The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 1,450 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 eviivo 用户则强调 响应式客户支持, 入职专业知识, 技术效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
响应式客户支持
▾
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
+
入职专业知识
▾
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
+
技术效率
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
+
预订和预约效率
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
−
改进建议
▾
|
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
定制和功能开发
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #15 54 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #23 23 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #20 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | #18 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #19 41 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #16 38 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #19 21 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #10 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #15 39 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #6 142 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | #33 2 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #29 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and eviivo Suite™ hinges on your specific operational needs, scale, and growth ambitions. Both systems address core property management challenges—reservation handling, channel distribution, and guest communication—but they diverge in complexity, integrations, and target user base. Cloudbeds is often favored by hotels seeking an all-in-one, scalable platform, while eviivo caters to a broad spectrum of independent and small multi-property operators. Which system aligns better with your growth plans?
Both Cloudbeds and eviivo aim to streamline property management and booking processes. Cloudbeds offers a unified platform that combines PMS, booking engine, and extensive integrations, making it ideal for growth-oriented hotels. Meanwhile, eviivo focuses on a diverse range of accommodations, emphasizing seamless online booking and guest communication. Do you need a flexible, scalable platform that supports complex operations or a straightforward system for smaller, independent properties?
If your hotel prioritizes a comprehensive, integrated system with strong revenue management and scalability, Cloudbeds is the better fit, especially given its 1071 reviews and a 4.63/5 overall rating. For properties that value simplicity, strong OTA integrations, and excellent customer support, eviivo's 191 reviews and high responsiveness are compelling. For larger or expanding hotels, Cloudbeds' extensive integrations and features make it the clear leader; for small rentals or boutique inns, eviivo offers an accessible, reliable solution.
Cloudbeds boasts a user rating of 4.61/5 and is praised for its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface that even non-technical staff find easy to navigate. Its onboarding process, rated at 4.45/5, is generally smooth, though some users note initial setup complexity. Conversely, eviivo scores 4.43/5 for ease of use, with many users highlighting its straightforward operation and mobile app. However, some reviews mention room for interface improvements and less flexibility. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 51 shared features plus 13 exclusive ones, including inventory management, analytics dashboards, multi-lingual support, and a spa & wellness module—features absent in eviivo. eviivo’s key strengths lie in its streamlined reservation system, AI-powered guest messaging, and robust OTA integrations, but it lacks the extensive management tools Cloudbeds provides. For advanced operational control, Cloudbeds has the edge.
Both platforms are praised for responsive support; Cloudbeds’s support is rated 4.41/5, with reviewers citing prompt, empathetic assistance that enhances user experience. eviivo scores similarly at 4.42/5, with many users emphasizing its dedicated onboarding and ongoing support, particularly helpful during integrations. However, recent reviews for Cloudbeds reflect a slight advantage, especially in handling complex issues quickly. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds connects with 190 verified partners, including key players like Experience Hotel, Tripadvisor, and PayPal, along with a marketplace for third-party apps. eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia and Airbnb, but offers less extensive connectivity. For properties relying on a broad ecosystem of integrations, Cloudbeds’ larger partner network makes it the preferred choice.
Cloudbeds’s recent reviews, with 81 in the last six months, overwhelmingly praise its ease of use, scalability, and features, reflected in an overall rating of 4.63/5. eviivo’s reviews, though positive, are fewer and older, with a rating of 0.93/5—indicating limited recent customer feedback and potential usability concerns. For current user satisfaction, Cloudbeds clearly leads.
Cloudbeds charges a $600 monthly base fee with no implementation or additional setup costs, positioning it as a premium solution for larger properties. eviivo’s pricing starts at $700 per month, with no additional fees, often appealing to small-to-mid-sized operators seeking affordability. Exact costs depend on property size and requirements, but Cloudbeds offers more scalable, feature-rich packages suited for growth.
Hotels that should consider Cloudbeds:
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, low-cost system for minimal properties or require offline capabilities during internet outages.
Hotels that should consider eviivo:
Not ideal if you require deep operational analytics, extensive management tools, or plan rapid scaling beyond a handful of properties.
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive, scalable management system with an emphasis on integration, revenue optimization, and growth. Its 1071 recent reviews and high ratings underscore its reliability and user satisfaction, especially for larger or expanding hotels.
Choose Cloudbeds if you value a flexible, feature-rich platform that grows with your property portfolio, supports sophisticated revenue strategies, and offers extensive third-party integrations. Its interface and onboarding are generally straightforward, with a support team that responds quickly to complex issues.
Eviivo, on the other hand, excels in simplicity, guest communication, and OTA connectivity, especially suitable for small properties, B&Bs, and holiday rentals seeking ease of operation. Its lower recent review count and older feedback suggest it’s best for properties prioritizing straightforward booking management over extensive operational controls.
In conclusion, for hoteliers with growth ambitions and complex management needs, Cloudbeds remains the superior choice backed by recent reviews and higher ratings. For small, independent operators focused on guest communication and ease of use, eviivo continues to serve as a dependable, straightforward platform.
我们分析了 16 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 eviivo Suite™ PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,eviivo 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问