The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 169 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
E&S Kassensysteme 表现出色 .
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
基于 HTR 上 169 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 169 |
在分析了 169 条经验证的评价后,E&S Kassensysteme 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 用户界面和报表, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| E&S Kassensysteme |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和报表
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
操作改进
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店POS系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | E&S Kassensysteme |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 44 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 94 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 9 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | E&S Kassensysteme |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 74 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 41 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 31 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #2 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | E&S Kassensysteme |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 14 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #2 130 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #5 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #6 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right POS system for your hotel hinges on several factors. Both E&S Kassensysteme Picasso and Mews POS aim to streamline sales, inventory, and operational management, but they diverge significantly in user experience, features, and market presence. With the overwhelming number of options, your decision should favor the product backed by recent, positive reviews and broader adoption.
Mews POS, with over 150 reviews and a 95% likelihood to recommend, currently stands out as the more trusted solution. Does your hotel prioritize a proven, well-supported platform, or are you open to a more niche, less-reviewed option?
E&S Kassensysteme Picasso is tailored as a retail and hospitality POS, focusing on transaction and inventory management. Its core strength lies in its straightforward, robust transaction handling, primarily suited for hotels that need a reliable, no-frills system with simple sales processing.
Mews POS, on the other hand, integrates seamlessly with property management, offering extensive features like digital ordering, inventory management, and guest engagement tools. It’s designed for hotels seeking a unified platform that boosts operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
While E&S Kassensysteme provides a basic, functional POS, it lacks the modern, feature-rich environment that Mews offers. The question becomes: do you need a dependable transaction system or a comprehensive, all-in-one operational platform?
If your hotel requires a straightforward, physical POS designed mainly for retail transactions and inventory control, E&S Kassensysteme may meet your needs. It’s suitable for small hotels or those with minimal F&B requirements, focusing on basic sales.
However, for hotels looking to offer digital menus, online ordering, integrated guest profiles, and advanced reporting—especially with a desire for multi-device usability—Mews POS is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set and high user ratings make it ideal for mid-sized to large properties or those planning to scale.
For hoteliers prioritizing quick deployment with minimal complexity, E&S Kassensysteme may suffice. But if your goal is to provide a modern guest experience and detailed operational insights, Mews is more aligned with your ambitions.
E&S Kassensysteme’s review profile indicates a lack of recent data, but its core design suggests a focus on basic functionality, which can be simple for trained staff. Its interface and onboarding process are not prominently rated, implying it may not excel in ease of adoption or usability.
Conversely, Mews scores a 4.74/5 in ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive, modern interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users highlight how quickly new staff can be trained and how easily staff can access functions across devices.
Edge: Mews.
E&S Kassensysteme offers essential POS functions but lacks advanced operational features, with no additional capabilities reported. Its feature set is limited, focusing primarily on basic sales and inventory management.
Mews provides 29 distinct features, including PCI compliance, discounts, upselling, digital menus, mobile ordering, inventory and ingredient management, recipes, analytics, and integrations with accounting software. These features enable a holistic approach to hotel F&B operations and revenue management.
Edge: Mews.
There are no recent reviews or ratings available for E&S Kassensysteme’s customer support, making it difficult to gauge its responsiveness or quality. Its lack of recent feedback suggests limited market engagement or support resources.
Mews boasts a 4.43/5 support rating, with reviews describing their support team as reliable, solution-oriented, and responsive. Hoteliers appreciate the onboarding assistance, especially given the platform’s extensive features.
Edge: Mews.
E&S Kassensysteme has zero verified integration partners, offering no indication of compatibility with other hotel or POS systems. This limits its ability to connect with existing hotel tech stacks.
Mews integrates with 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and payment systems like Criton and Right Revenue. This extensive ecosystem supports streamlined operations and data consolidation.
Edge: Mews.
With 156 reviews and recent feedback, Mews’s ratings are significantly higher across all metrics—most notably a 9.32/10 NPS and 95% likelihood to recommend. Users frequently praise its user-friendliness, feature set, and support.
E&S Kassensysteme has no recent reviews, and the absence of ratings suggests very limited or no current user engagement. This makes Mews the clearly favored choice among active hotel operators.
Edge: Mews.
E&S Kassensysteme does not publicly list pricing, implying a custom quote approach likely based on hotel size or requirements. Its lack of a free trial or transparent costs suggests a traditional license model.
Mews charges a $200 monthly base fee, with no implied setup or implementation costs, and offers no free trial. Its transparent pricing model simplifies budgeting for hotels considering this platform.
E&S Kassensysteme is best suited for straightforward transactional environments rather than integrated, guest-centric operations.
Mews is designed for hotels aiming for a modern, integrated technological approach.
Mews POS stands out as the more comprehensive, well-supported solution, especially given its large user base and recent positive reviews. Its feature-rich environment and seamless integrations make it suitable for hotels that want more than just a basic sales tool.
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable platform with proven support and extensive integrations, go with Mews. Its ease of use, recent reviews, and broad market presence make it the clear choice.
However, if your hotel’s needs are strictly transactional, with no plans for digital ordering or guest engagement, E&S Kassensysteme may suffice—though its lack of recent reviews and features makes it less appealing for most modern properties.
In summary, for most hotels looking to improve guest experience and operational efficiency, Mews offers a safer, more future-proof investment. Prioritize Mews if you want a platform that’s already proven its value with recent, high-rated customer feedback.
酒店POS系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| E&S Kassensysteme |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,E&S Kassensysteme Picasso 和 Mews POS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | E&S Kassensysteme |
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款日志报告 | ||
| 折扣和促销 | ||
| 支票拆分 | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 追加销售 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 17 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Mews 的界面被描述为现代且直观,便于用户流畅操作。然而,一些评论指出,其报告工具在复杂性和灵活性方面仍有改进空间,尤其是在多物业设置和详细的运营洞察方... Mews 的界面被描述为现代且直观,便于用户流畅操作。然而,一些评论指出,其报告工具在复杂性和灵活性方面仍有改进空间,尤其是在多物业设置和详细的运营洞察方面。
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
该平台因其丰富的自定义选项而备受赞誉,用户可以通过定制工作流程和提醒来提升宾客体验。然而,用户也表示需要更直观的自定义功能,以满足特定的运营需求和宾客... 该平台因其丰富的自定义选项而备受赞誉,用户可以通过定制工作流程和提醒来提升宾客体验。然而,用户也表示需要更直观的自定义功能,以满足特定的运营需求和宾客互动。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。E&S Kassensysteme Picasso 和 Mews POS 共享许多核心 Hotel POS Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。E&S Kassensysteme Picasso 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews POS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews POS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
E&S Kassensysteme Picasso:否。Mews POS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel POS Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。E&S Kassensysteme 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问