The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
HIS MSC Company Limited 表现出色 .
Infor 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 47 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 47 |
在分析了 47 条经验证的评价后,HIS MSC Company Limited 用户最看重其 ,而 Infor 用户则强调 易于使用, 报告, 一体化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
报告
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化
▾
|
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持
▾
|
|
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #44 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #25 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #28 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 26 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #31 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #24 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Epitome PMS by HIS-MSC and Infor HMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management tasks, but their core strengths and weaknesses vary significantly. HIS-MSC’s epitome PMS offers limited data backed by no recent reviews, making it hard to assess its current performance. Conversely, Infor HMS shines with over 46 recent reviews, a high overall rating, and a broad feature set that addresses many operational facets.
Are you looking for a cloud-based, feature-rich PMS that’s been tested and reviewed by many hoteliers recently? Or do you prefer a system that’s less documented and primarily used in specific regions? Let’s explore these options further.
HIS-MSC epitome PMS is a longstanding product designed for hospitality management, but it currently has no recent reviews, scores, or user feedback. Its lack of available data means you cannot reliably gauge its current usability, support quality, or feature updates. In contrast, Infor HMS has 46 reviews published within the last six months, boasting a 4.04/5 overall rating, making it far more transparent and user-validated.
While HIS-MSC aims to serve the hospitality industry globally, its limited recent data raises questions about ongoing support and development. Infor, on the other hand, is a well-established global provider with a broader market presence and recent positive user feedback. Given the recent reviews, Infor’s system appears more proven and reliable for your hotel’s needs today.
If your hotel requires a flexible, cloud-based PMS with extensive features and active support, Infor HMS is the clear choice. Its 46 recent reviews and 4.04/5 rating indicate widespread user satisfaction, especially among independent and boutique hotels. Its robust feature set, including housekeeping, guest profiles, revenue management, and integrations, makes it suitable for mid-sized to larger hotels.
HIS-MSC epitome PMS might appeal if you prioritize regional solutions or have existing infrastructure built around it, but the lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes it a riskier choice. If you need proven support and ongoing updates, go with Infor.
Based on recent reviews, Infor HMS is generally considered intuitive, scoring 3.88/5 for ease of use, with users describing its navigation as straightforward once familiar. Support and onboarding are rated 4.04/5, with reviewers praising responsiveness and helpfulness. Some users mention that the interface could be more visually appealing, but overall, it’s seen as accessible.
HIS-MSC epitome PMS offers no recent review data or ratings, making it impossible to assess its user-friendliness today. Without current feedback, we have no basis to compare ease of use directly. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers at least 20 distinct features that HIS-MSC epitome PMS does not, including a housekeeping module, guest profiles, online support, multi-lingual capabilities, revenue management, automated night audit, and integrations with over 113 partners. Its features cater to operational automation and guest personalization, with a dedicated mobile app and cloud deployment.
HIS-MSC epitome PMS’s feature set is not documented or comparable, with no data on unique or advanced functionalities. Given Infor’s extensive feature list and proven integration capabilities, it clearly outperforms in this area. Edge: Infor HMS.
Without recent reviews for HIS-MSC, support quality remains unverified. Infor HMS, however, consistently receives praise for responsiveness and professionalism, scoring 4.04/5 on support ratings. Multiple reviewers mention that support teams guide them effectively through issues and implementation, which is crucial for smooth operations.
While HIS-MSC’s support quality is unknown, the recent positive feedback for Infor suggests it’s better equipped to assist your team when problems arise. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified partners, including major booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, enabling seamless reservation management and operational workflows. Shared integrations with HIS-MSC are not documented, and HIS has no verified partners listed.
The extensive integration ecosystem of Infor HMS makes it more adaptable for hotels seeking automation and connectivity. HIS-MSC's limited data makes it difficult to assess integration capabilities. Edge: Infor HMS.
Due to HIS-MSC’s absence of recent reviews, it has no current ratings or user feedback to consider. Infor HMS, on the other hand, has a rating of 4.04/5 from 46 recent reviews, with 74% likelihood to recommend among hotelier respondents.
Support, usability, and feature satisfaction are reflected positively in Infor’s reviews, especially for boutique and independent hotels. HIS-MSC's lack of recent feedback makes it impossible to determine current user sentiment. Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for HIS-MSC epitome PMS are not publicly available, and there’s no indication of trial periods or flat fees. Infor HMS similarly does not publish specific pricing but appears to operate on custom quotes, typical of enterprise systems.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your hotel should contact vendors for quotes based on size and needs. Price differences are uncertain, so focus on value from features and support.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes recent support, extensive features, or global integrations. HIS-MSC’s limited recent data suggests it’s a less suitable choice for modern, tech-savvy hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel operates very regionally with little need for integrations or if you prefer a system with a simpler, less feature-heavy interface. Smaller boutique hotels might find Infor’s complexity unnecessary.
The core difference between these systems is that Infor HMS is a well-established, feature-rich, and actively reviewed platform, while HIS-MSC epitome PMS lacks recent user feedback and detailed documentation. If your hotel demands a modern, integrated, and supported solution, Infor is the safer bet.
Choose Infor HMS if your hotel needs comprehensive features, strong support, and active development. Its broad market presence and recent positive reviews make it a clear choice for hotels seeking operational efficiency and guest personalization.
Opt for HIS-MSC epitome PMS only if regional support, existing infrastructure, or specific legacy needs outweigh the benefits of recent data-backed reviews. Otherwise, Infor offers greater peace of mind, proven performance, and more extensive capabilities today.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,epitome PMS (by HIS-MSC) 和 Infor HMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。epitome PMS (by HIS-MSC) 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。epitome PMS (by HIS-MSC) 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
epitome PMS (by HIS-MSC):否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HIS MSC Company Limited 的 HT Score 为 0,Infor 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问