The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 员工协作工具 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #13 2 条评价 | #9 3 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 4 条评价 | #6 53 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #15 3 条评价 | #5 36 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 15 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #21 4 条评价 | #5 46 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #21 3 条评价 | #4 40 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #18 4 条评价 | #3 96 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 3 条评价 | #5 15 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #18 2 条评价 | #4 100 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #6 2 条评价 | #11 0 条评价 |
Choosing between D-Edge Dmbook and Quore hinges on your hotel's specific needs for staff collaboration. D-Edge Dmbook aims to streamline internal communication and handovers, functioning as a full-time virtual assistant to reduce errors and improve task management. Quore, on the other hand, offers a broader suite of over 30 tools designed to enhance operational efficiency across departments, including maintenance, guest services, and housekeeping. Which approach aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
D-Edge excels at providing a straightforward, easy-to-adopt solution rooted in communication and task handover, while Quore delivers a comprehensive platform that covers many operational facets. The decision ultimately depends on whether you need a specialized tool for internal communication or a multi-function system to manage diverse operational tasks.
Both products aim to improve communication and coordination among hotel staff, but they do so with different emphases. D-Edge Dmbook focuses on the handover process, reducing miscommunication, and ensuring critical information is accessible from anywhere, akin to having a dedicated assistant. Quore emphasizes streamlining multiple operational workflows, from maintenance to guest requests, through a suite of more than 30 features. Do you prioritize seamless internal communication or a multi-tool platform for daily operations?
D-Edge’s recent reviews underscore its high overall rating of 4.67 out of 5, backed by just 10 reviews—most from boutique or independent hotels—and a 92% likelihood to recommend. Its simplicity and responsiveness appeal to properties seeking a reliable handover solution. Quore, with 115 reviews and a rating of 4.27 out of 5, scores slightly lower but benefits from a broader feature set, including work orders, preventive maintenance, and real-time task tracking. Do you prefer a specialized, highly-rated communication tool, or a multi-feature platform with more recent validation?
If your hotel needs a straightforward tool to improve internal communication, reduce emails and calls, and ensure nothing slips through the cracks, go with D-Edge Dmbook. Its single focus makes onboarding easier, and recent reviews highlight its effectiveness in reducing handover times and improving team responsiveness.
If you require a versatile system that manages maintenance, guest requests, inventory, and staff communication in one place, Quore is the better choice. Its extensive feature list, including mobile access and automation capabilities, supports larger or multi-department operations, especially if you value detailed tracking and trend analysis.
For small boutique hotels or properties emphasizing communication clarity, D-Edge’s simplicity and high satisfaction ratings make it the clear pick. Larger hotels or chains needing a comprehensive operational platform with extensive integrations should lean toward Quore.
D-Edge Dmbook boasts a user experience rated at 4.65 out of 5, with reviews praising its intuitive, web-based interface and ease of onboarding. Customers emphasize its straightforwardness, which helps staff adopt it quickly, often describing it as “the best little handover since the post-it.” However, some mention that a mobile app would improve usability further.
Quore’s UI scores slightly lower at 4.43 out of 5, with users appreciating its organization and mobile app but citing issues like slow load times and limited mobile functionality. Training is noted as sometimes insufficient, requiring more time for staff to fully utilize its extensive features. Edge: D-Edge.
D-Edge offers no unique features beyond basic communication and handover capabilities, focusing on simplicity. Quore surpasses this with over 24 features, including a lost & found module, CapEX budgeting, work orders, preventive maintenance, inventory analysis, and more, supporting a full range of operational needs.
While Quore’s features require more training, they enable detailed tracking and automation, which can improve efficiency at scale. D-Edge’s strength lies in its core function of communication and handover, making it ideal if you need a straightforward tool. Edge: Quore.
D-Edge’s support and onboarding ratings stand at 4.65 out of 5, with reviews highlighting their responsiveness and helpfulness. Clients appreciate the proactive customer service, noting that “the team has embraced the product,” and its responsiveness is a key reason for recommending the software.
