项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 713 条经验证的评价后,HOTELTIME 用户最看重其 工作流程效率与易用性, 支持与响应速度, 预订与房态管理,而 Sirvoy 用户则强调 客户支持和在线聊天, 易于使用且设置简单, booking and reservation management。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
工作流程效率与易用性
▾
|
+
客户支持和在线聊天
▾
|
|
+
支持与响应速度
▾
|
+
易于使用且设置简单
▾
|
|
+
预订与房态管理
▾
|
+
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
+
Channel manager and OTA connectivity
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
账单、发票和会计
▾
|
−
定制化和特定属性的灵活性
▾
|
|
−
客人档案与客人数据管理
▾
|
−
定价、费率、折扣和收益管理
▾
|
|
−
房价管理与定价控制
▾
|
−
账单、发票和付款
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 219 条评价 | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #3 238 条评价 | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 46 条评价 | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | #27 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 239 条评价 | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 241 条评价 | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 143 条评价 | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 49 条评价 | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #52 4 条评价 | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 384 条评价 | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 111 条评价 | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 21 条评价 | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Sirvoy hinges on your property’s specific needs and growth plans. Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations and improve guest experiences, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market focus. HotelTime boasts a comprehensive suite with deep integrations and a large review base, while Sirvoy emphasizes simplicity and affordability. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s current operations and future aspirations?
HotelTime PMS and Sirvoy both target hospitality providers seeking to streamline operations, but they solve different problems. HotelTime offers a broad, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and automation options, suited for large or complex properties. Sirvoy, by contrast, provides an easy-to-navigate, affordable system ideal for small to medium hotels that prioritize simplicity. Do you need a full-featured platform capable of supporting multiple revenue streams, or a straightforward system to manage reservations efficiently?
HotelTime’s strength lies in its scalability and depth, with over 650 properties across 20+ countries, many of which are resorts and large hotels. Sirvoy, with its 95 reviews mostly from small properties, focuses on ease of use and quick onboarding. The choice depends on whether your team values an all-in-one solution with advanced modules or a lean, user-friendly interface for everyday management.
If your hotel requires a feature-packed system with extensive integrations, automation, and support for complex operations, go with HotelTime PMS. Its robust functionalities include guest CRM, revenue management, integrated CRS, and spa & wellness modules, making it suitable for resorts, city hotels, and large properties. Conversely, if your hotel is small or mid-sized, prioritizes affordability, and needs straightforward reservation management, Sirvoy is the better fit. Its simple interface and strong support are ideal for properties that want to optimize booking workflows without complexity.
For properties aiming for growth or multi-department integration, HotelTime offers the necessary tools. If your primary concern is ease of use and cost-effectiveness, Sirvoy provides a quick start with minimal training. Your decision should align with your operational complexity and future expansion plans.
HotelTime PMS scores slightly higher in user ratings (4.66/5 vs. Sirvoy’s 4.64/5), with both systems praised for their intuitive designs. HotelTime’s onboarding is rated 4.63/5, with users highlighting its user-friendly interface and comprehensive training support. Sirvoy’s interface is straightforward, with many users citing its ease of navigation and quick setup, especially for those new to hotel management.
However, HotelTime’s broader feature set can introduce a steeper learning curve, especially when configuring modules like revenue management or automation. Sirvoy’s simplicity means your team can start using it rapidly, with less training required. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s platform boasts 38 shared features plus 13 exclusive functionalities like EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, ancillary revenue tracking, and mobile app support. These enable comprehensive management of guest profiles, on-site services, and revenue streams. Sirvoy, with only 5 unique features, primarily covers basic booking, channel management, and payment processing, lacking advanced modules like CRM or revenue management.
HotelTime’s extensive feature suite makes it a versatile solution capable of handling multiple operational aspects. Sirvoy’s core strength is its simplicity, but it may fall short on advanced needs. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support team is consistently rated 4.73/5, with reviews praising quick responses and detailed assistance. Clients appreciate their proactive onboarding and ongoing support, which helps maximize the platform’s capabilities. Sirvoy’s customer support is also highly rated at 4.85/5, with users commending its responsiveness, helpfulness, and personalized assistance.
While Sirvoy’s support is excellent, HotelTime’s larger customer base and more complex platform mean its support team often handles more intricate issues. Both are strong, but HotelTime’s extensive support network and detailed onboarding give it a slight edge. Edge: Sirvoy.
HotelTime’s reviews feature a high overall rating of 4.83/5 from 433 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its reliability and advanced features. Hotels across various segments, especially resorts and city hotels, rate it highly for operational support. Sirvoy, with only 95 reviews and a 0/5 overall rating (likely an error), appears less reviewed, but the reviews it does have praise its ease of use and support.
Given the larger, more recent review count, HotelTime’s ratings are more reliable and representative of its performance. Its broad market presence and positive feedback from diverse property types reinforce its leadership. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime PMS is priced at a flat $600 monthly fee, with no freemium or trial options. Its comprehensive feature set reflects a premium investment suitable for larger properties or groups. Sirvoy charges $200 monthly, with a 30-day trial, targeting smaller properties seeking an affordable entry point.
While HotelTime’s higher price offers more advanced capabilities, Sirvoy’s lower cost makes it attractive for startups or small hotels. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize features or budget constraints.
Hotels that should consider HotelTime include:
Not ideal if:
Hotels suitable for Sirvoy include:
Not ideal if:
HotelTime PMS offers a comprehensive, highly integrative platform built for larger and more complex properties. Its extensive features and broad market presence make it ideal for properties seeking scalability and deep operational control. Sirvoy remains a strong choice for small to mid-sized hotels that want ease of use, affordability, and quick deployment.
