The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Etstur |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Etstur |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Etstur |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #14 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel’s revenue and guest experience. Both Etstur and Roiback aim to streamline bookings and improve direct sales, but they diverge sharply in capabilities, market presence, and user feedback. Your decision hinges on whether you need a local, minimal-feature platform or a globally trusted solution packed with advanced features.
Etstur offers a travel management platform with no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess its current performance. Roiback, by contrast, boasts over 43 recent reviews, a 4.72/5 customer support rating, and a 90% likelihood to recommend, positioning it as the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven results.
Both platforms target hotels looking to boost direct bookings, but they serve different hotel profiles. Etstur, with no recent reviews or verified ratings, appears to be a less active or less widely adopted solution, which can raise concerns about ongoing support and feature updates.
Roiback, with a solid 43 reviews in the last six months and a high NPS score of 9/5, demonstrates recent customer satisfaction and active market presence. Its extensive feature set, including multi-lingual support, booking abandonment recovery, and detailed reporting, surpasses what Etstur offers.
In essence, if your hotel prioritizes a well-supported, feature-rich booking engine with recent user validation, Roiback is the clearer choice. Are you prepared to go with a less proven platform, or do you want a solution backed by recent hotelier feedback?
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich booking engine with global reach, go with Roiback. It offers 36 unique features, including multi-lingual support, social media integration, and conversion rate reports, making it suitable for hotels aiming to optimize online revenue.
If your priority is a simple, regional platform with minimal features and limited market presence, Etstur might be considered. However, its lack of recent reviews and verified ratings makes it a risky choice for hotels seeking reliable, ongoing support.
For property types like luxury hotels, boutique hotels, and international resorts, Roiback’s extensive features and global presence offer a significant advantage. Smaller, local hotels might consider Etstur if they only need basic functionality, but the lack of recent feedback diminishes confidence.
Roiback's average ease of use rating is 4.49/5, supported by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and smooth onboarding process. Users highlight its user-friendly booking engine, customizable options, and quick responsiveness, making staff adoption straightforward.
Etstur, with a 0/5 rating, provides no recent or verified user feedback, making it impossible to assess its usability. The absence of detailed reviews suggests it may lack the intuitive design and support needed for efficient onboarding.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback offers a diverse suite of 36 features, including mobile optimization, urgency messaging, multi-room bookings, rate comparison widgets, Google Hotel Ads, social media integrations, loyalty program support, and multiple payment gateways. These functionalities support complex marketing and sales strategies.
Etstur provides no documented features beyond basic booking functionality, with no recent updates or enhancements. Its limited feature set makes it unsuitable for hotels wanting to leverage advanced online booking tools.
Given the expansive capabilities of Roiback, it clearly leads in feature richness. Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s recent reviews consistently praise its support team, with an average rating of 4.72/5 and comments highlighting responsiveness, expertise, and personalized consulting. Hoteliers report that support has been instrumental in achieving their sales and operational goals.
Etstur, with no recent reviews, offers no verifiable support ratings or feedback. This lack of recent customer input raises concerns about ongoing support quality and responsiveness.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback integrates with 27 verified partners, including major channel managers, PMS providers, and tech platforms like GuestCentric, Triptease, and Winhotel. These integrations streamline operations and improve data consistency across systems.
Etstur has zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with third-party systems or streamline operational workflows. For hotels relying on multiple tech partners, this significant gap favors Roiback.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s recent reviews—over 43 in the last six months—reflect a high level of satisfaction, with many praising its features, support, and results. Its NPS score of 9/5 confirms strong customer loyalty and advocacy.
Etstur has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current hotelier sentiment. The lack of recent feedback diminishes confidence in its ongoing performance.
Edge: Roiback.
Etstur does not publicly disclose pricing information, suggesting it may be custom or regional. Without transparent pricing, budgeting becomes difficult.
Roiback charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no trial or freemium options, offering predictable costs. Its pricing aligns with its feature set and market positioning.
For hotels seeking transparent, predictable pricing, Roiback’s model provides clarity. Etstur’s opaque pricing remains a drawback.
Not ideal if...
Given the lack of recent reviews, Etstur is best suited for small, local hotels with minimal ambitions for online growth.
Not ideal if...
Roiback’s rich feature set and recent strong reviews make it suitable for mid to large hotels that prioritize growth and operational efficiency.
The core difference lies in market reach, features, and customer validation. Roiback is a global, feature-rich platform backed by recent reviews, high support ratings, and proven hotel success stories.
Choose Roiback if your hotel needs a flexible, scalable, and well-supported booking engine capable of handling complex needs, international guests, and multi-channel integrations. Its extensive features and recent positive feedback make it the clear leader.
Opt for Etstur only if your hotel is small, local, and has no immediate plans for growth or digital sophistication. Its lack of recent reviews and limited features make it a risky choice for hotels aiming to modernize and expand.
In summary, for most hotels seeking a reliable, feature-rich booking engine today, Roiback is the safer, smarter investment.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Etstur 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Etstur 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Roiback | Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Etstur:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Etstur 的 HT Score 为 0,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问