项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 323 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Exely 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Post-stay emails.
IBS Software 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 323 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $200/月 | 联系销售 |
| 经验证的评价 | 323 | 0 |
在分析了 323 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 支持响应速度和账户指导, 预订引擎的易用性和客人转化流程, 直接预订与收入增长,而 IBS Software 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持响应速度和账户指导
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎的易用性和客人转化流程
▾
|
|
|
+
直接预订与收入增长
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理与OTA同步
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告与分析深度
▾
|
|
|
−
设计、品牌和定制限制
▾
|
|
|
−
与PMS、支付网关和第三方的集成与连接
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 34 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 64 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #22 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 6 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 35 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 28 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 17 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 9 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #24 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 11 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 79 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 17 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right booking engine for your hotel is critical to increasing direct bookings, improving guest experience, and streamlining operations. Both Exely Booking Engine and iStay by IBS Software aim to meet these needs but diverge significantly in their market presence, features, and review credibility. Given the more recent reviews and higher user engagement, Exely emerges as the more reliable option for hoteliers who prioritize proven performance and support.
While iStay is a comprehensive platform designed for large hotels and resorts, the lack of recent review data makes it difficult to assess its current effectiveness. How do these platforms truly stack up in features, ease of use, and support? Let's compare.
Exely Booking Engine is a dedicated, user-friendly system with a focus on driving direct bookings and simplifying online operations. Its recent reviews, totaling 144 with 63 in the last six months, underscore its active user base and ongoing improvements, especially in ease of use and customer support, rated 4.91/5 and 4.96/5 respectively.
In contrast, iStay by IBS Software has no current reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge recent user satisfaction or performance. Its broad scope across property management and distribution is appealing, but the lack of recent feedback raises concerns about its current reliability and support.
Both products aim to boost revenue and guest satisfaction, but Exely’s vibrant user community and high ratings suggest it is better suited for hotels seeking proven, immediate results. Are you ready to focus on a platform with a track record?
If your hotel needs a booking engine that emphasizes direct bookings, ease of integration, and responsive support, go with Exely. Its 92.7 score on the HotelTechReport (HTR) scale and over 140 reviews reflect strong, recent customer confidence.
If, however, your hotel or resort requires a unified platform managing multiple aspects of operations beyond bookings—like distribution, guest experience, and property management—iStay might appeal, but the absence of recent reviews makes this less certain. For most hoteliers, Exely’s proven track record and feature set make it the safer choice.
Exely’s UI is rated 4.91/5 by users, with reviews highlighting its straightforward dashboard, quick learning curve, and efficient management tools. Its onboarding process is also rated highly at 4.84/5, indicating most users find it easy to implement and adopt.
iStay’s ease of use cannot be assessed due to the lack of recent reviews or ratings. Its broad scope suggests complexity, but without user feedback, it’s impossible to determine if it is as accessible as Exely.
Edge: Exely.
Exely offers 29 unique features not found in iStay, including mobile optimization, multi-room bookings, multilingual support, conversion rate reports, flexible rate plans, and integrations with Google Hotel Ads, Tripadvisor, and more. These features directly support revenue growth and guest engagement.
iStay’s feature set is not publicly detailed, and no unique features are listed beyond its broad property management scope. The absence of detailed features limits confidence in its ability to deliver specific booking enhancements.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s support is rated 4.96/5, with reviews praising its quick responses, friendly communication, and proactive problem solving. Many users highlight how support staff help resolve issues swiftly, contributing to smoother operations.
iStay’s support ratings and reviews are unavailable, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Given the importance of reliable support in SaaS, Exely’s proven high ratings give it a clear advantage for ongoing assistance.
Edge: Exely.
Exely integrates with 8 verified partners, including major players like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Booking.com, and others. Its integrations support channel management, payment processing, and online visibility.
iStay only has 2 verified partners—Duetto and IBS Software—limiting its connectivity options. The broader integration ecosystem of Exely enables more seamless hotel operations and data flow.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s recent reviews (144 total, 63 in the last six months) reflect an overall satisfaction rating of 92.7/100, with 98% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across various segments, especially boutique and city center hotels, appreciate its ease of use and support.
