The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 220 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 支持与培训, direct booking enhancement, 用户友好界面,而 VISIT 用户则强调 支持与开发, 宾客体验与转化, 与其他系统集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持与培训
▾
|
+
支持与开发
▾
|
|
+
Direct Booking Enhancement
▾
|
+
宾客体验与转化
▾
|
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
与其他系统集成
▾
|
|
+
移动优化
▾
|
+
灵活包装和追加销售
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
−
定价和收益管理
▾
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
−
后台管理
▾
|
|
−
Seamless Integration
▾
|
−
多物业管理
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 34 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 64 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #22 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 35 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 28 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 17 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 9 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #24 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 11 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 79 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 17 条评价 | — |
You’re now evaluating two leading booking engines: Exely Booking Engine by Exely and VISIT by VISIT. Both aim to boost your hotel’s direct bookings, streamline operations, and improve guest experiences. While they share core functionalities, they diverge in features, integrations, pricing, and target hotel segments. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s unique needs and growth plans?
Both Exely and VISIT address the challenge of increasing direct bookings and reducing reliance on OTAs. Exely emphasizes seamless website integration with a focus on branding, while VISIT offers extensive package customization and a broader set of management tools. Do you prioritize brand consistency and ease of website embedding, or do you need advanced packaging and channel management features?
Exely’s embedded booking flow keeps users on your site, reducing drop-offs, whereas VISIT’s flexible package creation and upselling tools aim to maximize revenue per guest. Are your guests more likely to convert through a branded experience or through customizable offers?
With more recent reviews and a higher overall rating, Exely’s platform demonstrates stronger recent performance and user satisfaction. VISIT’s larger review base and broader feature set show its established presence, but the latest feedback favors Exely’s refined user experience. Which factor is more critical—current customer sentiment or feature breadth?
If your hotel is a boutique property or a resort focusing on direct bookings with a sleek website experience, Exely’s embedded engine and branding flexibility make it the better choice. Its lower price point ($200/month) and strong recent reviews suggest easier adoption and satisfaction.
Conversely, if your hotel needs extensive package options, complex channel management, or online gift and conference sales, VISIT’s superior feature count and broader integrations (19 verified partners) are advantageous. Its higher price ($800/month) reflects its more comprehensive management toolkit suited for larger or multi-property hotels.
In summary, choose Exely if you want a straightforward, visually integrated booking experience. Opt for VISIT if your operations demand advanced customization, channel control, and diverse package offerings.
Exely’s UI scores a near-perfect 4.9/5, with reviews praising its intuitive layout and fast onboarding. Many users say the system is straightforward, with minimal technical effort required, though some suggest a more modern look could enhance engagement.
VISIT also scores high at 4.89/5, with reviews highlighting its user-friendly back office and easy navigation of rate and package adjustments. However, some users mention that multi-property management can be less smooth and that mobile usability needs improvement.
Edge: Exely
Exely offers 3 features unique to its platform, such as PayU, Stripe, and customizable exit intent modals. Its total of 27 shared features with VISIT covers essential booking engine functions like availability, multi-language support, and real-time reservations.
VISIT stands out with 13 exclusive features, including wedding & corporate modules, urgency messaging, social media bookings, loyalty integration, Google Pay, and conversion rate reports. It also offers features like flexible dates and room substitutions not found in Exely.
Edge: VISIT
Both products enjoy strong support ratings, with Exely at 4.95/5 and VISIT at 4.93/5, based on recent reviews. Exely users praise the responsiveness, quick issue resolution, and friendly communication, though some mention a need for more comprehensive training materials.
VISIT’s support is similarly acclaimed for its ongoing assistance, with users emphasizing the long-term partnership approach. Reviewers note that support is consistently prompt, but some suggest more detailed guides and faster responses could improve experience.
Edge: Exely
VISIT offers 19 verified partners, including major OTAs, GDS, and global platforms like Cendyn, SiteMinder, and RateGain, providing extensive connectivity options. Exely’s 8 verified partners include key players like Oracle Hospitality and Booking.com, but it has fewer overall integrations.
