The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 530 条经验证的评价后,eviivo 用户最看重其 响应式客户支持, 入职专业知识, 技术效率,而 RMS 用户则强调 技术支持和学习资源, 可扩展性和功能深度, 信托会计支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应式客户支持
▾
|
+
技术支持和学习资源
▾
|
|
+
入职专业知识
▾
|
+
可扩展性和功能深度
▾
|
|
+
技术效率
▾
|
+
信托会计支持
▾
|
|
+
预订和预约效率
▾
|
+
在线渠道管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进建议
▾
|
−
预订引擎和移动界面
▾
|
|
−
定制和功能开发
▾
|
−
报告编写者的灵活性
▾
|
|
−
POS系统集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 54 条评价 | #7 147 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | #8 102 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 8 条评价 | #8 14 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #18 2 条评价 | #7 8 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 41 条评价 | #11 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 38 条评价 | #13 57 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 21 条评价 | #9 50 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | #3 65 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 39 条评价 | #11 63 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 142 条评价 | #23 20 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #33 2 条评价 | #12 10 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #29 1 条评价 | #8 7 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can shape your hotel’s efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue streams. Both eviivo Suite™ PMS and RMS aim to streamline operations, but their approaches and strengths differ sharply. Your decision hinges on your property type, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Are you prioritizing ease of use and rapid deployment, or seeking a feature-rich platform with extensive integrations?
eviivo Suite™ is celebrated for its user-friendly interface, simple onboarding, and robust online booking integrations, especially favored by independent hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals. RMS, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive suite of tools tailored to larger, scalable properties like resorts, RV parks, and multi-property groups.
While eviivo’s emphasis is on ease and quick setup, RMS provides advanced features like trust accounting, a detailed report writer, and extensive automation options. The main divergence is in complexity: RMS caters to hotels with complex needs and growth plans, whereas eviivo appeals to smaller properties valuing simplicity.
If your hotel needs quick deployment, straightforward management, and strong OTA integrations, eviivo is likely the better fit. But if your hotel requires detailed financial tracking, complex reporting, or scaling across multiple locations, RMS should be your choice.
If your hotel mainly operates as an independent property, B&B, or vacation rental, and values quick, painless setup, go with eviivo. It’s particularly suited for small to medium-sized businesses aiming for online visibility and easy management, as evidenced by its high reviewer satisfaction and simplicity.
Conversely, if your property is part of a larger portfolio, or you’re planning expansion, RMS’s extensive features like trust accounting, a guest portal, and customizable reporting make it more suitable. RMS’s ability to support complex, multi-property operations is a decisive advantage for hotels seeking to scale efficiently.
eviivo’s UI is rated 4.43/5, praised for its intuitive design and quick onboarding, with reviewers noting that staff adoption is straightforward. Its mobile app, though not perfect, offers convenient on-the-go management, with many users emphasizing its simplicity.
RMS has a slightly lower ease-of-use score at 4.28/5 but is still regarded as user-friendly, especially for teams familiar with hotel operations. Support staff are generally responsive, though some users mention that its extensive feature set can require a learning curve.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ PMS.
eviivo offers 50 shared features plus one exclusive feature—the drag-and-drop tape chart—streamlining reservation management visually. RMS boasts 24 exclusive features, including guest CRM, multi-lingual support, channel management, POS, and advanced guest feedback tools, making it suitable for larger, more complex properties.
While eviivo excels in simple reservation workflows and OTA integrations, RMS provides in-depth operational tools like rules-based room assignments and spa/wellness modules. For feature depth, RMS has a clear edge.
Edge: RMS.
eviivo’s support is highly rated at 4.42/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and onboarding assistance. Many mention that staff like Joseph and Xavier go above and beyond, making initial setup smooth.
RMS’s support is slightly better rated at 4.48/5, with users appreciating the proactive and knowledgeable team. While some mention that technical help can be delayed due to support staff being spread across regions, overall, RMS’s support is seen as reliable.
Edge: RMS.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs and booking engines. RMS connects with 112 verified partners, offering extensive compatibility with OTAs, trust accounting, POS, and more.
Shared integrations include TripAdvisor, Canary Technologies, and PriceLabs, but RMS’s broader partner network gives it a significant advantage for properties needing diverse, scalable integrations.
Edge: RMS.
eviivo’s 191 reviews with recent activity (20 in last 6 months) show a high recommendation rate of 95%, especially among independent properties and B&Bs. Its average overall rating is 0.93/5, but this seems inconsistent with its high trust and ease-of-use ratings; it may be a data anomaly.
RMS, with 293 reviews and similar recent activity, boasts a higher overall rating at 4.56/5, with many users from hotel chains and resorts praising its scalability and feature set. RMS’s reputation for supporting larger operations is reflected in higher ratings from complex property managers.
Edge: RMS.
eviivo charges a base price of $700 per month, with no additional setup or usage fees, making it transparent for small operations. RMS’s base fee is slightly higher at $800 per month, also free of implementation charges.
Both platforms lack trial periods or tiered pricing, so costs are straightforward but may be a consideration for budget-conscious properties.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
RMS offers a more comprehensive, feature-packed system suited for large, multi-property operations. Its extensive integrations and scalable tools make it the better choice if growth and complexity are priorities.
eviivo’s strength lies in its ease of use, quick setup, and OTA-focused features, making it ideal for small, independent hotels and vacation rentals that want to get online fast and manage reservations efficiently. If your hotel values simplicity, rapid deployment, and online visibility, eviivo is the way to go.
For properties aiming for long-term growth, detailed financial management, and advanced automation, RMS is the stronger choice. But if your focus is on straightforward management and quick results, eviivo’s intuitive platform is the better fit.
我们分析了 11 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功... RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功能的效用。
RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务... RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务等。这种全面性使酒店能够有效地简化各种运营流程。
用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能... 用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能显著降低了操作复杂性,使物业经理能够专注于其他关键任务。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
预订系统评价褒贬不一,用户呼吁提升其功能完善度和移动端友好性。建议包括简化预订流程,并考虑为回头客提供免费预订服务,以增强客户忠诚度并促进重复消费。
尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而... 尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而无需从头开始重新构建报表。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 RMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RMS 提供 112 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 87,RMS 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问