The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,242 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 1,242 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,242 | 0 |
在分析了 1,242 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 Dormakaba Kaba Ltd 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s growth, efficiency, and guest experience. Cloudbeds PMS by Cloudbeds and dormakaba Ilc by Dormakaba Kaba Ltd both aim to streamline operations but serve vastly different hotel profiles and needs. While Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, integrated platform backed by thousands of recent reviews and high satisfaction, dormakaba Ilc remains a more niche, less-reviewed solution. Which aligns better with your hotel’s ambitions?
Cloudbeds is designed as an all-in-one hospitality engine, connecting operations, distribution, and revenue management in one system. It’s highly rated for ease of use, customer support, and extensive integrations, with over 1,071 reviews and a recent review count of 81 in the last six months—making its data more current and reliable. In contrast, Dormakaba Ilc has no reviews or recent user feedback, making it difficult to evaluate its real-world performance or suitability for your property.
Cloudbeds’ broad feature set includes channel management, booking engine, revenue tools, and a mobile app, supported by a robust partner network. Dormakaba Ilc lacks publicly available features or integrations, which suggests it might serve more specialized or hardware-focused security or access control functions rather than comprehensive PMS needs. Are you looking for a proven, reviewed platform or a less-tested solution?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable PMS that supports independent hotels, boutique properties, hostels, and vacation rentals—especially with a focus on growth, automation, and guest engagement—Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its high review count, recent positive feedback, and extensive feature set make it suitable for a wide range of property types.
Conversely, if your hotel primarily requires access control, security, or door locking systems, dormakaba’s Ilc might be more appropriate—but it’s not a true PMS. For a property management platform that actively drives revenue and improves operations, Cloudbeds offers more value and proven results. Which core needs align with your goals: growth and guest experience or security infrastructure?
Cloudbeds boasts an impressive ease-of-use score of 4.61/5 based on user reviews, with many praising its intuitive, user-friendly interface that simplifies daily tasks. The onboarding process is rated 4.45/5, and its support team is frequently praised for responsiveness. Multiple reviews highlight how staff can quickly adapt, reducing training time, and managing reservations and operations smoothly.
Dormakaba Ilc, with no publicly available reviews or ratings, provides no data on usability or support. Its interface and onboarding experience are unknown, making it impossible to compare directly. Given Cloudbeds’ proven user satisfaction, edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 64 exclusive features, covering everything from channel management, booking engine, revenue tools, guest communication, online check-in, integrations, analytics, and more. Its vast feature set is designed to grow with your hotel, offering tools for inventory, task management, automated reminders, digital registration, and integrated payment solutions.
Dormakaba Ilc has no publicly disclosed features or capabilities, which suggests it may focus on access control, security, or hardware management rather than comprehensive hotel operations. For a full-featured PMS that supports revenue growth and operational efficiency, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support is rated 4.41/5, with reviews highlighting attentive, quick, and empathetic service that enhances the user experience. Users frequently mention how the support team resolves issues promptly and supports onboarding, contributing to high retention and satisfaction.
Dormakaba Ilc has no available reviews or ratings for support, leaving its service quality uncertain. Without user feedback, Cloudbeds’ established support network makes it the safer, more reliable choice. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts over 190 verified partners, including popular integrations with OTA channels, payment gateways, CRM systems, and automation tools. This extensive network enables smooth operations for properties of all sizes and types, facilitating real-time synchronization and automation.
Dormakaba Ilc has only one verified partner—Yanolja Cloud Solution—indicating a very limited integration ecosystem. If your hotel relies on multiple connected systems, Cloudbeds’ vast marketplace offers unmatched flexibility. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ 4.63/5 overall rating, from over 1,071 reviews—including 81 recent ones—reflects strong, current user satisfaction across diverse property types like boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties. Hoteliers frequently mention its ease of use, support, and significant operational improvements.
Dormakaba Ilc, with no reviews or ratings, cannot be rated or compared. The lack of recent user feedback makes Cloudbeds the transparent, proven leader. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ pricing starts at $600/month, with no free tier or implementation fees, and includes a full suite of features suitable for various property sizes. Its transparent pricing aligns with its extensive capabilities.
Dormakaba Ilc does not publish pricing details or plans publicly, which suggests either custom pricing or a focus on hardware and access solutions rather than a subscription-based PMS. For budget and clarity, Cloudbeds’ predictable pricing offers better value. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds is a full-featured, highly-rated PMS trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide, with recent reviews confirming its ease of use, support, and extensive integrations. It caters to a wide range of property types looking to grow efficiently and deliver better guest experiences.
Dormakaba Ilc appears to be a niche, hardware-focused solution with no available user feedback, making it unsuitable for hotels seeking a comprehensive management platform. If your goal is operational efficiency, revenue growth, and guest satisfaction, Cloudbeds is the definitive choice.
For properties prioritizing security and access control, dormakaba might be relevant—but for the vast majority of hotels looking to streamline operations and scale, Cloudbeds remains the superior solution.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds PMS 和 dormakaba Ilc 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 52 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 dormakaba Ilc 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 dormakaba Ilc 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。dormakaba Ilc:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Dormakaba Kaba Ltd 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问