The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 591 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
DJUBO 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Feedback Management and Native Email Marketing.
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 易用性 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.
基于 HTR 上 591 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 19 | 572 |
在分析了 591 条经验证的评价后,DJUBO 用户最看重其 ,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 易用性, 客户服务, 持续改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
关键问题
▾
|
|
|
−
定价问题
▾
|
|
|
−
访客数据库透明度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #31 3 条评价 | #5 214 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #43 0 条评价 | #8 50 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 18 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #25 0 条评价 | #8 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 2 条评价 | #3 245 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #31 2 条评价 | #4 149 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #39 0 条评价 | #5 70 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 0 条评价 | #3 72 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #33 0 条评价 | #14 11 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 445 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 3 条评价 | #8 9 条评价 |
| 中东 | #16 0 条评价 | #17 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software can significantly influence your property’s efficiency and guest experience. Both DJUBO and RoomRaccoon aim to streamline operations, but they target different hotel segments and offer distinct features. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, market focus, and specific operational needs.
DJUBO is an all-in-one platform with extensive integrations and a global presence, suited for properties seeking comprehensive control. RoomRaccoon emphasizes user-friendliness and automation for small to medium-sized independent hotels. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans?
DJUBO, founded in 2014, is a cloud-based platform trusted by over 2,300 hotels across 21 countries, primarily serving larger properties and groups. It consolidates PMS, Channel Manager, Booking Engine, POS, and Revenue Management into a single system, simplifying complexity but requiring a more involved onboarding process. Its recent review count (19) is lower, but the older reviews are consistent and highly positive, emphasizing control and customization.
RoomRaccoon, established in 2017, is favored by thousands of small hotels, B&Bs, and independent properties worldwide, with over 484 reviews, most recent just 8 months ago. Its all-in-one system combines property management, channel management, and booking tools with automated features like AI pricing and upselling. The high review count and recent feedback indicate a more dynamic and widely adopted solution.
Both products aim to optimize operations, but DJUBO’s broader reach and integration depth make it suitable for larger or multi-location hotels. Conversely, RoomRaccoon’s intuitive design and automation appeal to smaller, growth-focused hoteliers seeking ease of use. Which one better addresses your current operational scale?
If your hotel needs a scalable, multi-region system with extensive integrations and control over complex operations, DJUBO is the clear choice. Its robust features like native email marketing, guest feedback management, and rules-based room assignments cater to properties that require detailed customization and real-time visibility.
If your hotel prioritizes simplicity, automation, and rapid onboarding, RoomRaccoon is ideal. It’s especially suitable for small to medium independent hotels that want to boost direct bookings, automate guest communications, and leverage AI-driven pricing to maximize revenue. For properties with a focus on guest experience and quick implementation, RoomRaccoon offers a compelling advantage.
In summary, choose DJUBO if you seek a comprehensive, enterprise-level platform. Opt for RoomRaccoon if you desire an easy-to-use, automated system tailored for smaller properties.
DJUBO’s interface is rated 4.95/5, with many users praising its professional appearance and functional layout. However, some reviews mention that the initial setup and learning curve can be more involved due to its extensive feature set, which may require dedicated staff training.
RoomRaccoon scores slightly higher at 4.87/5, with users emphasizing its intuitive, guest-friendly interface. The onboarding process is generally smooth, with many reviews highlighting quick learning and minimal training time, making staff adoption faster.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
DJUBO offers 10 features unique to its platform, including guest feedback management, native email marketing, direct billing, SMS communication, tablet check-in, and integrated CRS. These features cater to properties seeking detailed control, especially on operational and guest communication fronts.
RoomRaccoon provides 25 exclusive features, notably AI-powered pricing, automated upselling, multi-currency support, loyalty integrations, guest apps, shift planning, and online checkouts. Its focus on automation and guest engagement makes it highly suitable for hoteliers aiming to scale efficiently.
Shared features total 32, but RoomRaccoon’s broader suite of native and automation tools gives it a noticeable edge, particularly for small to mid-sized hotels.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
DJUBO’s support rating of 4.76/5 is slightly higher, with reviews highlighting its professional, accessible, and proactive support team. Many users appreciate the detailed onboarding and ongoing assistance, especially given DJUBO's complex feature set.
RoomRaccoon’s 4.74/5 rating reflects its responsive support and dedicated customer success team. Users note the patience and personalized assistance, especially during onboarding and integration phases. However, some report occasional delays, which are typically resolved quickly.
Edge: DJUBO.
RoomRaccoon boasts 88 verified integrations, including popular partners like Sage, HQ revenue, and Paxxio, along with over 300 in its marketplace. Its extensive integration marketplace allows for versatile connection with various booking, payment, and POS systems, making it ideal for properties seeking flexibility.
DJUBO offers only 3 verified integrations, including TripAdvisor and Simplotel, which may limit connectivity options for larger or multi-channel operations. Its more curated partner list suits hotels with specific, established integrations in mind.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
With 484 reviews, RoomRaccoon’s overall rating of 4.95/5 and recent feedback from small hotel operators highlight its high satisfaction levels. Independent hoteliers especially praise its ease of use, automation, and revenue growth achievements like increased RevPAR and direct bookings.
DJUBO’s 19 reviews, primarily from larger or multi-location hotels, rate it very highly at 5/5 but with less recent feedback. Its complexity and control appeal to enterprise-level properties, but fewer recent reviews suggest less current user experience data.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
DJUBO does not publicly disclose pricing, which suggests a bespoke quote based on your property size and needs. It typically involves a licensing fee, and implementation costs may apply, reflecting its enterprise focus.
RoomRaccoon charges a base fee of $1,000, with no mention of additional licensing or setup costs. Its pricing model aligns with small to medium properties seeking transparent, predictable costs without hidden fees.
Overall, RoomRaccoon’s straightforward pricing makes it easier to evaluate ROI, especially for smaller hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited staff resources or a focus on rapid, simple implementation.
Not ideal if your hotel operates across multiple regions with highly complex, customized operational needs that demand extensive control.
DJUBO offers a comprehensive, enterprise-grade solution with broad control, suited for larger or multi-location hotels that need a customizable, scalable platform. Its robust integrations, detailed features, and strong support cater to properties with complex operational demands.
RoomRaccoon excels in simplicity, automation, and rapid onboarding, making it highly attractive for small to medium independent hotels focused on growth and guest experience. Its more extensive native features and recent reviews suggest it is the preferred choice for properties prioritizing ease of use and direct revenue enhancement.
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable platform and your team has the resources for a detailed setup, DJUBO is the better fit. However, if you want a user-friendly, automation-rich system that helps you grow efficiently, RoomRaccoon is the clear winner.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Djubo 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享 32 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 自动报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 23 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户称赞 RoomRaccoon 具有用户友好的界面和直观的设计,这减少了培训时间,并能顺利融入日常操作,从而提高了整体效率。
虽然一些用户称赞支持团队的响应速度和专业水平,但另一些用户则批评售后服务和响应效率不足,这表明客户服务质量存在不一致之处。
用户赞赏 RoomRaccoon 的持续发展,包括 AI 的增强,这些都有助于提高销售和运营功能,展现了其对长期适应性的承诺。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
多篇评论指出,售后支持不力、技术问题悬而未决等关键问题严重影响了用户满意度和对系统的信任度。
一些用户,尤其是那些经营季节性业务的用户,认为该系统的定价过高,这影响了他们的决策,尽管他们认为该系统包含的功能很有价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Djubo 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon HMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Djubo 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo:否。RoomRaccoon HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,RoomRaccoon 的为 86。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问