DJUBO is the clear choice. For hotels seeking a comprehensive PMS, integrated channel management, booking engine, POS, and revenue tools, DJUBO’s 42 unique features and recent, high ratings make it the more reliable option.
For teams that prioritize usability, strong customer support, and a product with a track record of recent positive reviews, DJUBO’s 4.95/5 ease of use and 4.76/5 support ratings are decisive. If your hotel is a boutique, resort, or independent property, DJUBO’s flexibility and feature set align well with your needs.
In contrast, TOTVS offers no recent reviews or feature data, so unless you are considering a long-term, untested solution, DJUBO is the safer, more proven choice.
DJUBO’s user interface scores a remarkable 4.95/5, reflecting a highly intuitive, well-designed experience favored by users for onboarding and daily operations. Its recent reviews praise its simplicity, with one reviewer calling it “very easy to use supportive staff and very good software for hotel use.” The onboarding process is rated 4.83/5, reinforcing DJUBO’s reputation as accessible for new users.
On the other hand, TOTVS has no recent reviews or publicly available ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability. Without user feedback, hoteliers cannot confidently gauge how easy or supportive the platform is in real-world scenarios.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO offers an extensive suite of 42 features tailored for hotel management, including a channel manager, booking engine, POS, revenue management, guest profiles, automated night audit, and integrated CRS. These features support multi-currency, multi-lingual operations, and mobile management, making it a comprehensive toolset for diverse hotel needs.
In contrast, TOTVS does not provide public data on features or integrations, and it lacks any verified features in the available data. Without detailed feature information, it’s clear DJUBO is the more capable platform for hotel management.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO’s support ratings are strong, with a 4.76/5 score and reviews praising its availability and professionalism. Customers appreciate the “support team always available for us,” and the onboarding process is well-rated at 4.83/5, confirming quality support.
In contrast, TOTVS has no recent reviews or ratings on customer support, leaving uncertainty about its responsiveness or quality. For hoteliers who value reliable support, DJUBO’s track record is significantly more reassuring.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO integrates with three verified partners, including Tripadvisor, Simplotel, and its internal booking engine, enabling smooth distribution and reservation management. No integrations are publicly verified for TOTVS, and it has zero listed partners.
This limited integration landscape puts DJUBO ahead for hotels seeking a connected ecosystem, especially if you depend on third-party tools for distribution, marketing, or reservations.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO’s 19 recent reviews in the last six months overwhelmingly praise its usability, features, and support, with a 96% likelihood to recommend. Its property segment ratings are consistently high, with an overall hotel rating of 5/5 from independent properties.
Without any recent reviews or ratings for TOTVS, it’s impossible to determine how hoteliers perceive it. The recent, positive feedback for DJUBO makes it the clear choice for confidence and satisfaction.
Edge: DJUBO.
Both products do not publicly disclose pricing models, which suggests they may be customized or require direct negotiation. DJUBO does not offer a freemium or trial, indicating a potentially premium pricing structure, while TOTVS’s pricing remains unlisted.
Without transparent costs, you must contact each vendor for a quote, but DJUBO’s established presence and feature set imply a predictable value proposition compared to the unknowns of TOTVS.
Not ideal if your hotel is extremely small, with minimal management needs, or if you prefer a lightweight or niche solution.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a feature-rich, well-supported system or values recent customer reviews and proven performance.
DJUBO offers a comprehensive, integrated hotel management platform with 42 features, high user ratings, and recent positive reviews. Its proven support, ease of use, and extensive integrations make it a reliable choice for most hotels seeking full operational control.
In comparison, TOTVS provides no recent reviews, feature details, or verified integrations, making it a risky, untested option. Unless you are an organization willing to experiment with an unproven platform, DJUBO is the clear recommendation.
For hotels that desire a dependable, feature-rich solution with proven customer satisfaction, DJUBO is the optimal choice. If your hotel is comfortable with limited data and seeks a simple, perhaps less supported system, TOTVS might be considered, though the lack of recent feedback is a significant concern.
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Djubo 和 TOTVS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 TOTVS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Djubo 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo:否。TOTVS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,TOTVS 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案