The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 54 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 8 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #18 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 41 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 38 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 21 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 142 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #33 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #29 1 条评价 | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that streamlines operations, enhances guest communication, and supports growth. Both eviivo Suite™ and Luopan Arcas PMS aim to address these needs, but they diverge significantly in maturity, user feedback, and feature depth. eviivo’s platform, with a proven track record and extensive recent reviews, clearly outperforms Luopan in terms of user satisfaction and real-world application.
Are you looking for a system that’s been tested across diverse markets and properties, or are you willing to gamble on a less proven platform? The choice is clear once you consider review volume, support, and regional presence.
eviivo Suite™ and Luopan Arcas PMS both serve the hospitality industry, but their focus and market maturity differ markedly. eviivo is a long-established, cloud-based platform with over 191 recent reviews, a high overall rating, and a strong presence in North America, Europe, and beyond. It offers an extensive suite of features, including channel management, revenue management, guest CRM, and integrated payment processing, all designed for independent hotels, B&Bs, vacation rentals, and small to medium properties.
Luopan, by contrast, is relatively newer, with no recent reviews or customer feedback available, and a limited global footprint. Its core promise revolves around centralizing hotel operations, particularly for medium to large hotels and groups, but a lack of review data makes assessing its real-world reliability difficult. Do you want a platform that’s trusted and proven, or something still gaining ground?
If your hotel primarily manages small properties, B&Bs, vacation rentals, or independent accommodations, eviivo’s extensive features and proven performance make it the best choice. Its 191 reviews—including recent ones—highlight ease of use, strong support, and seamless integration with OTAs, making it ideal for small operators seeking reliability and growth.
Luopan, on the other hand, targets larger hotels and hotel groups needing an integrated, scalable solution with advanced back-office tools. However, without recent reviews or customer insights, it’s difficult to confirm if it meets the same level of real-world performance. For smaller, independent hotels, eviivo is the safer bet.
eviivo receives a high ease-of-use score of 4.43/5, with positive reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface, mobile app, and straightforward onboarding process. Users frequently mention that staff adoption is smooth, and the platform’s mobile capabilities allow management from anywhere, which is vital for busy hotel teams.
Luopan has not publicly shared user ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability. Given eviivo’s strong recent feedback, it is clear that this platform is easier for your team to implement and operate.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo offers 51 features exclusive to its platform, including channel management, revenue optimization, online booking engine, guest CRM, automated marketing, and mobile check-in, among others. These features are crucial for independent hotels and small groups seeking a one-stop solution to manage reservations, guest communication, and revenue.
Luopan’s core offerings include reservations, front desk, guest profiles, reporting, and mobile tools but lack a comparable breadth of features. With no verified partners or unique functionalities highlighted, the platform appears less feature-rich and less proven in diverse operational areas.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s customer support scores 4.42/5, with recent reviews praising their responsiveness and onboarding assistance. Hoteliers frequently mention that support staff, like Joseph and Xavier, go above and beyond to resolve issues quickly, which is critical during implementation and daily operations.
Luopan has no available reviews or customer feedback, making it impossible to gauge support quality. Based on the available data, eviivo’s support is a clear advantage.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs and channel managers like Expedia, Booking.com, Tripadvisor, and D-Edge. Its extensive API ecosystem allows for flexible customization and expansion, supporting diverse operational needs for small and medium properties worldwide.
Luopan has zero verified integrations or third-party partner data available. This significantly limits its interoperability and flexibility, especially if your hotel relies on multiple systems.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s recent review count of 191, with a 95% likelihood of recommendation, demonstrates strong user satisfaction. Hotels of various sizes, especially vacation rentals and B&Bs, praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Luopan’s lack of reviews and ratings makes it impossible to assess user satisfaction or property-specific feedback. Clearly, eviivo’s proven reputation and recent reviews make it the superior option.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo charges a base fee of $700 per month, with no trial or implementation fees, and offers a straightforward subscription model. Pricing details for Luopan are unavailable, which may indicate a customized or enterprise-level quote.
Given the transparent, predictable pricing of eviivo, your hotel can better plan and evaluate ROI. Without clear pricing for Luopan, assessing value is difficult.
Not ideal if your property is a large international chain or requires highly customizable, enterprise-grade solutions not offered by eviivo.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, independent, or prefers an established platform with extensive user reviews and proven support.
eviivo offers a well-rounded, proven platform with extensive recent reviews, high user satisfaction, and a broad feature set. Its global presence and integrated partner ecosystem make it suitable for small and mid-sized properties aiming for growth and operational efficiency.
Luopan presents a promising but less proven alternative, mainly suited for larger hotels or hotel groups willing to invest in a newer, unreviewed system. Its lack of recent reviews, community feedback, and integration options make it a riskier choice.
If your hotel values reliability, comprehensive features, and ongoing support, eviivo is the clear choice. For larger operations with complex needs and a focus on customization, Luopan might be worth exploring further once it builds more user credibility.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 Luopan Arcas PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Luopan Arcas PMS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。Luopan Arcas PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 86,Luopan 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案