The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 549 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
easyGuestmanagement 表现出色 .
HOTELTIME 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 549 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 549 |
在分析了 549 条经验证的评价后,easyGuestmanagement 用户最看重其 ,而 HOTELTIME 用户则强调 user interface and learning curve, 技术支援, reporting and analytics。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
技术支援
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
移动优化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 219 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 238 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 46 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 7 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #5 239 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 241 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #4 143 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #4 49 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #52 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #2 384 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #5 111 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #1 21 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s efficiency, guest satisfaction, and growth. While easyGuestmanagement GmbH and HotelTime PMS both aim to streamline hotel operations, they diverge significantly in scope, user feedback, and market presence. easyGuestmanagement’s near-zero ratings and reviews contrast sharply with HotelTime’s extensive, recent feedback from hundreds of users. What's the better choice for your hotel today?
easyGuestmanagement appears to be a minimal or placeholder system with no publicly available ratings, reviews, or detailed feature sets. In contrast, HotelTime PMS has amassed over 430 reviews, with an overall rating of 4.83 out of 5, and recent reviews confirming its relevance and reliability. HotelTime’s high NPS score of 9.26/10 and 93% likelihood to recommend demonstrate a strong user trust. Given the absence of data or reviews for easyGuestmanagement, HotelTime clearly leads in proven performance and user confidence.
If your hotel needs a well-established, feature-rich PMS with global support and extensive integrations, HotelTime is the clear choice. Its proven track record across hundreds of properties, especially in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia Pacific, makes it suitable for hotels of all sizes, from boutique to large resorts. Conversely, if your team is exploring a scalable, automation-focused system with minimal complexity, easyGuestmanagement’s limited or non-existent information makes it a poor pick for serious hotel operations. Do you want a tested, comprehensive platform or a system with no available evidence of effectiveness?
HotelTime scores a 4.66 out of 5 in ease of use, with many reviews citing its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users appreciate how quickly staff adopt the system, often remarking on its simple navigation and minimal training requirements. EasyGuestmanagement, with no available user ratings, cannot be confidently compared; its lack of review data suggests it may not have been adopted or tested in real hotel environments. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 51 distinct features, including a booking engine, channel management, guest CRM, POS integration, automated night audit, and more—many of which are missing from easyGuestmanagement’s profile. Its broad suite enables comprehensive management of reservations, guest data, revenue, and operational tasks. easyGuestmanagement’s zero features or unique tools mean it cannot compete with HotelTime’s extensive capabilities. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s customer support scores 4.73 out of 5, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness, knowledgeable team, and helpful onboarding. Guests praise the quick, effective assistance that helps maximize platform use and resolve issues promptly. There is no available support or onboarding data for easyGuestmanagement, which indicates a lack of proven support infrastructure. Given the importance of support in operational-critical systems, HotelTime holds the advantage. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified integrations, including POS systems, revenue management tools, OTAs, and third-party analytics. Shared integrations with other systems and unique partnerships with Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR enhance its connectivity. easyGuestmanagement offers no verified integrations or third-party partnerships, limiting its extensibility. For a hotel needing a flexible, connected tech stack, HotelTime’s extensive integration options are compelling. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime enjoys a high overall rating of 4.83/5 from 433 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing operational improvements and excellent support. Its user base spans boutique hotels, resorts, city center properties, and large chains, with property types rating it consistently high (often 4.8+). EasyGuestmanagement has no reviews or ratings, making its reputation impossible to gauge. Based on available data, HotelTime’s ratings and recent reviews speak loudly. Edge: HotelTime.
easyGuestmanagement does not publicly disclose pricing, indicating it may be a minimal or custom offering with unclear value. HotelTime charges $600 per month, with no free tier or trial, but this fee covers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform used by hundreds of properties globally. Its pricing aligns with its extensive capabilities and support. Without clear data on easyGuestmanagement, HotelTime’s transparent pricing provides better value clarity.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that HotelTime offers a proven, feature-rich platform with extensive support and integrations, while easyGuestmanagement provides little to no publicly available data or customer validation. For hotels seeking reliability, scalability, and proven performance, HotelTime stands out. Its broad suite of features, recent reviews, and high customer satisfaction make it the clear choice.
Choose HotelTime if you value a system with a track record, strong support, and a wide range of functionalities. It’s a fit for hotels of all sizes that want operational control and growth potential.
Opt for easyGuestmanagement only if your priorities are undefined or limited, which is unlikely given the lack of evidence. For serious hotel management today, HotelTime remains the better, more dependable investment.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| easyGuestmanagement |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,easyGuestmanagement GmbH 和 HotelTime PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 39 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
虽然支持团队的响应速度和乐于助人的态度值得赞赏,但一些评论指出,延长技术支持时间将进一步提升用户体验,确保随时都能获得帮助,特别是对于国际用户而言。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。easyGuestmanagement GmbH 和 HotelTime PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。easyGuestmanagement GmbH 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelTime PMS 提供 58 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。HotelTime PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
easyGuestmanagement GmbH:否。HotelTime PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。easyGuestmanagement 的 HT Score 为 0,HOTELTIME 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问