The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 201 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 支持与培训, direct booking enhancement, 用户友好界面,而 STAAH 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持与培训
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct Booking Enhancement
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
移动优化
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
Seamless Integration
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 34 条评价 | #35 4 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 64 条评价 | #36 5 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #22 5 条评价 | #37 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 35 条评价 | #36 8 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 28 条评价 | #33 9 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 17 条评价 | #34 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 9 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #24 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 11 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 79 条评价 | #14 11 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 17 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's revenue and guest experience. Both Exely Booking Engine and STAAH Booking Engine address core challenges like direct booking growth and OTA dependence but diverge in reviews, features, and regional presence. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your operational needs and strategic goals.
Exely offers a robust platform with a strong review base and recent user feedback, while STAAH provides a highly rated, feature-rich alternative with a broader partner network. Which solution will truly elevate your hotel's booking performance?
Both Exely and STAAH aim to maximize direct bookings and reduce reliance on OTAs. Exely's platform emphasizes marketing tools that reconnect with guests after abandonment, boosting conversions, while STAAH focuses on ease of inventory management with a suite of ancillary add-ons. Exely's recent reviews show a consistent high rating, with 63 reviews in the last six months, indicating strong current user satisfaction. Conversely, STAAH's zero recent reviews suggest less recent customer feedback, making Exely the more data-backed choice today.
Exely's 92.67 score versus STAAH’s 0 reflects its proactive customer support and ease of use, but STAAH’s 4.81 out of 5 rating on overall satisfaction remains a compelling factor. If your hotel prioritizes recent user insights and demonstrated support, Exely holds the advantage. Are you ready to commit to a platform with more recent, robust feedback?
If your hotel needs a booking engine with a proven track record of recent reviews, robust support, and marketing tools to boost direct bookings, go with Exely. Its specialization in catering to independent hotels and chains alike, combined with a strong regional presence across multiple continents, makes it versatile and reliable.
If, however, your hotel requires a broad selection of integrations, extensive partner ecosystem, and a flexible, feature-rich solution that supports advanced rate management and add-ons, STAAH is a solid choice. Its focus on international markets and comprehensive partner list make it suitable for properties seeking seamless operational management.
For hotels prioritizing recent satisfaction and a higher review count, Exely is the clear winner. If your hotel values integrations and a wide partner network more, then STAAH could serve you better.
Exely's UI has garnered a 4.91/5 rating, with users highlighting its straightforward, user-friendly dashboard and quick onboarding process. Reviewers praise its simplicity in managing rates, availability, and reservations, which reduces staff training time. The platform’s recent reviews affirm that your team can adopt Exely quickly, with minimal friction.
STAAH’s interface is also rated favorably at 4.69/5, with support teams praised for their helpfulness and responsiveness. Users appreciate its intuitive navigation but suggest room for interface improvements. Overall, Exely’s higher ease-of-use score and recent positive feedback give it a slight edge in UX.
Edge: Exely.
Exely offers 21 shared features with STAAH and has 8 features exclusive to it, including booking abandonment recapture, GDPR compliance, Tripadvisor bookings, and referral reporting—features not found in STAAH. These unique tools enable more targeted marketing and better guest engagement.
STAAH boasts 4 exclusive features, such as a price comparison widget, pooled inventory, gift vouchers, and availability blocks, catering to dynamic pricing and promotional needs. While STAAH's features are extensive, Exely’s broader set of unique marketing and compliance tools give it the edge for hotels seeking advanced direct booking strategies.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s customer support scores 4.96/5, with reviewers appreciating prompt responses and friendly, solution-oriented assistance. Their recent reviews highlight the team’s dedication to resolving issues quickly, which enhances your team’s confidence and reduces operational downtime.
STAAH’s support scores slightly lower at 4.88/5, with multiple reviewers citing their helpful and professional service, though some mention UI improvements. Given the more recent, higher ratings and positive feedback, Exely’s support stands out as the more reliable option.
Edge: Exely.
STAAH offers 54 verified integrations across a broad partner network, including popular systems like Cendyn, GuestTraction, and HotelTime. Its extensive ecosystem supports complex operational needs and seamless third-party system connections.
Exely has 8 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality and Booking.com, and shares some common integrations with STAAH. However, the limited number of partners means fewer options for extensive system compatibility, giving STAAH a clear edge for hotels needing a wide array of integrations.
Edge: STAAH.
Exely’s 144 reviews with a 92.67 overall score reflect strong satisfaction, especially among boutique, city center, and resort hotels. Recent reviews emphasize its ease of use, support, and effectiveness in boosting direct bookings, making it a trusted choice for hotels seeking reliability and tangible results.
STAAH, with only 13 reviews and a 4.81/5 rating, is favored by resorts and boutique hotels in regions like North America and Asia Pacific. Its high ratings, despite fewer reviews, indicate strong customer approval, particularly for larger properties needing advanced features.
Overall, Exely’s larger, more recent review base and higher scores make it the preferred rating leader.
Exely charges a straightforward $200 monthly fee with no freemium or trial options available. Its transparent pricing makes budgeting predictable for your team but may limit flexibility for smaller properties.
STAAH does not publicly list pricing, which is common among larger, more customizable platforms. Its cost structure likely varies based on features and integrations, requiring direct inquiry for precise quotes.
Hotels that should consider Exely are:
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive integrations or a highly customizable interface, as Exely's features are more marketing and user experience-oriented.
STAAH is best suited for:
Not ideal if your hotel is small, requires simple setup, or prefers a platform with a shorter feature list and less emphasis on integrations.
Exely stands out as a booking engine with a solid recent review base, strong support, and a focus on direct booking marketing. Its suite of unique features and high ease-of-use make it ideal for independent and boutique hotels prioritizing simplicity and customer engagement.
STAAH offers a broad network of integrations, extensive partner options, and a feature-rich platform suitable for larger properties or those with complex operational needs. Its high ratings and diverse add-ons make it a compelling choice when flexibility and system compatibility are top priorities.
If your hotel values recent, positive feedback, ease of use, and marketing tools, Exely is the better choice today. For hotels needing extensive integrations and advanced management features, STAAH is the more suitable option.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely 的支持团队因其响应迅速、提供详尽的帮助和清晰的解决方案而广受好评。然而,新用户提到需要培训资料来更好地使用高级功能。
Exely substantially increases direct bookings, aiding hotels like Jimbaran Bay Beach Resort, and reducing OTA dependencies. Hotels report significant... Exely substantially increases direct bookings, aiding hotels like Jimbaran Bay Beach Resort, and reducing OTA dependencies. Hotels report significant sales growth, citing simplified operations, increased guest control, and promotional features.
该平台直观且条理清晰的界面被认为是其主要优势,提升了导航体验和用户体验。一些评论建议增加更现代化、可定制化的界面,以增强用户参与度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users often call for advanced reporting and detailed analytics, seeking comprehensive insights for better performance tracking. While some find existi... Users often call for advanced reporting and detailed analytics, seeking comprehensive insights for better performance tracking. While some find existing features satisfactory, many desire deeper filtering and customization options.
用户评论普遍反映,预订小部件和网站设计需要更多自定义选项。用户反映设计灵活性不足,这可能会影响品牌独特性和对顾客的吸引力。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Booking Engine 和 STAAH Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAAH Booking Engine 提供 54 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Booking Engine:否。STAAH Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 93,STAAH 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案