If your hotel aims to grow and needs advanced, multi-department management tools, HotelTime is the clear pick. For smaller properties or those prioritizing simplicity and cost-efficiency, Sirvoy fits better.
HotelTime’s larger review count, higher overall ratings, and recent positive feedback make it the more trusted choice. Its feature breadth and market presence give your team confidence in long-term support and scalability.
Ultimately, your decision should align with your property’s size, operational complexity, and growth plans. For most medium to large hotels, HotelTime provides the depth and coverage needed to elevate your operations.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
评论中的一个共同主题是,HotelTime通过简洁直观的工作流程,减少了前台、收银和多部门操作的日常工作量。即使用户整体评价系统,也有人指出,过多的点击、弹窗... 评论中的一个共同主题是,HotelTime通过简洁直观的工作流程,减少了前台、收银和多部门操作的日常工作量。即使用户整体评价系统,也有人指出,过多的点击、弹窗或繁琐的编辑流程可能会拖慢员工速度,使培训或高峰期操作变得比必要的更困难。
用户经常提到HotelTime的支持团队是其主要优势,描述为响应迅速、联系方便、专业,且常能立即解决问题。多篇评论表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,使PMS在日常... 用户经常提到HotelTime的支持团队是其主要优势,描述为响应迅速、联系方便、专业,且常能立即解决问题。多篇评论表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,使PMS在日常运营中更易依赖,尤其是在前台或财务工作中酒店需要快速答复时。
评测者一致认为 HotelTime 在预订创建、编辑、房间可用性和房间块管理方面操作简便、速度快。该 PMS 被视为一款提升预订准确性、支持团队预订、帮助员工实时管理... 评测者一致认为 HotelTime 在预订创建、编辑、房间可用性和房间块管理方面操作简便、速度快。该 PMS 被视为一款提升预订准确性、支持团队预订、帮助员工实时管理入住率的工具,从而减少错误并加快前台工作流程。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评价强调HotelTime的账单和开票流程是其实际优势,特别是在预付款单、发票、单据匹配和收银工作方面。然而,用户也指出在发票编辑、过账日记账、拆分账单、... 许多评价强调HotelTime的账单和开票流程是其实际优势,特别是在预付款单、发票、单据匹配和收银工作方面。然而,用户也指出在发票编辑、过账日记账、拆分账单、押金、货币处理和会计对账方面存在一些摩擦,表明这是一个价值很高但流程复杂的环节。
一小部分但重要的评论涉及客人档案的处理,包括偏好存储、重复档案、客人历史和与文件关联的数据。用户希望拥有更丰富的客人档案,以及更清晰的合并或搜索操作,... 一小部分但重要的评论涉及客人档案的处理,包括偏好存储、重复档案、客人历史和与文件关联的数据。用户希望拥有更丰富的客人档案,以及更清晰的合并或搜索操作,以便员工能更快地为回头客提供服务,而无需创建重复记录或进行额外的手动清理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy 的客户支持是其最显著的优势之一,用户对其快速响应、专业客服人员和真人在线聊天服务赞不绝口。许多评论指出,这种支持服务帮助他们快速解决问题、熟悉... Sirvoy 的客户支持是其最显著的优势之一,用户对其快速响应、专业客服人员和真人在线聊天服务赞不绝口。许多评论指出,这种支持服务帮助他们快速解决问题、熟悉系统,并避免系统宕机或代价高昂的错误。
用户反复表示,Sirvoy 易于上手、配置快捷、日常管理也十分便捷,即使是缺乏技术经验的业主也能轻松使用。评论者尤其赞赏它能减少培训时间和操作繁琐步骤,对于... 用户反复表示,Sirvoy 易于上手、配置快捷、日常管理也十分便捷,即使是缺乏技术经验的业主也能轻松使用。评论者尤其赞赏它能减少培训时间和操作繁琐步骤,对于小型物业和初次使用物业管理系统 (PMS) 的用户来说更是如此。
Reviewers consistently rely on Sirvoy to manage reservations, availability, and day-to-day booking workflows with less manual effort. They say it help... Reviewers consistently rely on Sirvoy to manage reservations, availability, and day-to-day booking workflows with less manual effort. They say it helps keep the calendar organized, simplifies handling room inventory, and makes it easier to run the property without double bookings or confusion.
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户喜欢 Sirvoy 能够适应不同的酒店类型和工作流程,但他们经常要求增加更多可配置的字段、颜色、房间类型和显示选项。他们反复提到,该产品在简单的操作中表现... 用户喜欢 Sirvoy 能够适应不同的酒店类型和工作流程,但他们经常要求增加更多可配置的字段、颜色、房间类型和显示选项。他们反复提到,该产品在简单的操作中表现出色,但更灵活的设置将有助于那些拥有特殊套餐、家庭套房或独特预订规则的酒店。
大量评论都集中在定价控制方面,用户希望获得更好的工具来设置季节性价格、折扣、套餐和追加销售。虽然有些人欣赏这种灵活性,但也有人认为价格设置不够便捷或过... 大量评论都集中在定价控制方面,用户希望获得更好的工具来设置季节性价格、折扣、套餐和追加销售。虽然有些人欣赏这种灵活性,但也有人认为价格设置不够便捷或过于死板,这使得收益优化和附加产品销售比预期更加困难。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HotelTime PMS 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HotelTime PMS 提供 60 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。HotelTime PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HotelTime PMS:否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。HOTELTIME 的 HT Score 为 92,Sirvoy 的为 90。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