项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 320 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 支持响应速度和账户指导, 速度、稳定性与日常运营的便捷性, 预订引擎的易用性与客人转化,而 VISIT 用户则强调 支持与开发, 宾客体验与转化, 与其他系统集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持响应速度和账户指导
▾
|
+
支持与开发
▾
|
|
+
速度、稳定性与日常运营的便捷性
▾
|
+
宾客体验与转化
▾
|
|
+
预订引擎的易用性与客人转化
▾
|
+
与其他系统集成
▾
|
|
+
直接预订与收入增长
▾
|
+
灵活包装和追加销售
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告与分析深度
▾
|
−
定价和收益管理
▾
|
|
−
设计、品牌和定制限制
▾
|
−
后台管理
▾
|
|
−
集成与PMS连接
▾
|
−
多物业管理
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 34 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 64 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #22 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 6 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 35 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 28 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 17 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 9 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #24 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 11 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 79 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 17 条评价 | — |
You’re now evaluating two leading booking engines: Exely Booking Engine by Exely and VISIT by VISIT. Both aim to boost your hotel’s direct bookings, streamline operations, and improve guest experiences. While they share core functionalities, they diverge in features, integrations, pricing, and target hotel segments. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s unique needs and growth plans?
Both Exely and VISIT address the challenge of increasing direct bookings and reducing reliance on OTAs. Exely emphasizes seamless website integration with a focus on branding, while VISIT offers extensive package customization and a broader set of management tools. Do you prioritize brand consistency and ease of website embedding, or do you need advanced packaging and channel management features?
Exely’s embedded booking flow keeps users on your site, reducing drop-offs, whereas VISIT’s flexible package creation and upselling tools aim to maximize revenue per guest. Are your guests more likely to convert through a branded experience or through customizable offers?
With more recent reviews and a higher overall rating, Exely’s platform demonstrates stronger recent performance and user satisfaction. VISIT’s larger review base and broader feature set show its established presence, but the latest feedback favors Exely’s refined user experience. Which factor is more critical—current customer sentiment or feature breadth?
If your hotel is a boutique property or a resort focusing on direct bookings with a sleek website experience, Exely’s embedded engine and branding flexibility make it the better choice. Its lower price point ($200/month) and strong recent reviews suggest easier adoption and satisfaction.
Conversely, if your hotel needs extensive package options, complex channel management, or online gift and conference sales, VISIT’s superior feature count and broader integrations (19 verified partners) are advantageous. Its higher price ($800/month) reflects its more comprehensive management toolkit suited for larger or multi-property hotels.
In summary, choose Exely if you want a straightforward, visually integrated booking experience. Opt for VISIT if your operations demand advanced customization, channel control, and diverse package offerings.
Exely’s UI scores a near-perfect 4.9/5, with reviews praising its intuitive layout and fast onboarding. Many users say the system is straightforward, with minimal technical effort required, though some suggest a more modern look could enhance engagement.
VISIT also scores high at 4.89/5, with reviews highlighting its user-friendly back office and easy navigation of rate and package adjustments. However, some users mention that multi-property management can be less smooth and that mobile usability needs improvement.
Edge: Exely
Exely offers 3 features unique to its platform, such as PayU, Stripe, and customizable exit intent modals. Its total of 27 shared features with VISIT covers essential booking engine functions like availability, multi-language support, and real-time reservations.
VISIT stands out with 13 exclusive features, including wedding & corporate modules, urgency messaging, social media bookings, loyalty integration, Google Pay, and conversion rate reports. It also offers features like flexible dates and room substitutions not found in Exely.
Edge: VISIT
Both products enjoy strong support ratings, with Exely at 4.95/5 and VISIT at 4.93/5, based on recent reviews. Exely users praise the responsiveness, quick issue resolution, and friendly communication, though some mention a need for more comprehensive training materials.
VISIT’s support is similarly acclaimed for its ongoing assistance, with users emphasizing the long-term partnership approach. Reviewers note that support is consistently prompt, but some suggest more detailed guides and faster responses could improve experience.
Edge: Exely
VISIT offers 19 verified partners, including major OTAs, GDS, and global platforms like Cendyn, SiteMinder, and RateGain, providing extensive connectivity options. Exely’s 8 verified partners include key players like Oracle Hospitality and Booking.com, but it has fewer overall integrations.
Shared integrations include Oracle Hospitality and Mews, but VISIT’s broader ecosystem supports more diverse operational needs, especially for large hotel groups. If extensive channel management and third-party platform integration are your priority, VISIT’s offer is more comprehensive.
Edge: VISIT
Exely’s recent reviews and 73 feedback instances within the past six months show consistently high satisfaction, especially among boutique, resort, and city center hotels. The platform’s ease of use and direct booking growth are frequently praised.
