The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 322 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) 表现出色 .
RMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Ancillary revenue tracking.
基于 HTR 上 322 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 322 |
在分析了 322 条经验证的评价后,Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) 用户最看重其 ,而 RMS 用户则强调 技术支持和学习资源, 可扩展性和功能深度, 信托会计支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
技术支持和学习资源
▾
|
|
|
+
可扩展性和功能深度
▾
|
|
|
+
信托会计支持
▾
|
|
|
+
在线渠道管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订引擎和移动界面
▾
|
|
|
−
报告编写者的灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
POS系统集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 147 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 102 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 14 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 8 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #11 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #13 57 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #9 50 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #3 65 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #11 63 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #23 20 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #12 10 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #8 7 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Engisoft by Enginyeria de Software (ENGISOFT) and RMS by RMS both aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge in scope, maturity, and user feedback. RMS enjoys a broad international presence and a large review base, making it a more tested choice, especially for complex or expanding properties. Engisoft, although less reviewed, offers a more focused solution that might suit smaller or more niche operations.
Both products address core PMS functions—reservations, billing, housekeeping—but RMS provides a much wider range of features, including booking engines, guest portals, and integrated POS systems. RMS’s more extensive feature set, combined with its recent growth and positive reviews, makes it a compelling option. But is it the right fit for your hotel? Let’s explore their differences in detail.
Engisoft is a cloud-based PMS designed to handle the essentials of property management with an emphasis on ease and simplicity. Its reviews highlight real-time data access and straightforward operations but note the absence of advanced features that larger or more complex properties might require.
In contrast, RMS offers a highly versatile platform with over 55 features, including booking engines, guest CRM, multi-currency support, and channel management. It supports a range of property types, from motels to resorts, and has a global footprint spanning 22 countries. RMS’s large review count (293 reviews) and recent feedback confirm its broad acceptance and ongoing development.
If your hotel needs a basic yet reliable system, Engisoft might suffice. But for those seeking more automation, integrations, and scalability, RMS’s extensive capabilities and recent positive reviews—particularly its 4.56/5 rating—make it the stronger choice. Are you looking for a simple solution or a scalable platform that grows with your business?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive platform with extensive automation, RMS is the clear winner. It’s ideal for hotels that need detailed reporting, integrated channel management, guest profiles, and online check-in features, especially if you operate multiple properties or target international guests.
On the other hand, if your hotel values straightforward operations with essential PMS functions—perhaps a small boutique or a single-property operation—Engisoft’s simpler interface and narrower feature set could meet your needs. However, RMS’s larger user base, especially in the motel and resort segments, suggests it is better suited for hotels aiming to scale or add advanced functionalities.
Given RMS’s strong recent reviews and higher overall rating, it’s the more future-proof choice unless your hotel’s needs are very basic. Ready to decide based on your growth ambitions?
Engisoft’s experience ratings are not available, but its lack of recent reviews and limited features suggest a simpler, less modern interface. RMS, rated 4.28/5 for ease of use by nearly 300 reviewers, is praised for its intuitive booking chart, mobile-friendly design, and quick onboarding process. Users highlight its straightforward navigation and helpful onboarding resources.
Review quotes for RMS emphasize its user-friendly nature: “Very user friendly software” and “The easiest onboarding process I’ve had.” RMS’s focus on usability, combined with robust support, makes it a better choice if ease of operation is a priority.
Edge: RMS.
RMS offers a staggering 55 features, including booking engine, guest CRM, multi-lingual support, integrated POS, guest messaging, and automated reminders—features that Engisoft does not provide at all. Engisoft’s feature set appears limited to core property management functions, with no dedicated modules for marketing, online check-in, or guest engagement.
For properties seeking a full suite of tools to automate and enhance guest interactions, RMS’s extensive features are a critical advantage. Its ability to manage multi-currency transactions, online check-in, and guest communication makes it more adaptable for modern hospitality needs.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s support ratings (4.48/5) are slightly higher than Engisoft’s (0/5), but the latter lacks recent reviews to gauge current support quality. RMS’s users frequently praise its proactive, knowledgeable team and quick response times, with quotes like “Support team is very helpful and quick to respond.”
Engisoft, due to its minimal reviews, has no recent data to evaluate support. Given RMS’s large, recent review base, it’s clear that RMS provides support that hoteliers find helpful and reliable.
Edge: RMS.
RMS boasts 112 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, Criton, and Sage. It also offers extensive connection points for PMS, channel management, POS, and guest engagement, making it highly flexible.
Engisoft’s limited partner count—only 8 verified integrations—restricts its ability to connect with other systems. If seamless integrations are vital for your operations, RMS’s broader partner ecosystem offers a significant advantage.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s overall rating of 4.56/5 and NPS score of 8.51/10 reflect strong user satisfaction. Its reviews consistently mention ease of use, support, and feature depth, especially among motels, resorts, and boutique hotels.
Engisoft’s lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating indicate a lack of verified customer satisfaction data, disfavoring it in comparison. RMS’s recent positive feedback makes it the clear favorite for hoteliers prioritizing reliability and support.
Edge: RMS.
Engisoft’s pricing information is unavailable, suggesting it may be custom or on request, which can be a barrier for smaller hotels. RMS charges $800 per month, with no free tier or trial, but this fee covers a wide array of features and support.
Given RMS’s transparent pricing and extensive feature set, it offers clear value for properties seeking a comprehensive PMS solution. Engisoft’s pricing ambiguity might be a concern unless you’re already familiar with its cost structure.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
RMS and Engisoft both serve core property management functions, but RMS’s broader feature set, support, and recent reviews position it as the superior choice for most hotels. RMS’s extensive integrations, scalability, and user satisfaction ratings make it well-suited for hotels seeking growth and automation.
Choose RMS if you prioritize a feature-rich, well-supported system that can scale with your business. Opt for Engisoft only if your hotel’s needs are minimal, operations are simple, and budget constraints are tight.
In summary, RMS’s large review base, recent positive feedback, and comprehensive functionality make it the recommended option for hotels ready to upgrade their management platform. Engisoft might suffice for very small, basic operations but falls short for growth-oriented properties.
Note: This comparison is based on the latest review data and feature analysis. As always, consider your specific needs and test each solution where possible before making a final decision.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Engisoft 和 RMS 共享 19 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 43 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功... RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功能的效用。
RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务... RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务等。这种全面性使酒店能够有效地简化各种运营流程。
用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能... 用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能显著降低了操作复杂性,使物业经理能够专注于其他关键任务。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
预订系统评价褒贬不一,用户呼吁提升其功能完善度和移动端友好性。建议包括简化预订流程,并考虑为回头客提供免费预订服务,以增强客户忠诚度并促进重复消费。
尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而... 尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而无需从头开始重新构建报表。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Engisoft 和 RMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Engisoft 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RMS 提供 112 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Engisoft:否。RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Enginyeria de Software S.A. (ENGISOFT) 的 HT Score 为 0,RMS 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问