项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 301 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Exely 表现出色 在 ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.
Hotelchamp 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Urgency messaging.
基于 HTR 上 301 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $200/月 | 联系销售 |
| 经验证的评价 | 294 | 7 |
在分析了 301 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 支持响应速度和账户指导, 速度、稳定性与日常运营的便捷性, 预订引擎的易用性与客人转化,而 Hotelchamp 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持响应速度和账户指导
▾
|
|
|
+
速度、稳定性与日常运营的便捷性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎的易用性与客人转化
▾
|
|
|
+
直接预订与收入增长
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告与分析深度
▾
|
|
|
−
设计、品牌和定制限制
▾
|
|
|
−
集成与PMS连接
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 34 条评价 | #41 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 64 条评价 | #32 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #22 5 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 6 条评价 | #12 4 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 35 条评价 | #33 4 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 28 条评价 | #29 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 17 条评价 | #23 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 9 条评价 | #34 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #24 2 条评价 | #27 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 11 条评价 | #23 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 79 条评价 | #21 2 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 17 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Exely Booking Engine and Hotelchamp Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational priorities, and growth ambitions. Both aim to boost direct bookings and improve the guest experience, but they differ significantly in market presence, feature sets, and user feedback.
Exely, with a robust and recent review base, outperforms Hotelchamp in customer satisfaction and recent performance metrics. The question remains: which platform aligns best with your hotel’s current goals and future plans?
Exely’s strengths are rooted in its comprehensive feature set, high user ratings, and extensive global presence. It boasts a 92.7/100 overall score, with 144 reviews—63 from the last six months—indicating strong recent satisfaction and ongoing product development.
Hotelchamp, on the other hand, has a smaller review footprint—only 3 reviews—making its data less current and less representative of typical user experiences. Despite a slightly higher ease of use score (5/5 vs. 4.91/5 for Exely), it lacks the depth of recent feedback and detailed ratings that bolster Exely’s credibility.
While both products aim to simplify the booking process, Exely emphasizes direct booking growth through tailored marketing tools and channel management. Hotelchamp focuses on creating a visually appealing, app-like booking experience designed to maximize conversions, but its limited recent reviews make it harder to gauge ongoing performance.
In essence, Exely offers a more proven, data-backed solution for hotels seeking a reliable, feature-rich booking engine. Hotelchamp might appeal if your primary focus is a sleek interface, but the lack of recent reviews diminishes confidence in its current capabilities.
Edge: Exely.
If your hotel needs to increase direct bookings with a proven, reliable platform, go with Exely. Its extensive feature set (including post-stay and pre-stay emails, payment options like PayPal and PayU) and a large user base across diverse regions make it suitable for independent hotels, luxury properties, and resorts aiming for revenue growth.
If your priority is offering a guest-centric, visually stunning booking journey with minimal redirects, Hotelchamp may be appealing. However, with only three reviews and a lack of recent feedback, its ability to deliver consistent results is less certain. Hotelchamp is better suited for properties that prioritize user interface aesthetics and are comfortable with less proven data.
For hotels seeking a platform with a track record of support, integrations, and ongoing updates, Exely remains the stronger choice. Conversely, if your hotel is experimenting with a new design-focused approach and can tolerate less proven performance, Hotelchamp could be considered.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s user interface is rated 4.91/5 based on user feedback, praised for its management dashboard and smooth handling of rates, availability, and reservations. Its onboarding experience scores 4.84/5, with users highlighting prompt support and clear explanations.
Hotelchamp scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with customers describing its platform as intuitive, clean, and highly customizable. Support responsiveness is also rated at 5/5, with users appreciating quick assistance and helpful guidance.
While both are straightforward, Exely’s slightly lower ease-of-use rating reflects its broader feature complexity, which may require more initial learning. Hotelchamp’s simpler, app-like interface makes onboarding quicker and staff adoption easier.
Edge: Hotelchamp.
Exely offers 29 features, including room substitutions, post-stay emails, PayPal, and PayU, giving it a robust toolset. Notably, it supports marketing-specific features like upselling, promotions, and automatic guest re-engagement, which directly impact revenue.
Hotelchamp has 24 shared features with Exely but adds 10 unique tools: urgency messaging, price comparison widget, customizable exit modals, ADA compliance, and integrations with loyalty programs and Google Analytics. These features aim to enhance guest trust and personalization.
Exely’s strength lies in its marketing automation and direct booking tools tailored for hotel operations. Hotelchamp excels in creating an engaging, app-like booking flow designed to increase conversions and guest trust.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s support team scores 4.96/5, with reviews emphasizing prompt, friendly, and helpful responses. Customers appreciate the proactive approach and detailed explanations that facilitate smoother onboarding and issue resolution.
Hotelchamp also garners a perfect 5/5 support rating, with reviewers noting its responsiveness, helpfulness, and willingness to customize solutions. Its smaller user base means more personalized attention, but less volume-driven feedback.
Given the larger review count and recent activity, Exely’s support appears more consistently reliable and well-regarded across diverse property types.
