The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
eviivo 表现出色 在 响应式客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Kwentra 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Lobby Kiosk.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 54 条评价 | #68 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | #50 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 8 条评价 | #29 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #18 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 41 条评价 | #52 3 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 38 条评价 | #49 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 21 条评价 | #58 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 39 条评价 | #66 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 142 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #33 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #29 1 条评价 | #9 6 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system, your hotel’s needs hinge on operational efficiency, ease of use, feature set, and support quality. eviivo Suite™ and Kwentra aim to streamline your management tasks, but they differ significantly in reviews, regional presence, and feature focus. Your decision should reflect whether you prioritize a widely adopted, proven platform or a more niche, flexible solution. Which platform aligns better with your current operations and future growth plans?
eviivo Suite™ has established itself as a popular choice globally, especially in the UK and Europe, with a 93% overall rating based on 191 reviews. Its extensive feature set, including integrations with major OTAs and over 42 shared features, makes it a versatile tool for multiple property types—primarily vacation rentals and B&Bs. In contrast, Kwentra boasts a near-perfect 5/5 rating from six reviews, mainly in Europe, Middle East, and Asia Pacific, with a focus on resorts, hostels, and boutique hotels.
eviivo’s user feedback emphasizes its ease of booking management, guest communication, and centralized task handling, supported by dedicated mobile apps and AI-powered messaging. Conversely, Kwentra’s reviews highlight its helpful support team, comprehensive reporting, and integration with legacy systems, but lack recent user feedback to validate its current performance. Do you prefer a system with proven global presence or a newer, specialized platform?
If your hotel manages multiple properties or caters to vacation rentals, eviivo’s broad adoption and extensive integrations make it the safer choice. Its existing customer base of over 28,000 accommodations and high ratings for onboarding, customer support, and ease of use demonstrate a reliable, scalable solution. For property portfolios needing streamlined booking, billing, and channel management, eviivo’s proven track record is compelling.
Kwentra is better suited if your hotel values a flexible, scalable environment with a focus on integrations with legacy systems and a high level of personalization. Its niche focus on resorts, boutique hotels, and properties in the Middle East and Asia Pacific offers a tailored experience, especially if you require features like ID scanning and rules-based room assignment. However, the lack of recent reviews makes it harder to assess its current performance reliability. Which profile matches your hotel’s scale and regional needs?
eviivo’s ease of use scores a solid 4.43/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive booking and billing interfaces, alongside comprehensive onboarding support. Its mobile app is well-regarded, enabling management from anywhere, which is a significant advantage for busy hoteliers. Users highlight its straightforward setup and reliable customer support, with some noting the interface could still improve.
Kwentra scores slightly higher at 4.83/5, and its users emphasize its helpful support team and simplified operations, especially for integrating legacy systems. However, with only six recent reviews, this score might not reflect the current user experience. The platform’s focus on flexibility might introduce complexity for new users unfamiliar with legacy system integration. Edge: Kwentra.
eviivo offers a richer feature set, with 42 shared features and 9 exclusive to its platform, including native email marketing, guest SMS messaging, housekeeper mobile apps, shift planning, and PCI compliance. These features facilitate direct guest communication and operational automation, making it a comprehensive management tool for diverse property types.
Kwentra provides a more targeted set of features, including integrated ID & passport scanner, rules-based room assignment, lobby kiosk, and legacy system integrations. While these are valuable for specific property types, its smaller suite of 5 unique features limits its scope for broader use cases.
Edge: eviivo, due to its extensive feature set and integrations.
eviivo’s customer support scores 4.42/5, with numerous reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Testimonials mention dedicated support staff, like Mr. Guetif and Xavier, who assist during critical setup phases, helping users maximize the platform’s potential.
Kwentra’s support ratings are not explicitly available, but user testimonials highlight its “helpful team” and “quick responses,” suggesting a solid support experience. Still, the limited volume of reviews makes it difficult to definitively compare. Given eviivo’s extensive user base and recent review activity, it maintains the edge.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo boasts 32 verified partners, including major OTAs and tech providers like Expedia, Booking.com, TripAdvisor, and PriceLabs, offering extensive connectivity. Its wide-ranging integrations streamline distribution and revenue management, reducing manual work.
Kwentra connects with 18 verified partners, notably including Expedia, SiteMinder, Vingcard, and Onity, with some integrations tailored to legacy systems. While capable, its integration ecosystem is smaller, and its focus may be more niche.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo has a substantial review count (191) with recent positive feedback, particularly from vacation rentals, B&Bs, and independent hotels. Its ratings for ease of use, support, and ROI consistently remain above 4.2/5, with 95% likelihood of recommendation, indicating strong user satisfaction.
Kwentra’s six reviews all rate it 5/5, mainly from boutique hotels and resorts, but the small sample size limits broad applicability. Given the recent review volume and scores, eviivo’s reputation is more reliable.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s pricing starts at $700 per month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade positioning. Its pricing model suggests a premium, comprehensive solution suitable for hotels that appreciate extensive features and integrations.
Kwentra’s pricing details are not publicly available, which may complicate budgeting but could offer flexibility for specific property sizes. Its lack of transparent pricing suggests a need for direct inquiry.
Not ideal if you operate a very small boutique hotel in a niche regional market with minimal distribution needs or limited tech support requirements.
Not ideal if you need a highly reviewed, widely adopted platform with extensive third-party integrations or a large user community.
eviivo’s core difference lies in its extensive adoption, broad feature set, and international presence, making it suitable for hotels seeking a reliable, scalable management platform. It excels at connecting properties with OTAs, automating communications, and supporting diverse property types.
Choose eviivo if your hotel needs proven track record, numerous integrations, and a wide support network to streamline operations and maximize revenue. Its recent reviews and large user base give it a definitive edge over Kwentra.
Kwentra is better if your hotel values deep customization, legacy system integration, and regional-specific features within a smaller, targeted ecosystem. Its high ratings from users in niche markets suggest it’s a strong fit for specialized properties.
However, with more recent and plentiful reviews, eviivo clearly stands out as the more reliable and tested option for most hotels aiming for growth and operational efficiency.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 kwentra 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 kwentra 提供 18 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。kwentra:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 87,Kwentra 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问