The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 26 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 51 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #7 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 29 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #13 27 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 14 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 6 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Stay247 |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #18 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 10 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 67 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 13 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right channel management software is critical for your hotel's online distribution and operational efficiency. Both Exely Channel Manager and Stay247 aim to streamline your booking channels, but Exely's more established presence and extensive feature set make it the more comprehensive choice for hoteliers serious about growth. Do you want a proven, feature-rich platform or are you exploring options with limited current market presence?
Exely Channel Manager holds a commanding lead in reviews, recent performance, and regional presence, making it the superior option for most hotels. Stay247’s lack of reviews and recent activity means it cannot match Exely’s track record. If your hotel needs reliability backed by active user feedback, Exely is the clear winner.
Exely and Stay247 both serve hotel properties seeking to improve online distribution, but Exely offers a more mature platform with 102 reviews and recent feedback from 34 hotels within the last six months. Stay247, by contrast, has no reviews or recent data, making it difficult to assess its quality or user satisfaction.
Exely’s robust ratings across ease of use (4.95/5), customer support (4.95/5), and value for money (4.87/5) demonstrate its reliability, while Stay247’s lack of ratings leaves gaps in understanding its performance. Exely’s extensive feature set, including inventory management, multi-currency support, and analytics, further distinguishes it from Stay247, which offers a more limited scope.
Are you willing to trust a platform with no recent reviews or proven market presence? If not, then Exely clearly outperforms Stay247 on every front.
Edge: Exely
If your hotel needs a channel manager with proven reliability, extensive features, and recent user validation, go with Exely. Its 102 reviews and high NPS score of 9.8/5 reveal strong user satisfaction, especially among hotels seeking advanced tools like inventory management and multi-lingual support.
If, however, your hotel is at an experimental stage or exploring new vendors without pressing operational needs, Stay247 might seem appealing due to its lack of cost or comprehensive features—though current market data suggests it’s untested. For hotels prioritizing stable, well-supported solutions, Exely is the better choice.
Edge: Exely
Exely’s UI is rated at 4.95/5, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers highlight that staff adopt it quickly, citing their platform’s user-friendliness and the responsive support team.
Stay247’s usability and onboarding experience are unverified due to no available reviews, leaving uncertainty about how easily your team could adapt. Given Exely’s high scores and recent positive feedback, it stands out as the easier platform to implement and operate.
Edge: Exely
Exely offers 13 unique features, including channel self-mapping, derived rates, support for weekly/monthly rates, inventory management, bulk updates, 2-way real-time integrations, multi-lingual/multi-currency support, integrated payments, centralized role management, inventory grid, analytics dashboard, and booking performance reports.
Stay247 lacks any listed features, making it impossible to compare capabilities directly. Exely’s feature depth clearly gives your hotel more operational control and data-driven insights, making it the superior choice.
Edge: Exely
Exely’s support ratings are near perfect at 4.95/5, with users describing their support as responsive, helpful, and quick to resolve issues. They also praise the onboarding process, which scores 4.86/5, indicating a smooth transition for new users.
Stay247’s support and onboarding ratings are unavailable, leaving a significant gap in confidence. With proven support and onboarding excellence, Exely is the safer choice for hotels needing reliable assistance.
Edge: Exely
Exely integrates with 8 verified partners, including Hotellab, Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Booking.com, and others. These integrations cover a broad range of PMS, booking engines, and distribution platforms.
Stay247 currently has no verified integrations, which limits its ability to connect with other hotel systems and tools. For seamless operations and future growth, Exely’s integrations provide a clear advantage.
Edge: Exely
Exely’s user feedback, with 102 reviews and recent activity, indicates high satisfaction across segments, especially in boutique, city center, and resort hotels. Its scores in ease of use, support, and value are all above 4.85/5, reflecting strong approval.
Stay247’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to determine user sentiment or segment preferences. Therefore, based on current data, Exely is the more highly-rated platform by hoteliers.
Edge: Exely
Exely charges a straightforward $100 monthly flat fee, with no implementation or trial fees, making it transparent and predictable for your budget. Stay247’s pricing details are not publicly available, which could complicate budget planning.
Given Exely’s clear pricing and no hidden costs, it offers better value certainty compared to Stay247’s opaque or unavailable pricing structure.
Edge: Exely
Not ideal if your hotel:
Edge: Exely
Not ideal if your hotel:
Edge: Exely (by default, due to lack of data on Stay247)
Exely Channel Manager is a well-established platform with a proven track record, extensive features, and active user feedback. Its high ratings across ease of use, support, and value demonstrate its effectiveness for hotels aiming for operational efficiency and increased revenue.
If your hotel requires reliability, comprehensive capabilities, and recent validation from other users, Exely is the clear choice. Its broad integrations, transparent pricing, and positive reviews make it a safer investment.
Stay247, with no current reviews or market presence, does not offer enough confidence or insight into performance. Unless your hotel is experimenting with no immediate needs for advanced features or support, choosing Exely ensures a more stable, feature-rich experience.
Edge: Exely
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely的渠道管理功能因其实时同步而备受赞誉,有效减少了手动更新和超额预订的情况。用户认为它操作简便,能够帮助用户在一个平台上高效管理预订和渠道。
支持团队通常能够快速有效地解决问题,但需要提供更高级的培训材料和教程,以帮助新用户更轻松地过渡。
用户认为该界面直观易用,显著提升了工作效率。然而,部分用户建议进行现代化设计更新,并提供更多自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户反馈一致认为,虽然目前的分析和报告功能很有帮助,但要深入了解性能和趋势,还需要更深入的定制功能。
虽然 Exely 与各渠道集成良好,但用户表示需要扩展集成功能和更多自动化工具来进一步简化操作。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Channel Manager 和 Stay247 Channel Management 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Channel Manager 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stay247 Channel Management 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Channel Manager:否。Stay247 Channel Management:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 85,Stay247 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问