The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 121 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Exely 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
The Homelike 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 121 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 121 | 0 |
在分析了 121 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 渠道管理, 客户支持与培训, 用户界面,而 The Homelike 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
The Homelike |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持与培训
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
直接预订
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
分析与报告
▾
|
|
|
−
集成与自动化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
The Homelike |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 26 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 51 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #7 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
The Homelike |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 29 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #13 27 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 14 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 6 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
The Homelike |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #18 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 10 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 67 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 13 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Exely Channel Manager and The Homelike depends on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations but serve very different core functions — Exely focuses on optimizing your online distribution, while The Homelike caters to long-term furnished rentals. Your decision hinges on whether your priority is expansive OTA management or extended-stay property solutions.
Given the current market, Exely’s more extensive review base and recent positive feedback make it the more dependable choice for hotels seeking to improve online distribution and booking efficiency. Are you leaning toward managing multiple channels or providing long-term rentals?
Exely Channel Manager and The Homelike are designed to address different aspects of property management. Exely’s primary function is to help hotels and serviced apartments synchronize their rates and availability across multiple OTAs and booking platforms, reducing manual work and increasing revenue. It also offers features like inventory management, real-time synchronization, and analytics, which are valuable for hotels with complex distribution needs.
Conversely, The Homelike specializes in managing mid to long-term furnished apartment rentals. It simplifies listing, discovering, and booking extended stays, making it ideal for property owners and managers focused on long-term occupancy rather than short-term OTA distribution. It manages the rental process but does not offer channel management capabilities like rate synchronization or integrated booking management.
So, which tool better suits your hotel’s operational scope? If your goal is to optimize OTA presence and streamline online bookings, Exely is the logical choice. If your focus is on managing long-term furnished rentals, The Homelike provides a dedicated platform for that purpose.
If your hotel needs to manage multiple online booking channels efficiently, go with Exely. Its core strength is in real-time synchronization, multi-channel management, and revenue optimization for properties relying heavily on OTAs. Hotels that want to reduce manual updates, overbooking, and boost online visibility will find Exely’s features like inventory management, derived rates, and analytics indispensable.
However, if your hotel primarily offers long-term furnished apartments or extended stays, The Homelike is the better fit. Its platform is tailored for property owners and managers who want to list, market, and rent properties to tenants seeking month-long or longer stays. It’s more about tenant management and property promotion than OTA distribution.
In essence, choose Exely if your hotel’s revenue relies on OTA distribution and dynamic rate updates. Opt for The Homelike if your focus is extended-term rentals with an emphasis on property discovery and tenant relations.
Exely boasts a high usability rating of 4.95/5, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, smooth onboarding, and quick learning curve. Users describe it as "more efficient" and appreciate how it simplifies complex channel management tasks, reducing manual errors and saving time.
In contrast, The Homelike has no publicly available review ratings, but its platform is described as user-friendly for property owners and tenants, emphasizing ease of listing, browsing, and booking. However, because of the lack of detailed review data, we cannot compare usability directly.
Given the detailed positive feedback and high ratings, Edge: Exely.
Exely offers a suite of 13 unique features, including channel self-mapping, derived rates, weekly and monthly rate support, inventory management, bulk updates, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, integrated payments, and analytics dashboards. These features significantly enhance distribution control, operational efficiency, and revenue insights.
The Homelike does not appear to have any exclusive features listed or comparable tools to Exely’s comprehensive channel management suite. Its core focus is on property listings, discovery, and booking for extended stays, without specialized distribution or rate management features.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s support is highly rated at 4.95/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and ongoing platform updates. Users describe the support team as "responsive and professional," which contributes to smoother onboarding and ongoing use.
There is no publicly available support rating or review data for The Homelike, but user feedback indicates satisfaction with its customer service, especially around property listing and booking processes. Nonetheless, without specific ratings, Exely’s support reputation is stronger.
Edge: Exely.
Exely has verified integrations with 8 partners, including Hotellab, Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Booking.com, and others, enabling hotel operators to connect their PMS, booking engines, and distribution channels. These integrations facilitate automation and operational efficiency.
The Homelike shows no verified integrations, listing zero. Its platform is primarily designed as a property discovery and rental management tool, not integrated with other hotel systems or distribution channels.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s reviews are recent, with 102 total reviews, 34 in the last six months, and an overall rating of 0/5 but a high HTR score of 85.1. Key review highlights include its efficiency, ease of use, and positive impact on revenue, with 98% likelihood to recommend.
The Homelike has no publicly available rating or recent reviews, which makes it difficult to assess user satisfaction or compare ratings meaningfully. Based on available data, Exely’s review base and recent positive feedback make it the more favorably rated option.
Edge: Exely.
Exely charges a straightforward monthly fee of $100, with no implementation fee or trial period. Its pricing model is transparent, making it accessible for hotels of various sizes.
The Homelike’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed or available, which limits direct comparison. It’s likely that pricing varies depending on property size or usage, but without concrete figures, we cannot evaluate cost-effectiveness.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Exely’s core advantage lies in its emphasis on multi-channel distribution, real-time synchronization, and extensive feature set for revenue optimization. Its high review count and recent positive feedback make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking to improve their online presence and operational efficiency.
The Homelike, while suited for long-term rental management, offers no publicly available reviews or detailed feature comparisons, limiting its appeal for typical hotel operations that depend on OTA connectivity and dynamic rate management.
Choose Exely if your hotel depends on OTA distribution, needs detailed analytics, and values proven, well-supported technology. Opt for The Homelike if your primary focus is on long-term furnished rentals and tenant management, and you are prepared to seek alternative solutions for channel distribution.
Note: Based on current review data and feature offerings, Exely Channel Manager is the more proven and widely supported choice.
渠道经理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
The Homelike | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Exely Channel Manager 和 The Homelike 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
The Homelike |
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 批量更新和多重限制 | ||
| 支持每周和每月费率 | ||
| 派生费率 | ||
| 通道自映射 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 1 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely的渠道管理功能因其实时同步而备受赞誉,有效减少了手动更新和超额预订的情况。用户认为它操作简便,能够帮助用户在一个平台上高效管理预订和渠道。
支持团队通常能够快速有效地解决问题,但需要提供更高级的培训材料和教程,以帮助新用户更轻松地过渡。
用户认为该界面直观易用,显著提升了工作效率。然而,部分用户建议进行现代化设计更新,并提供更多自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户反馈一致认为,虽然目前的分析和报告功能很有帮助,但要深入了解性能和趋势,还需要更深入的定制功能。
虽然 Exely 与各渠道集成良好,但用户表示需要扩展集成功能和更多自动化工具来进一步简化操作。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Channel Manager 和 The Homelike 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Channel Manager 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 The Homelike 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Channel Manager:否。The Homelike:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 85,The Homelike 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问