VISIT, with 27 reviews, scores equally high but mostly from larger resorts and branded hotels. Its features are appreciated, but some recent reviews point to needing better mobile usability and simpler multi-property management.
Considering recent data, Exely’s higher review volume and recency give it a slight edge in current hoteliers’ ratings.
Edge: Exely
Exely’s pricing starts at $200/month with no implementation fee, offering a straightforward monthly flat rate. VISIT costs $800/month, reflecting its broader feature set and integrations, with no mention of setup costs.
If your budget is limited or you prefer predictable expenses, Exely provides a more affordable entry point. For larger operations needing extensive customization and integration, VISIT’s higher price aligns with its capabilities.
Not ideal if you need complex package customization, extensive channel management, or online gift sales.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, branded booking flow or operates on a very tight budget.
Exely’s core advantage is its focus on direct bookings through a branded, embedded booking engine. It’s ideal for boutique hotels or resorts that want a straightforward, cost-effective solution with recent high satisfaction ratings.
VISIT excels in offering extensive features like flexible packaging, channel management, and integrations, making it suitable for larger hotels or those with complex sales needs. Its higher price reflects its broader scope, which can be overkill for smaller properties.
If your priority is a sleek, easy-to-use booking engine focused on direct growth, go with Exely. If your operations demand advanced customization, multi-channel control, and detailed analytics, VISIT is the better choice.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评价赞扬Exely的支持团队、客户成功团队和账户经理,因其快速回复、清晰指导以及在设置和日常运营中的主动帮助。多家酒店表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间... 许多评价赞扬Exely的支持团队、客户成功团队和账户经理,因其快速回复、清晰指导以及在设置和日常运营中的主动帮助。多家酒店表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,加快了部署速度,并使平台更易于采用和操作。
用户经常提到,Exely通过集中管理预订、价格、房态和客人信息,简化了日常酒店工作。他们也很看重平台的速度和稳定性,尽管少数评论提到在高峰期加载缓慢或偶尔... 用户经常提到,Exely通过集中管理预订、价格、房态和客人信息,简化了日常酒店工作。他们也很看重平台的速度和稳定性,尽管少数评论提到在高峰期加载缓慢或偶尔出现预订流程问题。
预订引擎一直被描述为易于客人使用、响应迅速、移动端友好,并且能有效将网站访客转化为预订。评测者将其简洁的流程、部件和灵活的预订选项与更高的转化率和更好... 预订引擎一直被描述为易于客人使用、响应迅速、移动端友好,并且能有效将网站访客转化为预订。评测者将其简洁的流程、部件和灵活的预订选项与更高的转化率和更好的客人预订体验联系在一起。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户反复提出的主要需求之一是更详细、可定制的报告和分析。用户希望深入了解预订趋势、转化率、收入来源、渠道表现、预订动态、入住率变化以及仪表盘的灵活性,... 用户反复提出的主要需求之一是更详细、可定制的报告和分析。用户希望深入了解预订趋势、转化率、收入来源、渠道表现、预订动态、入住率变化以及仪表盘的灵活性,以便做出更好的商务和定价决策。
许多评论者希望对预订引擎和网站的外观与体验拥有更多控制权,包括颜色、模板、部件、确认邮件、发票和报表布局。Exely 以简洁的设计受到好评,但买家应注意到对... 许多评论者希望对预订引擎和网站的外观与体验拥有更多控制权,包括颜色、模板、部件、确认邮件、发票和报表布局。Exely 以简洁的设计受到好评,但买家应注意到对更深层次品牌定制和更现代、独特网站风格的反复需求。
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
BookVisit 的支持团队经常因响应迅速和乐于助人而受到称赞。用户对持续的开发和更新表示赞赏,但有些人认为,响应速度更快和指南更完善还有待改进。
该平台的易用性显著提升了客人体验,从而提高了转化率。其用户友好的界面受到客人和管理员的一致好评。不过,有些人认为移动界面和票务管理还有改进空间。
与 PMS 系统和各种 OTA 渠道的集成备受推崇,可简化操作。关键是,一些用户希望更好地与特定系统集成,例如餐桌预订和 SPA 管理。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
BookVisit 提供了良好的统计和收入管理工具,但用户建议实施更多动态定价功能以简化房间类型和入住率管理。
用户对后台预订管理和分析功能表示赞赏,认为这些功能有助于日常运营。但是,他们呼吁改进价格管理系统,并简化复杂预订变更的导航。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Booking Engine 和 VISIT Booking Engine (BookVisit) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Booking Engine 提供 9 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 VISIT Booking Engine (BookVisit) 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Booking Engine:否。VISIT Booking Engine (BookVisit):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 97,VISIT 的为 24。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