项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 325 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Exely 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Confirmation emails and Referral Reporting.
GuestCentric 表现出色 在 客户服务 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的住宿设施 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Urgency messaging.
基于 HTR 上 325 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $200/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 254 | 71 |
在分析了 325 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 用户友好的界面和日常运营效率, 响应式客户支持和账户指导, 直接预订和收入增长,而 GuestCentric 用户则强调 客户服务, 预订引擎效率, 营销工具和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好的界面和日常运营效率
▾
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
+
响应式客户支持和账户指导
▾
|
+
预订引擎效率
▾
|
|
+
直接预订和收入增长
▾
|
+
营销工具和报告
▾
|
|
+
预订引擎转化率与客人预订体验
▾
|
+
用户培训和知识库
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订引擎、报告和网站设计的定制
▾
|
−
可定制性
▾
|
|
−
报告和分析深度
▾
|
−
库存和费率管理
▾
|
|
−
促销灵活性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 34 条评价 | #12 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 64 条评价 | #16 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #22 5 条评价 | #28 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 6 条评价 | #13 3 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 35 条评价 | #12 37 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 28 条评价 | #14 21 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 17 条评价 | #17 12 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 9 条评价 | #6 15 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #24 2 条评价 | #11 13 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 11 条评价 | #10 53 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 79 条评价 | #29 0 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 17 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
Choosing a booking engine is critical for your hotel's direct revenue and guest experience. Both Exely Booking Engine and GuestCentric aim to streamline reservations, but they approach this goal differently. Exely is a newer platform with a focus on flexibility and integrations, while GuestCentric has a longer track record and a broader feature set. Which one best aligns with your hotel’s needs?
Exely offers a comprehensive suite of features in a streamlined, user-friendly package, with a focus on increasing direct bookings through marketing tools and channel management. GuestCentric emphasizes an intuitive guest experience, with a rich set of marketing and promotional features designed to maximize revenue. Their differing strengths highlight the importance of your hotel’s priorities — is it more about robust integrations or guest journey?
While Exely has a higher recent review count and a significantly higher overall rating (144 reviews and 0/5 overall, but 92+ HT Score), GuestCentric’s 62 reviews and 4.78/5 rating show sustained satisfaction, especially among independent and boutique hotels. Exely tends to cater more to properties seeking advanced customization and multi-channel connectivity; GuestCentric aims for ease of use with marketing automation. Do you prioritize sophisticated features or a simplified booking journey?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich booking engine capable of handling multi-room bookings, custom add-ons, GDPR compliance, and detailed conversion reports, Exely is the clear choice. Its lower price point ($200/month) combined with a strong feature set appeals to independent hotels and boutique properties looking for value.
If your hotel prioritizes an engaging, fast-to-implement platform with strong digital marketing tools, instant promotion updates, and a focus on maximizing direct revenue, GuestCentric is preferable. Its higher price ($600/month) reflects its broader integrations and marketing capabilities, making it ideal for hotels seeking to boost digital visibility and guest engagement.
For properties with complex booking requirements and tech-savvy teams, Exely offers advanced options. Conversely, if your hotel values sleek design and marketing automation above all, GuestCentric provides a compelling solution.
Exely scores a 4.91/5 for ease of use, with a straightforward interface praised for managing rates, availability, and reservations efficiently. Users report that onboarding is quick, often within days, and staff adoption is smooth, thanks to clear navigation and support.
GuestCentric also boasts a high ease-of-use rating (4.55/5) with positive reviews about its intuitive interface and minimal clicks needed for booking. However, some users mention that the mobile version requires improvements to match the desktop experience.
Edge: Exely. Its higher ease-of-use rating and more recent positive reviews suggest a better experience for staff onboarding and daily operations.
Exely offers 17 exclusive features like multi-room bookings, room substitutions, conversion reports, GDPR compliance, and integrations with TripAdvisor bookings and Facebook conversion tracking. GuestCentric provides 11 unique features, including pooled inventory, loyalty programs, gift vouchers, and social media booking, but lacks some of Exely's advanced booking and customization tools.
Exely’s extensive feature set is tailored for flexible, complex booking scenarios, while GuestCentric emphasizes marketing and promotional tools to boost conversions. If advanced booking customization is your priority, Exely leads.
Edge: Exely. Its higher feature count and specialized options give it an edge for hotels needing detailed control and integrations.
Exely’s support scores a 4.96/5, with reviewers praising prompt, friendly responses and ongoing assistance that resolves issues efficiently. Users highlight that Exely’s team is proactive and solution-oriented, making onboarding and troubleshooting straightforward.
GuestCentric also earns high marks (4.76/5), with reviews emphasizing quick responses and dedicated account management. Users say, “The team is amazing and always ready to help,” but some mention occasional delays in resolving complex issues.
Edge: Exely. Its slightly higher support score and recent reviews confirm a more responsive and reliable customer service experience.
GuestCentric’s 44 verified integrations far outpace Exely’s 8, including notable partners like Omnibees, Cendyn, and WebRezPro. Meanwhile, Exely’s integrations include Hotellab, Booking.com, Mews, and Oracle Hospitality, but fewer third-party systems overall.
If your hotel depends on extensive third-party integrations, especially with PMS or marketing tools, GuestCentric is the better choice. For straightforward connectivity needs, Exely’s integration count suffices.
Edge: GuestCentric. Its broader integration ecosystem enhances flexibility for larger or more complex hotel operations.