Quore’s ratings are slightly lower at 4.36, with reviews praising support but mentioning some onboarding challenges. Users describe Quore’s support as “top notch,” yet highlight that initial training could be improved. Edge: D-Edge.
D-Edge connects to 115 verified partners, including PMS systems, revenue management, and other hotel tech providers, offering extensive integration options. Quore’s integration count is 8, focused mainly on guest messaging, reputation management, and some PMS connections, with many users citing limited PMS integration as a drawback.
If seamless system connectivity is crucial, D-Edge’s broader integration ecosystem offers a clear advantage. Quore’s integrations are more limited but cover core operational tools. Edge: D-Edge.
D-Edge’s users, mainly from independent and boutique hotels, rate it at 4.75/5, with recent reviews praising its reliability and ease of use. The high NPS score of 9.2/10 reflects strong customer satisfaction, especially in Europe and Asia-Pacific regions.
Quore’s ratings, mostly from larger chains and branded hotels, average 4.4/5, with recent reviews noting its comprehensive functionality but occasional issues with load times and onboarding. Its NPS score is slightly lower at 8.94/10.
Overall, D-Edge’s more recent and numerous reviews make it the higher-rated product.
D-Edge Dmbook charges a flat rate of $100 per month, with no free tier or trial. Quore’s pricing is higher at $200 per month, also without a free trial, focusing on larger operations needing extensive tools.
The price difference reflects Quore’s broader feature set, but D-Edge’s affordability and simplicity may appeal to smaller hotels or those prioritizing communication.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive operational management, inventory tracking, or maintenance automation.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks a simple communication tool or has budget constraints.
D-Edge Dmbook centers on improving internal communication through a focused, easy-to-use platform, excelling with high satisfaction ratings and strong support. It simplifies handovers, reduces errors, and enhances team responsiveness, making it ideal for boutique hotels and independents.
Quore offers a suite of over 30 tools tailored for larger properties or hotel groups that need detailed operational control, automation, and extensive integrations. Its feature breadth supports complex workflows, but with a steeper learning curve and higher price.
Choose D-Edge if your primary goal is reliable, straightforward communication; opt for Quore if your hotel demands a comprehensive, multi-functional management system.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者对 Quore 促进各部门无缝沟通、有效传递信息和缩短响应客户请求时间的能力表示赞赏。这大大减少了误解和延误,提高了整体团队协作和客户满意度。
用户发现 Quore 的跟踪和报告功能对于维护各种操作的日志非常有用,包括客人请求、维护和库存。这些功能有助于保存详细记录,从而有助于提高酒店运营的责任感和... 用户发现 Quore 的跟踪和报告功能对于维护各种操作的日志非常有用,包括客人请求、维护和库存。这些功能有助于保存详细记录,从而有助于提高酒店运营的责任感和效率。
酒店经营者对 Quore 的客户消息功能非常满意,该功能有助于直接与客户沟通并有效管理他们的请求。不过,一些用户建议进行改进,例如更好地与其他客户服务平台集... 酒店经营者对 Quore 的客户消息功能非常满意,该功能有助于直接与客户沟通并有效管理他们的请求。不过,一些用户建议进行改进,例如更好地与其他客户服务平台集成。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户强调 Quore 需要更多自定义选项,例如修改报告字段、定制仪表板以及与其他物业管理系统集成。缺乏自定义有时会限制软件满足特定酒店需求的有效性。
一些评论强调了 Quore 培训和入职流程存在的问题。用户发现培训不足,有时不够直观,导致新员工的学习难度很大。这妨碍了软件的初步采用和有效使用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。D-EDGE Dmbook 和 Quore 共享许多核心 Staff Collaboration Tools 功能,但各有独特的能力。D-EDGE Dmbook 提供 115 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Quore 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。D-EDGE Dmbook 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
D-EDGE Dmbook:否。Quore:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Staff Collaboration Tools 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。D-Edge 的 HT Score 为 0,Quore 的为 25。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问