项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 242 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Exely 在易用性与日常运营方面表现出色,尤其适合民宿住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有支持每周和每月费率以及多种语言等独家功能。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 78 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 90 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 51 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #6 9 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 79 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #9 52 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 39 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 9 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #14 3 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #15 19 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 183 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #5 32 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Exely Channel Manager and update247 Channel Manager hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, the size of your operation, and your regional presence. Both products aim to simplify online distribution, but Exely's more established reputation and comprehensive feature set distinguish it from update247. Your team should evaluate which platform aligns best with your operational complexity and growth ambitions.
Exely offers a more robust, well-reviewed option with a broader global footprint and advanced support. update247, while simpler, lacks recent reviews and regional reach. Are you ready to dive into a detailed comparison?
Both Exely and update247 are designed to streamline your online distribution, but they differ significantly in user feedback, regional presence, and functionality. Exely is praised for its real-time synchronization, ease of use, and extensive integration options, supported by a high 85.1 score on HotelTechReport and over 100 recent reviews. update247, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or user ratings, which limits confidence in its performance.
Exely’s reviews highlight consistent satisfaction with its reliability, customer support, and feature set, making it a trusted choice for hotel operators. update247’s lack of recent feedback makes it difficult for hoteliers to gauge its current capabilities or user experience. When choosing your channel manager, consider whether a proven, well-reviewed platform is worth a slight premium over an untested alternative.
If your hotel needs a channel manager with proven reliability, extensive integration options, and regional coverage, Exely is the better fit. Its features support a wide variety of hotel types, and it’s highly rated by users for operational efficiency and customer support. For independent hotels and larger chains, Exely's ability to connect with 8 verified partners and its global reach make it a strong contender.
If simplicity and minimal regional presence are your priorities, update247 might appeal. However, its lack of recent reviews and only three verified integrations suggest it may not meet the demands of growing or complex operations. For hotels seeking a trustworthy, feature-rich solution, Exely clearly leads.
Exely boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.95/5, supported by glowing reviews that emphasize its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and minimal learning curve. Users report that the platform simplifies daily operations, reduces manual tasks, and offers fast, responsive customer support.
In contrast, update247 has no available user ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience confidently. Given Exely’s proven ease of use and comprehensive support, it provides a safer choice for teams that prioritize quick adoption and minimal training.
Edge: Exely.
Exely offers 11 shared features with other channel managers but also includes two features exclusive to it: support for weekly and monthly rates, and multi-lingual capabilities. Its features support complex rate structures, global operations, and flexible reporting. These capabilities are designed to meet the needs of diverse property types, especially larger or international hotels.
update247 provides fewer verified features, with only three total, and one unique feature: PMS connectivity. Its limited feature set suggests a narrower focus, suitable perhaps for smaller hotels or those with less complex distribution needs.
Edge: Exely.
Exely’s customer support is rated at 4.95/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and professionalism. Users mention that support resolves issues quickly and helps maintain smooth operations, which is critical when managing multiple channels.
update247 has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine its support quality. The lack of feedback suggests that if support quality is a priority, Exely’s well-documented high rating provides more confidence.
Edge: Exely.
Exely connects with 8 verified partners, including key players like Booking.com, Oracle Hospitality, and Mews, plus several niche integrations. Its broad integration network allows your hotel to connect with many major OTAs, PMS systems, and revenue managers.
update247, with only 3 verified partners, has a more limited integration scope, including RMS, PriceLabs, and Stripe. If your property relies on extensive third-party systems, Exely’s broader ecosystem will serve you better.
Edge: Exely.
Exely has a strong review base with 102 total reviews, including 34 recent ones within the last six months. Its overall rating is high at 85.1, with a likelihood to recommend of 98%. Hoteliers from diverse segments, especially city center and resort hotels, praise its reliability, ease of use, and support.
update247’s absence of recent reviews and ratings makes it impossible to assess current user satisfaction. For hoteliers seeking proven performance, Exely’s high review count and recent feedback make it the obvious choice.
Edge: Exely.
Exely charges a straightforward $100 monthly fee, with no implementation or trial costs. Its pricing model is transparent and predictable, making it easier to budget.
update247 does not publicly list its pricing, which complicates comparison. The lack of transparent pricing, combined with no recent reviews, suggests Exely offers better clarity and value.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Exely stands out as a trusted, well-reviewed channel manager with extensive integrations, broad regional coverage, and dedicated support. Its high ratings and recent reviews demonstrate consistent performance, making it suitable for mid-sized and larger hotels seeking reliable online distribution.
update247, while potentially suitable for small, simple operations, lacks recent user feedback and regional presence. Its limited feature set and integrations point toward a niche use case rather than a scalable, global solution.
In conclusion, if you want a proven, feature-rich platform with strong support and global reach, Exely is the clear choice. For smaller hotels with minimal needs and a tight budget, update247 may suffice, but caution is advised due to the lack of recent performance data.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
费率管理
|
|
|
| 支持每周和每月费率 | ||
| 收益规则 | ||
| 派生费率 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
|
▾
房间类型映射
|
|
|
| 通道自映射 | ||
|
▾
自动化与同步
|
|
|
| 批量更新和多重限制 | ||
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
|
▾
管理和设置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
| 综合支付处理 | ||
|
▾
分析和报告
|
|
|
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 预订绩效和进度报告 |
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Before Exely, we could not get enough flexibility or functionality we needed. We couldn’t manage dynamic pricing or promotions properly, now the system provides us all the tools t..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
酒店反复描述Exely界面直观、操作简便、适合日常管理。系统被认为能减少手工工作、加快预订处理流程,并让员工更容易管理预订、价格和房态。
评测者常将Exely描述为一个强大的渠道管理平台,能够从一个界面控制多个OTA渠道。他们重视集中管理分销、随着时间增加更多渠道,以及减少单独登录每个OTA的复杂... 评测者常将Exely描述为一个强大的渠道管理平台,能够从一个界面控制多个OTA渠道。他们重视集中管理分销、随着时间增加更多渠道,以及减少单独登录每个OTA的复杂性。
支持是Exely最受赞赏的方面之一,评论者反复提到其响应迅速、帮助及时且积极主动。酒店重视团队在安装、故障排除、优化甚至商业建议方面的协助,这降低了运营阻... 支持是Exely最受赞赏的方面之一,评论者反复提到其响应迅速、帮助及时且积极主动。酒店重视团队在安装、故障排除、优化甚至商业建议方面的协助,这降低了运营阻力。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
反复的批评是,Exely 的报告与分析需要更详细、更灵活、响应更快。评审希望有更清晰的仪表盘、更好的收入/渠道对比、更多可定制的报告,以及更丰富的预订趋势洞... 反复的批评是,Exely 的报告与分析需要更详细、更灵活、响应更快。评审希望有更清晰的仪表盘、更好的收入/渠道对比、更多可定制的报告,以及更丰富的预订趋势洞察,以支持收入和市场决策。
虽然许多用户觉得Exely易于使用,但也有人指出导航、页面加载速度和界面清晰度有待改进。最常见的反馈是某些操作流程需要点击太多次、部分页面加载缓慢,以及高... 虽然许多用户觉得Exely易于使用,但也有人指出导航、页面加载速度和界面清晰度有待改进。最常见的反馈是某些操作流程需要点击太多次、部分页面加载缓慢,以及高级设置不够直观。
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Exely Channel Manager 和 update247 Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Channel Manager 提供 10 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 update247 Channel Manager 提供 3 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
Exely Channel Manager:否。update247 Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 92,update247 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