Edge: Exely.
Exely integrates with 8 verified partners, including major channel managers like Hotellab and IDeaS, with three shared partners such as Oracle Hospitality and Mews. This limits some connectivity options but ensures core systems are supported.
Hotelchamp offers 45 verified integrations, including popular channel managers, marketing tools, and booking platforms like WuBook and ReservHOTEL. Its broader integrations support more complex tech stacks and marketing channels.
While Hotelchamp’s extensive integrations provide flexibility, Exely’s core integrations cover most common hotel operations needs, especially for independent and boutique hotels.
Edge: Hotelchamp.
Exely’s recent reviews reflect a high satisfaction rate, with a Net Promoter Score (NPS) of 9.73/10 and 98% likelihood to recommend. Hotelier feedback highlights its ease of use, support quality, and direct booking success.
Hotelchamp’s limited recent reviews and a lower score of 9.33/10 suggest less recent user validation. The few reviewers mention its excellent support and intuitive interface but express a desire for more flexibility.
Considering the frequency and recency of reviews, Exely’s ratings are more representative of consistent performance.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s pricing is transparent at a $200 monthly flat rate, with no implementation fees or freemium options. Its straightforward model suits hotels seeking predictable costs.
Hotelchamp’s pricing is not publicly disclosed; it likely varies based on hotel size and customization needs, making direct comparison difficult. The absence of clear pricing details suggests it may be tailored and potentially more expensive.
For hotels prioritizing budget clarity and simplicity, Exely’s fixed rate provides peace of mind. Hotelchamp’s custom quotes might be better for larger properties or those with complex requirements.
Edge: Exely.
Not ideal if:
Exely is best suited for hotels that want an all-in-one solution to boost revenue and simplify operations.
Not ideal if:
Hotelchamp is better for properties prioritizing guest experience and aesthetic appeal over extensive feature sets.
Exely stands out as a mature, well-reviewed platform with a broad feature set, extensive support, and proven results. Its global presence and recent feedback demonstrate ongoing development and reliability, especially for independent hotels and resorts focused on revenue growth.
Hotelchamp offers a compelling, visually attractive booking experience, ideal for properties prioritizing guest trust and ease of use. However, its limited recent reviews and narrower feature set make it less suitable for hotels seeking proven, comprehensive solutions.
If your hotel prioritizes a feature-rich, supported, and recent solution for direct booking growth, Exely is your best choice. If aesthetic appeal and a smooth guest journey are paramount, and you’re comfortable with less proven data, consider Hotelchamp.
Edge: Exely.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $200/月 | — |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评价赞扬Exely的支持团队、客户成功团队和账户经理,因其快速回复、清晰指导以及在设置和日常运营中的主动帮助。多家酒店表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间... 许多评价赞扬Exely的支持团队、客户成功团队和账户经理,因其快速回复、清晰指导以及在设置和日常运营中的主动帮助。多家酒店表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,加快了部署速度,并使平台更易于采用和操作。
用户经常提到,Exely通过集中管理预订、价格、房态和客人信息,简化了日常酒店工作。他们也很看重平台的速度和稳定性,尽管少数评论提到在高峰期加载缓慢或偶尔... 用户经常提到,Exely通过集中管理预订、价格、房态和客人信息,简化了日常酒店工作。他们也很看重平台的速度和稳定性,尽管少数评论提到在高峰期加载缓慢或偶尔出现预订流程问题。
预订引擎一直被描述为易于客人使用、响应迅速、移动端友好,并且能有效将网站访客转化为预订。评测者将其简洁的流程、部件和灵活的预订选项与更高的转化率和更好... 预订引擎一直被描述为易于客人使用、响应迅速、移动端友好,并且能有效将网站访客转化为预订。评测者将其简洁的流程、部件和灵活的预订选项与更高的转化率和更好的客人预订体验联系在一起。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户反复提出的主要需求之一是更详细、可定制的报告和分析。用户希望深入了解预订趋势、转化率、收入来源、渠道表现、预订动态、入住率变化以及仪表盘的灵活性,... 用户反复提出的主要需求之一是更详细、可定制的报告和分析。用户希望深入了解预订趋势、转化率、收入来源、渠道表现、预订动态、入住率变化以及仪表盘的灵活性,以便做出更好的商务和定价决策。
许多评论者希望对预订引擎和网站的外观与体验拥有更多控制权,包括颜色、模板、部件、确认邮件、发票和报表布局。Exely 以简洁的设计受到好评,但买家应注意到对... 许多评论者希望对预订引擎和网站的外观与体验拥有更多控制权,包括颜色、模板、部件、确认邮件、发票和报表布局。Exely 以简洁的设计受到好评,但买家应注意到对更深层次品牌定制和更现代、独特网站风格的反复需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Booking Engine 和 Hotelchamp Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Booking Engine 提供 9 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hotelchamp Booking Engine 提供 44 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Hotelchamp Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Booking Engine:否。Hotelchamp Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 97,Hotelchamp 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