The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 54 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 8 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #18 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 41 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 38 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 21 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 142 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #33 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #29 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ PMS by eviivo and GODO hinges on your property's needs, operational priorities, and growth ambitions. Both aim to streamline property management, but they differ significantly in maturity, features, and user feedback. For hoteliers seeking a proven, well-supported system, eviivo's extensive review base and established presence make it a more reliable choice today.
While GODO offers automation and AI-driven insights, its lack of recent reviews and limited feature set currently put it behind eviivo in terms of trust and proven performance. Are you ready for a software with a track record of success, or are you exploring a newer solution still proving its mettle?
Both products address key hotel management challenges—streamlining reservations, guest communication, and multi-channel distribution. eviivo's platform is designed for a broad range of accommodations, from B&Bs to resorts, with a focus on ease of use and strong integrations. GODO, on the other hand, concentrates more on vacation rentals and automation, leveraging AI for review management.
eviivo boasts a high rating of 87 on the HotelTechReport score, with 191 recent reviews, reflecting a large and active user base. GODO has no reviews or ratings available, indicating limited user validation and a need for time to build reputation. The question is, do you prefer a product with proven user satisfaction or one still establishing its presence?
If your hotel needs a full-featured PMS with extensive integrations, ease of onboarding, and a global presence, go with eviivo. It’s suited for a wide variety of property types, from independent B&Bs to larger resorts, with over 28,000 accommodations using the platform.
If your focus is on automating vacation rentals or leveraging AI for guest reviews and insights, GODO might seem appealing, but its current lack of user feedback makes it a less reliable option. Given the maturity, eviivo’s proven track record and comprehensive feature set make it the safer choice for most hoteliers.
eviivo has a user rating of 4.43 out of 5 for ease of use, backed by 191 reviews, many praising its intuitive interface and onboarding support. Reviewers frequently highlight the platform's straightforward reservation management, centralization capabilities, and helpful customer support. The mobile app is praised for enabling management on-the-go, with some users noting ongoing improvements are needed.
GODO’s ease of use cannot be accurately assessed, as it has no recent reviews or user ratings available. Without this data, it’s impossible to gauge how intuitive or user-friendly the platform is for your team.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo offers 34 shared features, including a revenue management module, guest CRM, online check-in/out, integrated payment terminals, and task management—features GODO currently lacks entirely. Its 17 exclusive features cater to comprehensive property management, from automation to guest engagement tools.
GODO’s feature set appears limited, with no unique features listed beyond basic automation and review analysis. Its narrower scope could hinder complex property management needs.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s customer support scores 4.42 out of 5, with reviews frequently mentioning quick, helpful responses and strong onboarding assistance. Hoteliers appreciate the support team’s responsiveness, especially during initial setup and troubleshooting, which enhances overall satisfaction.
GODO has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality. Without user feedback, there’s no evidence to suggest whether GODO provides comparable assistance.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo boasts 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Booking.com, Expedia, and Airbnb, along with specialized integrations such as TripAdvisor, D-Edge, and Canary Technologies. It offers broad connectivity, empowering your hotel to manage multiple channels efficiently.
GODO has only 5 verified partners, with limited shared integrations like Profitroom. Its narrower ecosystem could restrict your connectivity options, especially if you rely on certain OTAs or channel managers.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s recent reviews consistently highlight its ease of use, reliability, and customer support, with a review count of 191 over the last six months. Hotels across various segments, especially B&Bs and vacation rentals, praise its efficiency, with many noting significant time savings and operational improvements.
GODO lacks recent reviews, feedback, or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of eviivo’s reviews, it’s clear that most hoteliers prefer or at least trust the platform more at this stage.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo charges a base price of $700, with no mention of additional implementation or monthly fees, offering a predictable cost structure. GODO is priced at $1,100, but details about ongoing costs or additional charges are not specified.
While GODO’s higher initial fee might reflect a focus on automation and AI features, the lack of transparent pricing transparency makes it harder to evaluate value. eviivo's more affordable and straightforward pricing adds confidence in its ROI.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
eviivo’s platform is a comprehensive, trusted property management system backed by over 190 recent reviews and a global footprint. Its extensive features, broad integrations, and positive user feedback make it the clear choice for most hoteliers today.
GODO offers promising automation and AI tools but lacks recent user validation and a broad feature set, making it less suitable for operational needs at this stage. Its current limited reputation and smaller ecosystem mean it’s better suited for early adopters experimenting with automation for vacation rentals.
If your hotel prioritizes reliability, proven support, and extensive functionality, eviivo is the recommended choice. For those willing to wait for GODO’s growth and more user feedback, it could develop into a valuable automation tool in the future. But for now, eviivo’s track record keeps it ahead.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 GODO 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GODO 提供 5 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。GODO:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 87,GODO 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问