Shared integrations include Oracle Hospitality and Mews, but VISIT’s broader ecosystem supports more diverse operational needs, especially for large hotel groups. If extensive channel management and third-party platform integration are your priority, VISIT’s offer is more comprehensive.
Edge: VISIT
Exely’s recent reviews and 73 feedback instances within the past six months show consistently high satisfaction, especially among boutique, resort, and city center hotels. The platform’s ease of use and direct booking growth are frequently praised.
VISIT, with 27 reviews, scores equally high but mostly from larger resorts and branded hotels. Its features are appreciated, but some recent reviews point to needing better mobile usability and simpler multi-property management.
Considering recent data, Exely’s higher review volume and recency give it a slight edge in current hoteliers’ ratings.
Edge: Exely
Exely’s pricing starts at $200/month with no implementation fee, offering a straightforward monthly flat rate. VISIT costs $800/month, reflecting its broader feature set and integrations, with no mention of setup costs.
If your budget is limited or you prefer predictable expenses, Exely provides a more affordable entry point. For larger operations needing extensive customization and integration, VISIT’s higher price aligns with its capabilities.
Not ideal if you need complex package customization, extensive channel management, or online gift sales.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, branded booking flow or operates on a very tight budget.
Exely’s core advantage is its focus on direct bookings through a branded, embedded booking engine. It’s ideal for boutique hotels or resorts that want a straightforward, cost-effective solution with recent high satisfaction ratings.
VISIT excels in offering extensive features like flexible packaging, channel management, and integrations, making it suitable for larger hotels or those with complex sales needs. Its higher price reflects its broader scope, which can be overkill for smaller properties.
If your priority is a sleek, easy-to-use booking engine focused on direct growth, go with Exely. If your operations demand advanced customization, multi-channel control, and detailed analytics, VISIT is the better choice.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely 的支持团队因其响应迅速、提供详尽的帮助和清晰的解决方案而广受好评。然而,新用户提到需要培训资料来更好地使用高级功能。
Exely substantially increases direct bookings, aiding hotels like Jimbaran Bay Beach Resort, and reducing OTA dependencies. Hotels report significant... Exely substantially increases direct bookings, aiding hotels like Jimbaran Bay Beach Resort, and reducing OTA dependencies. Hotels report significant sales growth, citing simplified operations, increased guest control, and promotional features.
该平台直观且条理清晰的界面被认为是其主要优势,提升了导航体验和用户体验。一些评论建议增加更现代化、可定制化的界面,以增强用户参与度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users often call for advanced reporting and detailed analytics, seeking comprehensive insights for better performance tracking. While some find existi... Users often call for advanced reporting and detailed analytics, seeking comprehensive insights for better performance tracking. While some find existing features satisfactory, many desire deeper filtering and customization options.
用户评论普遍反映,预订小部件和网站设计需要更多自定义选项。用户反映设计灵活性不足,这可能会影响品牌独特性和对顾客的吸引力。
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
BookVisit 的支持团队经常因响应迅速和乐于助人而受到称赞。用户对持续的开发和更新表示赞赏,但有些人认为,响应速度更快和指南更完善还有待改进。
该平台的易用性显著提升了客人体验,从而提高了转化率。其用户友好的界面受到客人和管理员的一致好评。不过,有些人认为移动界面和票务管理还有改进空间。
与 PMS 系统和各种 OTA 渠道的集成备受推崇,可简化操作。关键是,一些用户希望更好地与特定系统集成,例如餐桌预订和 SPA 管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
BookVisit 提供了良好的统计和收入管理工具,但用户建议实施更多动态定价功能以简化房间类型和入住率管理。
用户对后台预订管理和分析功能表示赞赏,认为这些功能有助于日常运营。但是,他们呼吁改进价格管理系统,并简化复杂预订变更的导航。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Booking Engine 和 VISIT 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 VISIT 提供 19 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Booking Engine:否。VISIT:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 93,VISIT 的为 25。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案