The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 251 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Eved 表现出色 .
Tripleseat 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Contact Management/CRM and PCI Compliant Payments.
基于 HTR 上 251 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 251 |
在分析了 251 条经验证的评价后,Eved 用户最看重其 ,而 Tripleseat 用户则强调 onboarding and support, event management efficiency, user-friendly interface。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Event Management Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform Customization
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Proposal and Communication Tools
▾
|
|
|
−
文档管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 活动管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 52 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 152 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 17 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 9 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 155 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 93 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 55 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #2 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 224 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #4 8 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #4 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Eved by Eved and Tripleseat by Tripleseat hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for event management. Both aim to streamline event processes, but they serve different aspects of hotel operations—Eved focuses on corporate event spend management, while Tripleseat emphasizes sales, catering, and client communication. Your decision should be guided by whether your priority is financial transparency or operational efficiency.
Eved targets enterprise-level corporations seeking strict spend control and procurement automation. In contrast, Tripleseat is designed for hotels aiming to improve event sales, guest interactions, and internal collaboration. Which of these core goals aligns better with your hotel’s strategic priorities?
Eved and Tripleseat both aim to improve how hotels manage events, but their approaches differ significantly. Eved offers a specialized platform for large corporations to handle event payments, procurement, and spend transparency, making it ideal for brands with complex billing needs. Meanwhile, Tripleseat covers broader event management, including sales pipelines, client communication, and space booking, suited for hotels with a focus on increasing event revenue.
Eved’s niche is in streamlining spend and procurement processes for large-scale corporate events, but it lacks a review count and recent feedback, which weakens confidence. Tripleseat, with over 219 reviews and recent 62 updates, demonstrates a strong market presence and consistent user satisfaction, especially among mid-sized hotels. Given the volume and recency of Tripleseat reviews, it clearly holds a more reliable reputation.
If your hotel needs a robust sales and event catering platform to manage client relationships, space bookings, and team collaboration, go with Tripleseat. It boasts 11 exclusive features like contact management, task reminders, and digital signatures, making it ideal for sales teams and operations staff. Conversely, if your hotel is part of a corporate group needing detailed spend analysis, invoice reconciliation, and procurement oversight, Eved’s spend management capabilities are more relevant.
For hotels prioritizing client communication and seamless event sales workflows, Tripleseat is the clear choice. If financial transparency, spend control, and automation are your main concerns, Eved’s specialized focus could be more beneficial.
Tripleseat scores a 4.53/5 in ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users mention that the platform simplifies complex event management tasks and facilitates better team coordination, with comments like, “It’s so easy to respond to leads and communicate within the platform.” Eved’s ratings are nonexistent, but the lack of recent reviews and the absence of a user feedback score suggest it may not be as user-friendly or widely adopted.
Given Tripleseat's high review count and recent positive feedback, the platform appears more accessible for staff training and daily operations. Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat offers 11 exclusive features, including contact management, task management, eSignatures, diagramming, and seating management—tools that directly support sales and event planning. Eved, on the other hand, lacks any listed features beyond its core spend management focus, with no verified integrations or add-ons.
For your hotel, the comprehensive suite of sales and event features in Tripleseat makes it more adaptable to diverse event scenarios. Eved’s niche focus on billing and procurement limits its feature set, providing less operational flexibility.
Tripleseat’s support ratings are 4.55/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses and helpful onboarding assistance. Reviewers note, “Their support team is responsive and willing to educate,” boosting confidence in ongoing assistance. Eved has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality.
Given Tripleseat's consistent positive feedback and recent review activity, it offers more reliable support. Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat integrates with 15 verified partners, including WebRezPro, Stayntouch, Stripe, and Oracle Hospitality, offering a broad ecosystem for hotel operations. Eved, with zero verified integrations, limits connectivity to other hotel or event management tools.
If seamless data flow and system interoperability are important, Tripleseat provides more options. Its extensive partner network enhances your hotel’s ability to unify sales, reservations, and financial systems. Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat enjoys a 4.78/5 overall rating, based on 219 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, strong support, and feature richness. Hotel segments like boutique hotels and independent properties rate it highly, with many praising its efficiency and user-friendliness.
Eved’s ratings are nonexistent or zero, indicating no recent reviews or user feedback. The lack of data makes it impossible to compare, but the overwhelming recent support for Tripleseat suggests it is the more trusted product currently.
Eved’s pricing is undisclosed, suggesting a custom quote based on your needs. Tripleseat charges a flat $400 monthly fee, with no mention of tiered plans or additional costs.
For budget planning, Tripleseat’s transparent pricing makes it easier to evaluate ROI. Eved’s custom pricing could be advantageous for large corporations but less predictable for typical hotel budgets.
Not ideal if you focus primarily on leisure, boutique, or small-scale events, or if you need extensive sales and client management features.
Not ideal if your primary goal is spend management or procurement automation, as Tripleseat focuses on sales and event logistics.
The core difference between these two products is their focus: Eved excels in spend and procurement management, while Tripleseat leads in sales and event operations. Given the more recent reviews, higher ratings, and broader feature set, Tripleseat currently holds a significant advantage for most hotels.
Choose Eved if your hotel’s main challenge is financial transparency, invoice reconciliation, and spend control, especially within large corporate events. Opt for Tripleseat if your goal is to improve sales processes, client communication, and event logistics, with a focus on increasing revenue and operational efficiency.
Overall, Tripleseat’s extensive reviews, recent updates, and feature richness make it the more reliable and versatile choice for most hotel operations today.
活动管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Eved 和 Tripleseat 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理(任务和提醒) | ||
| 内容和文件管理 | ||
| 可定制的 BEO、提案和合同文件 | ||
| 客户沟通门户 | ||
| 潜在客户表格 | ||
| 联系人管理/CRM |
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Tripleseat provides the best ROI of any system."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Despite some initial onboarding challenges, users commend the support team for their responsiveness and effectiveness in solving issues and providing... Despite some initial onboarding challenges, users commend the support team for their responsiveness and effectiveness in solving issues and providing assistance throughout the setup process.
Tripleseat is praised for streamlining event management, making it easier to handle communication, details, and coordination across teams, leading to... Tripleseat is praised for streamlining event management, making it easier to handle communication, details, and coordination across teams, leading to time savings and better team alignment.
Reviewers consistently mention the ease of use and intuitive design of Tripleseat, highlighting its capacity to simplify complex tasks and improve use... Reviewers consistently mention the ease of use and intuitive design of Tripleseat, highlighting its capacity to simplify complex tasks and improve user experience for both clients and staff.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
While users appreciate the platform's core features, they express a desire for better integration with other systems like revenue management tools and... While users appreciate the platform's core features, they express a desire for better integration with other systems like revenue management tools and billing to enhance overall workflow efficiency.
Tripleseat simplifies creating proposals and facilitates consistent client communication with features like integrated communication tools and real-ti... Tripleseat simplifies creating proposals and facilitates consistent client communication with features like integrated communication tools and real-time updates across platforms.
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Eved 和 Tripleseat 共享许多核心 Event Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Eved 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Tripleseat 提供 15 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Tripleseat 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Eved:否。Tripleseat:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Event Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Eved 的 HT Score 为 0,Tripleseat 的为 97。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问