The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 209 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
eviivo 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Marriott International 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 209 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 208 | 1 |
在分析了 209 条经验证的评价后,eviivo 用户最看重其 响应式客户支持, 入职专业知识, 技术效率,而 Marriott International 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应式客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
入职专业知识
▾
|
|
|
+
技术效率
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和预约效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进建议
▾
|
|
|
−
定制和功能开发
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 54 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | #59 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 8 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #18 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 41 条评价 | #68 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 38 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 21 条评价 | #60 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 39 条评价 | #43 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 142 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #33 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #29 1 条评价 | — |
When choosing a property management system, your hotel needs software that simplifies operations, improves guest experience, and offers reliable support. eviivo Suite™ by eviivo and FOSSE by Marriott both aim to streamline hotel management, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly. eviivo targets independent hotels, vacation rentals, and small-to-mid-sized properties, while Marriott’s FOSSE primarily serves large hotels within its global network. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s size and operational needs?
Both eviivo Suite™ and FOSSE are designed to improve hotel operations, but they diverge in scale, usability, and feature depth. eviivo offers a highly rated, user-friendly platform with an emphasis on booking, guest communication, and channel management, supported by extensive reviews from users in recent months. Conversely, FOSSE, Marriott’s proprietary system, appears less reviewed, with limited recent feedback, and is tailored for large-scale Marriott properties. Do you prioritize ease of use and modern integrations or a system aligned with a global hotel chain?
If your hotel is an independent operation, small chain, or vacation rental, eviivo Suite™ is the clear choice. It’s rated highly for ease of use (4.43/5), customer support (4.42/5), and recent reviews emphasize its ability to streamline bookings and guest communications. For hotels seeking a scalable, customizable system with features like channel management and integrated revenue tools, eviivo’s 191 recent reviews and a 95% likelihood to recommend make it the safer bet.
FOSSE, with its limited review data and a 2/5 overall rating, seems less suited unless you are part of the Marriott ecosystem or seeking a system that’s heavily integrated into Marriott’s global infrastructure. Its lack of recent reviews and low customer satisfaction scores point to a less reliable experience outside Marriott’s large properties. Would you prefer a platform with a proven track record in independent hospitality?
eviivo receives a 4.43/5 rating for ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and mobile app, making daily management simple. Customers praise its straightforward reservation process, real-time updates, and helpful onboarding support, which minimizes staff training time. Conversely, FOSSE scores poorly at 2/5, with reviewers describing it as "menu heavy," "key-stroke intensive," and "not user-friendly," especially for staff without extensive technical background. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo offers an expansive feature set, including channel management, revenue management, integrated booking engine, guest CRM, automated messaging, and real-time reporting — totaling 51 unique features. These tools cater to independent hotels and vacation rentals aiming to streamline operations and enhance guest relationships.
FOSSE provides core hotel functions like reservations, check-ins, billing, and maintenance, but lacks the extensive feature count and innovation seen in eviivo. Its limited capabilities and absence of detailed feature data suggest it’s less comprehensive. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s support scores 4.42/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness, onboarding assistance, and ongoing customer service. Clients frequently mention staff like Mr. Guetif and Xavier for their helpfulness, which is critical for independent hotels needing quick resolutions.
FOSSE’s customer support data isn’t available, but given Marriott’s size and the absence of recent testimonials, it likely relies on internal support channels that may not match eviivo’s responsiveness. For small to mid-sized hotels, dedicated support is essential. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo boasts 32 verified partners, integrating with major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, Airbnb, TripAdvisor, and specialized tools such as Guestline, eRevMax, Canary Technologies, and more. This extensive network allows independent hotels to synchronize rates, availability, and guest data efficiently.
FOSSE, with only 2 verified partners and one shared integration (Actabl), offers limited connectivity outside Marriott’s ecosystem. Its integration capabilities are less flexible for independent operators or those needing broad third-party connections. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s recent reviews showcase a 95% likelihood to recommend, and a 20-review count in the last six months underscores its current relevance. Hotels across segments like vacation rentals and boutique hotels give it high marks, praising its ease of use, automation, and support.
FOSSE’s reviews, or lack thereof, don’t provide recent or detailed ratings. With only one hotel review rating 2/5 and no recent feedback, it’s clear eviivo’s user base perceives it more favorably. For your hotel, recent positive ratings matter more. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo charges a flat monthly fee of $700, with no implementation or trial fees, making costs transparent and predictable. Its pricing includes a comprehensive feature set suitable for small to medium properties.
Marriott’s FOSSE pricing isn’t publicly disclosed, and as a proprietary system, costs are likely embedded within Marriott’s corporate structure, often unavailable to non-Marriott hotels. Its value is tied to Marriott’s ecosystem rather than standalone pricing. For independent hotels, eviivo’s transparent fee structure offers clear value.
eviivo Suite™ is a feature-rich, user-friendly platform backed by current, positive reviews, making it a strong choice for independent and small-to-mid-sized hotels. Its extensive integrations, dedicated support, and recent review volume give it a clear edge in reliability and usability.
FOSSE, by comparison, is a system designed for large Marriott hotels. Its limited recent feedback and low ratings suggest it’s less suited for standalone hotels or those outside the Marriott ecosystem.
Choose eviivo if you need a versatile, easy-to-use platform with proven support and features. Opt for FOSSE only if your hotel is part of Marriott’s extensive network and you prioritize Marriott’s internal system over third-party solutions.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 FOSSE 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 39 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 FOSSE 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 FOSSE 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 2.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。FOSSE:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 87,Marriott International 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问