The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 54 条评价 | #60 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 8 条评价 | #52 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #18 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 41 条评价 | #60 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 38 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 21 条评价 | #56 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 39 条评价 | #40 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 142 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #33 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #29 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ PMS by eviivo and Hilton OnQ hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. eviivo, with its extensive review base and recent positive feedback, offers a versatile, cloud-based solution suited for independent hotels and vacation rentals, while Hilton OnQ is an in-house system optimized for Hilton’s large property portfolio. Both aim to streamline operations but diverge significantly in features, ease of use, and market focus.
Your team must evaluate which system aligns best with your current needs and future goals. Is seamless guest management your priority, or do you need a system tailored specifically to Hilton properties?
eviivo Suite™ and Hilton OnQ both address core property management needs—reservations, guest communication, and channel distribution—yet they differ starkly in execution. eviivo’s cloud-based platform centralizes management for independent hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals across multiple countries, with over 191 recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use, customer support, and comprehensive features. Hilton OnQ, in contrast, serves Hilton’s internal ecosystem, with limited public reviews and no recent feedback, indicating a lack of external validation or updates.
The main divergence is market focus: eviivo targets small to medium properties seeking flexibility and automation, while Hilton OnQ is designed for large, standardized hotel chains within Hilton’s proprietary infrastructure. Does your hotel operate independently or as part of a larger brand?
Hilton OnQ’s limited review presence suggests it’s less transparent and less adaptable to non-Hilton properties, whereas eviivo’s recent reviews highlight ongoing improvements, making it a safer choice for independent hoteliers. Would you prefer a third-party SaaS solution with user reviews or an in-house system designed exclusively for Hilton?
If your hotel needs a flexible, easy-to-implement system that supports multiple property types, including vacation rentals, boutique hotels, and inns, eviivo Suite™ is the clear winner. Its user rating of 4.43/5 and 191 recent reviews showcase widespread satisfaction, especially among independent operators. The platform’s 51 unique features—including channel management, revenue tools, and guest communication—offer broad operational control.
Conversely, Hilton OnQ’s primary audience is Hilton’s internal franchisees and large-scale properties. Its lack of public reviews and unclear feature set suggest it’s tailored for internal use rather than external hotelier adoption. If you’re running an independent or smaller hotel, eviivo’s proven track record and feature set make it the right choice.
If your hotel is part of Hilton or plans to join a global franchise, Hilton OnQ’s integration with Hilton’s systems might be advantageous, though limited external feedback indicates it may not be as user-friendly or innovative.
In summary: For independent hotel operators, vacation rentals, or boutique properties, go with eviivo. For Hilton franchisees or large chain hotels already integrated into Hilton’s infrastructure, Hilton OnQ may be suitable, yet transparency and reviews are lacking.
eviivo Suite™ scores a 4.43/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and mobile app capabilities. Users frequently highlight its low learning curve and strong customer support that helps teams adopt features quickly. The onboarding process is rated at 4.38/5, and support staff are lauded for responsiveness, enabling smooth implementation.
Hilton OnQ’s usability is harder to gauge due to the absence of recent reviews or detailed feedback. Its interface, built in-house, was criticized in a 2022 review for being outdated (“designed in the 90s”) and not optimized for modern workflows. The lack of external validation and user feedback suggests it’s less user-friendly for hoteliers outside Hilton’s internal ecosystem.
Edge: eviivo. Its recent, detailed reviews and high ratings make it the more accessible and user-friendly choice for most hotels.
eviivo Suite™ offers a comprehensive suite of 51 features, including channel management, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, online check-in/out, payment processing, and mobile apps. Its features directly support operational efficiency, marketing, and guest communication, with real-time status updates and automation tools.
Hilton OnQ, by comparison, has no publicly listed features or third-party integrations, and no documented suite of tools beyond basic reservation and guest management. As a proprietary system, it’s likely to be limited to Hilton’s internal processes, without the extensive customization or third-party integrations available in eviivo.
Edge: eviivo. Its extensive feature set, including channel management and automation, surpasses Hilton OnQ’s limited, internal functionality.
eviivo’s customer support scores 4.42/5, with recent reviews describing support as responsive and helpful, especially during onboarding. Reviewers appreciate dedicated assistance, quick problem resolution, and ongoing help, which contribute to a smoother experience.
Hilton OnQ’s support details are less accessible, with no recent reviews or public feedback. The longstanding criticism of Hilton’s broader technology infrastructure hints at potential support challenges, and the lack of external user insights suggests it’s managed internally with limited external support channels.
Edge: eviivo. Its recent, positive reviews and support ratings make it the more reliable option for hoteliers seeking assistance.
eviivo’s recent reviews indicate a 95% likelihood to recommend, with an overall rating of 0.93/5 and a strong NPS score of 8.87/5. Hoteliers across various segments, especially independent hotels and vacation rentals, praise its ease of use, support, and feature breadth.
Hilton’s internal system has no recent independent reviews, and publicly, Hilton’s reputation for technology support is mixed at best. The only feedback available criticizes Hilton’s outdated infrastructure, with no indication of user ratings or satisfaction metrics.
Edge: eviivo. Its substantial volume of recent, positive reviews and recommendations clearly favor eviivo for hoteliers.
eviivo charges a $700 monthly fee, with no free tier, implementation fees, or trial period. This flat rate covers access to its extensive features and support, providing predictable expenses for small to medium properties.
Hilton OnQ’s pricing structure is not publicly available, and as an in-house system, costs are likely embedded within franchise fees or internal budgets. External hoteliers cannot subscribe to Hilton OnQ directly, limiting transparency.
In summary: eviivo’s transparent, flat-rate pricing makes it easier for hotels to budget, while Hilton OnQ’s costs are internal and opaque to outside operators.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in scope and flexibility. eviivo Suite™ is a third-party SaaS platform optimized for independent and small to medium properties, offering a broad feature set, ease of use, and recent positive reviews. Hilton OnQ is an in-house system built specifically for Hilton properties, likely providing seamless integration within Hilton’s ecosystem but with limited external transparency and fewer user-facing features.
Choose eviivo Suite™ if you value a versatile, widely adopted platform with proven support and features that can grow with your hotel. It’s the better choice for independent hoteliers seeking automation, guest communication, and multi-channel management.
Opt for Hilton OnQ only if your hotel is part of Hilton’s franchise network and you need deep, proprietary integration. However, be aware of the limited external feedback and potential outdated infrastructure that might hinder usability.
This comparison aims to clarify which system best suits your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth strategy. Given the recent reviews and widespread adoption, eviivo Suite™ emerges as the stronger, more reliable choice for most independent and small chain hoteliers.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 Hilton OnQ 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hilton OnQ 提供 6 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 1.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。Hilton OnQ:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 87,Hilton 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问