The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd 表现出色 .
Sirvoy 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
基于 HTR 上 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 105 |
在分析了 105 条经验证的评价后,Dormakaba Kaba Ltd 用户最看重其 ,而 Sirvoy 用户则强调 customer support, ease of use, 预订管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面和设计
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
功能限制
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和适应性
▾
|
|
|
−
性价比
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #27 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #27 0 条评价 |
You’re evaluating two property management systems (PMS) — Dormakaba Ilc by Dormakaba Kaba Ltd and Sirvoy — both designed to streamline your hotel's operations. Dormakaba Kaba Ltd’s offering, however, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction or effectiveness. Sirvoy, in contrast, has over 95 reviews, with 32 in the last six months, giving you a clearer picture of how it performs today. The choice hinges on experience, support, features, and ease of use—so which product truly benefits your hotel?
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd’s product is virtually unreviewed, with no available ratings or recent feedback. Sirvoy’s system, however, scores highly across multiple metrics, including a 4.64 out of 5 for ease of use, 4.85 out of 5 for customer support, and a 9.41/10 NPS score, reflecting strong recent consensus. While Dormakaba’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to assess user satisfaction or ongoing support quality, Sirvoy’s recent feedback confirms it’s well-liked, especially for its intuitive interface and support.
Both products aim to simplify property management, but Sirvoy’s active user base and recent reviews suggest it’s more proven in today’s market. Are you comfortable choosing a system with no recent feedback, or do you prefer one with current, positive user experiences?
If your hotel values an easy-to-use, feature-rich PMS with strong support and ongoing development, Sirvoy is the logical choice. It’s suited for small to medium properties needing streamlined booking, guest management, and channel integration, backed by hundreds of reviews and recent high ratings.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd’s offering isn’t backed by recent reviews or user ratings, so it’s difficult to recommend confidently. If your hotel requires a solution from a larger, globally present provider with a focus on security and infrastructure, that might be a factor—but without user feedback, certainty remains elusive. For most hoteliers, Sirvoy’s proven track record makes it the safer bet.
Sirvoy’s interface is rated 4.64 out of 5, praised for its intuitiveness and straightforward navigation. Many recent reviews emphasize how new users find it simple to learn, with onboarding averaging 4.6 out of 5, indicating that staff adoption is quick and problem-free. Conversely, Dormakaba Kaba Ltd’s ratings are unavailable, and no recent reviews exist to evaluate its usability or onboarding experience.
Given Sirvoy’s high usability scores and positive feedback, it’s clear that your team will spend less time learning the system and more time managing your property. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s system boasts 43 unique features, including multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, guest messaging, online check-in/out, integrated payment processing, and mobile access. It offers advanced capabilities like automated reminders, guest CRM, task management, and real-time reporting—features that can significantly boost operational efficiency.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd offers no documented features or integrations, making it impossible to compare on this front. Without available feature data, Sirvoy’s extensive and modern feature set gives it a decisive edge.
Sirvoy’s customer support receives a near-perfect rating of 4.85 out of 5, with recent reviews highlighting responsive, helpful, and prompt assistance. Users consistently describe their support as "excellent," with some explicitly saying it’s the best support they’ve encountered in online systems.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd’s support ratings are unavailable, and there are no recent reviews to gauge its support quality. The lack of recent feedback significantly diminishes confidence in its current support capabilities. Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy integrates with 21 verified partners, including major booking channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS systems, along with tools like TrustYou, Revinate, and Cloudbeds. These integrations support a seamless workflow for reservations, guest communication, and revenue management.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd has only one verified partner — Yanolja Cloud Solution — limiting its integration options significantly. For hotels seeking a platform that connects easily with existing tools, Sirvoy’s broader ecosystem makes it the superior choice. Edge: Sirvoy.
With 95 reviews, Sirvoy has a robust recent review pool and a high rating, especially among small to medium-sized hotels, B&Bs, and hostels. Hotels of various sizes, especially those seeking user-friendly systems with solid support, rate Sirvoy highly—many praise its ease of use and support quality.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd’s lack of reviews means no current user feedback or ratings are available, making it impossible to determine its reception among hoteliers. Given the detailed, recent positive reviews for Sirvoy, it’s clearly the preferred choice for current users. Edge: Sirvoy.
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd’s pricing details are unavailable, with no indication of setup fees, subscription costs, or trial options. In contrast, Sirvoy charges a $200 base price with no ongoing monthly fees, and offers a 30-day trial, providing transparency for budgeting.
While Dormakaba’s pricing remains unclear, Sirvoy’s straightforward pricing model and trial availability allow for easy evaluation and comparison. For budget-conscious hotels, Sirvoy’s clear price point offers peace of mind.
Not ideal if you prioritize ease of use, quick onboarding, or feature-rich flexibility. Dormakaba’s offering may involve complex implementation processes and limited current user feedback, making it less suitable for small or medium properties seeking immediate value.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive customizations, advanced reporting, or CRM features beyond what Sirvoy currently offers. Larger chains or enterprise properties needing complex integrations may find Sirvoy’s scope limiting.
Dormakaba Ilc promises a secure, enterprise-grade property management system, but no recent reviews or user feedback make it hard to recommend confidently. Without current data, it’s primarily suitable for large, established hotels with existing infrastructure and specific security needs.
Sirvoy offers a proven, easy-to-use platform with extensive features, excellent support, and a broad ecosystem of integrations. For small to medium-sized hotels seeking reliability, affordability, and rapid deployment, Sirvoy is the clear choice.
Choose Dormakaba if your priority is a large, security-focused system from a reputable provider, and you’re prepared for potentially complex onboarding. Opt for Sirvoy if you want a user-friendly, feature-rich system with recent positive feedback, strong support, and an active community. For most hoteliers, Sirvoy provides the certainty and confidence you need to enhance your operations today.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,dormakaba Ilc 和 Sirvoy 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 31 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。dormakaba Ilc 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。dormakaba Ilc 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
dormakaba Ilc:否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Dormakaba Kaba Ltd 的 HT Score 为 0,Sirvoy 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问