No current reviews or ratings exist for iStay, so we cannot compare hotel satisfaction directly. The active, positive feedback for Exely underscores its current popularity and trustworthiness among hoteliers.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s pricing starts at $200 per month, with no implementation fees or trial options, making it straightforward and transparent. The absence of pricing data for iStay means hotel teams must contact IBS Software directly for quotes, which might vary based on customizations.
Exely’s clear pricing model is advantageous for budgeting and decision-making, whereas iStay’s opaque costs could be a hurdle.
Edge: Exely.
Not ideal if you require a comprehensive property management system beyond bookings, or if your hotel prefers a platform with extensive distribution and operational features outside booking.
Not ideal if your primary goal is a dedicated booking engine to boost direct reservations, or if recent user feedback is important for your decision.
Exely Booking Engine offers a proven, feature-rich platform with high user satisfaction, active ongoing development, and extensive integrations. Its recent review data and high ratings make it the safer choice for hotels seeking immediate results and reliable support.
iStay by IBS Software presents an all-in-one, cloud-native solution tailored for large properties and complex operations, but the lack of current reviews makes it a riskier investment for hoteliers prioritizing proven performance.
For most hotels focused on direct bookings, ease of use, and support, Exely is the clear winner. If you need a broad, unified system to manage multiple facets of your property, iStay might appeal—yet its current quality remains unverified through recent user feedback.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $200/月 | — |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持是Exely在评价中的最大差异之一,许多用户称赞其响应迅速、问题解决有效,以及在设置和日常运营中提供的主动指导。多位用户提到有专门的专家或成功团队协助... 支持是Exely在评价中的最大差异之一,许多用户称赞其响应迅速、问题解决有效,以及在设置和日常运营中提供的主动指导。多位用户提到有专门的专家或成功团队协助酒店优化设置、推出优惠并快速解决问题。
用户常常描述预订引擎直观、快速,客人在完成预订时几乎没有阻碍。他们还指出,清晰的房型/价格展示、流畅的流程以及步骤更少都能提升转化率,尤其是在通过酒店... 用户常常描述预订引擎直观、快速,客人在完成预订时几乎没有阻碍。他们还指出,清晰的房型/价格展示、流畅的流程以及步骤更少都能提升转化率,尤其是在通过酒店官网预订时。
评论者一致认为,Exely 有助于将需求从OTA转向酒店官网,增加直接预订和收入。用户称赞预订引擎、增销工具、促销活动和以转化为导向的设计,帮助酒店销售更多并... 评论者一致认为,Exely 有助于将需求从OTA转向酒店官网,增加直接预订和收入。用户称赞预订引擎、增销工具、促销活动和以转化为导向的设计,帮助酒店销售更多并降低佣金依赖。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户经常提出希望获得更详细、灵活且可定制的报告,涵盖预订、收入、渠道表现和趋势。评审者常说,当前的报告在日常使用中很有用,但在战略分析或快速决策方面还... 用户经常提出希望获得更详细、灵活且可定制的报告,涵盖预订、收入、渠道表现和趋势。评审者常说,当前的报告在日常使用中很有用,但在战略分析或快速决策方面还不够深入,尤其是在移动应用或仪表盘中。
评审者喜欢简洁的界面,但常希望在品牌、部件颜色、确认邮件、网站模板和布局方面拥有更多控制权。部分评论指出,除非增加更多设计灵活性,否则预订引擎和网站可... 评审者喜欢简洁的界面,但常希望在品牌、部件颜色、确认邮件、网站模板和布局方面拥有更多控制权。部分评论指出,除非增加更多设计灵活性,否则预订引擎和网站可能显得过于标准化,尤其是对于希望强化品牌形象的酒店。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Booking Engine 和 iStay Booking Engine (by IBS Software) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Booking Engine 提供 10 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 iStay Booking Engine (by IBS Software) 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Booking Engine:否。iStay Booking Engine (by IBS Software):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 97,IBS Software 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