Exely’s reviews, though fewer in number, are highly recent and positive, with a 98% likelihood to recommend and an overall rating of 0/5 (likely a rating anomaly but high HT Score). Users praise its flexibility, prompt support, and direct booking improvements, especially among boutique and resort hotels.
GuestCentric consistently receives a 4.78/5 rating, with independent hoteliers particularly appreciating its ease of use and marketing features. Its reviews are recent and reflect satisfaction across segments like boutique and resort hotels.
Given the higher recent review count and HT Score, GuestCentric's reputation is more robust.
Edge: GuestCentric. Its higher overall and recent ratings demonstrate stronger, more consistent user satisfaction.
Exely charges a $200/month base fee with no additional implementation or trial costs, offering a straightforward pricing model. GuestCentric’s price is $600/month, reflecting its broader feature set and integrations, with no mention of setup fees or trials.
If budget is a concern, Exely provides a more affordable, predictable option. Larger hotels seeking extensive marketing and integration capabilities might consider GuestCentric’s higher investment justified.
Hotels that should consider Exely include:
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on social media promotions or needs a built-in loyalty program.
Hotels that would benefit from GuestCentric include:
Not ideal if your hotel has very complex booking scenarios requiring deep customization or if budget constraints are tight.
Exely offers a feature-rich, affordable booking engine ideal for independent, boutique, and small chains seeking control over operations and direct bookings. Its strengths lie in customization, integrations, and support, making it suitable for tech-savvy teams.
GuestCentric excels at delivering an easy-to-use, marketing-driven platform that increases direct bookings and enhances the guest experience, especially for boutique and resort hotels focused on digital visibility and automation.
If your hotel needs detailed control and affordability, choose Exely; for a strong marketing and guest journey platform, go with GuestCentric. Each has its place depending on your hotel’s specific priorities and budget.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $200/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
评论者一致认为Exely界面直观、易于教学,且在预订、房态、价格和客人信息等日常酒店运营中高效。其简洁性被视为节省时间的工具,减少了手动工作,帮助员工更有... 评论者一致认为Exely界面直观、易于教学,且在预订、房态、价格和客人信息等日常酒店运营中高效。其简洁性被视为节省时间的工具,减少了手动工作,帮助员工更有信心地管理销售,尽管仍有部分用户希望在高级功能区有更清晰的导航。
支持是Exely最一贯受到赞扬的优势之一,评论者强调通过聊天、电话、Telegram和电子邮件的快速响应。用户欣赏在设置、费率变更、技术问题和特别优惠配置方面的实... 支持是Exely最一贯受到赞扬的优势之一,评论者强调通过聊天、电话、Telegram和电子邮件的快速响应。用户欣赏在设置、费率变更、技术问题和特别优惠配置方面的实操帮助,常说团队减少了运营摩擦并增强了使用系统的信心。
评论者反复表示,Exely 有助于将需求转移到酒店网站,增加直接预订并降低OTA佣金成本。许多人指出收入的可衡量增长、转化率的提升以及通过预订引擎和促销工具对... 评论者反复表示,Exely 有助于将需求转移到酒店网站,增加直接预订并降低OTA佣金成本。许多人指出收入的可衡量增长、转化率的提升以及通过预订引擎和促销工具对直接销售策略的更好控制。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户经常要求在预订引擎和网站方面拥有更多的灵活性,包括品牌颜色、模板、小部件设计、确认邮件和发票格式。一些用户还希望拥有更可定制的报告和仪表盘,指出当... 用户经常要求在预订引擎和网站方面拥有更多的灵活性,包括品牌颜色、模板、小部件设计、确认邮件和发票格式。一些用户还希望拥有更可定制的报告和仪表盘,指出当酒店希望提供更具特色的品牌体验时,Exely可能会显得有限制。
一个主要的持续存在的差距是对更高级别的报告和分析的需求。审查者希望对转化、收入来源、销售渠道、入住率、活动表现和预订趋势有更深入的了解,常常要求定制化... 一个主要的持续存在的差距是对更高级别的报告和分析的需求。审查者希望对转化、收入来源、销售渠道、入住率、活动表现和预订趋势有更深入的了解,常常要求定制化的仪表盘、移动分析以及更便于跨时期比较。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
GuestCentric 的支持团队以快速而有用的响应而著称。酒店经营者强调员工的专业精神和奉献精神,他们随时准备协助解决问题并提供战略建议。
GuestCentric 的预订引擎因其速度快、可靠性高和用户友好界面而广受好评。用户注意到直接预订量显著增加,客人的导航也更加方便。该引擎还具有即时促销更新和可... GuestCentric 的预订引擎因其速度快、可靠性高和用户友好界面而广受好评。用户注意到直接预订量显著增加,客人的导航也更加方便。该引擎还具有即时促销更新和可定制选项,可满足酒店的需求。
GuestCentric 提供一系列营销工具,包括 SEO 和数字营销服务,有助于提高知名度和直接预订量。报告和分析工具也因提供绩效洞察而广受好评。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
该平台具有高度的可定制性,可根据酒店需求进行独特设置,例如附加服务、最低入住时间和灵活的促销优惠。这有助于酒店优化其产品并简化预订流程。
尽管 GuestCentric 的系统包含高级价格和库存管理功能,但一些用户发现更新价格和管理库存有点麻烦。建议包括更直观的界面和与现有系统更好地集成。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Booking Engine 和 GuestCentric (Booking Engine) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GuestCentric (Booking Engine) 提供 44 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Booking Engine:否。GuestCentric (Booking Engine):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 96,GuestCentric 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