The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 816 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Yanolja Cloud Solution 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (3.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.
Passepartout 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 816 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 816 | 0 |
在分析了 816 条经验证的评价后,Yanolja Cloud Solution 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面友好, 可靠性和效率提升, integration and real-time synchronization,而 Passepartout 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面友好
▾
|
|
|
+
可靠性和效率提升
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and real-time synchronization
▾
|
|
|
+
POS系统性能
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析功能增强
▾
|
|
|
−
高级功能请求
▾
|
|
|
−
移动应用性能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 492 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 174 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #10 14 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #37 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 264 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 416 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 131 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #5 41 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #16 45 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #26 16 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #1 635 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 15 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Yanolja Property Management System and Passepartout hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and strategic goals. Both products aim to streamline property management but differ significantly in their scope, presence, and features. Yanolja offers a robust, cloud-based solution with extensive integrations and a strong user base, while Passepartout appears to be less established, with limited review data and regional presence. What should guide your decision?
Yanolja’s PMS is designed for hotels seeking a comprehensive, cloud-based, all-in-one management platform that covers reservations, billing, and integrations with online channels. Passepartout, on the other hand, is less clearly defined in its scope, primarily serving property managers and landlords with a focus on property oversight, but lacks detailed functionality and regional data.
Yanolja benefits from a large and recent review base, with 662 reviews in the last six months, highlighting ongoing user engagement and support. Passepartout’s review count is zero, providing no recent user insights to gauge its current effectiveness.
Do you prioritize proven, actively supported technology with extensive third-party partnerships? Or are you open to a less documented, potentially niche solution?
If your hotel needs a cloud-based platform with comprehensive integration, real-time updates, and proven reliability across multiple regions, Yanolja is the clear choice. Its client base includes a variety of hotel types—luxury, resorts, hostels—and it boasts a 4.25/5 overall rating from over 600 reviews, emphasizing user satisfaction.
Conversely, if your focus is on property management for landlords or small portfolios, and regional presence is less critical, Passepartout could be considered. However, with no recent reviews or clearly documented features, the lack of data suggests it’s less suited for hotels requiring a scalable, supported solution.
In short, for hotel operations, Yanolja’s extensive track record makes it the more reliable option.
Yanolja’s user interface scores an impressive 4.77/5, with reviews praising its intuitive design, ease of onboarding, and quick staff adoption. Many users have highlighted how easily their teams learned to operate the platform, with some mentioning training videos and local support as key factors.
Passepartout offers no review data or user ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding process. The absence of recent feedback signals a lack of demonstrated user adoption or satisfaction.
Edge: Yanolja.
Yanolja’s PMS provides a unique on-premise deployment option, alongside core features like reservations, billing, housekeeping, and reporting. It also boasts a dedicated interface for online partner integration, and over 157 verified third-party integrations, including major booking engines, accounting, and revenue management tools.
Passepartout’s feature set remains largely unspecified, with no documented integrations or distinguishing functionalities. Its lack of detailed features and zero verified partners suggest it’s a basic or less mature system.
Edge: Yanolja.
Yanolja’s support ratings are exceptional, with a 4.79/5 score based on recent reviews. Customers consistently praise the dedicated support team, with comments like “They really make you comfortable with the software and help you perform better,” and highlight quick, polite responses.
Passepartout offers no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving its customer service reputation unverified. This lack of feedback indicates a potential risk in support quality.
Edge: Yanolja.
Yanolja’s PMS integrates with over 157 verified partners, including key industry players like Xero, QuickBooks, and RevControl. This extensive partner network enhances automation, reporting, and revenue management, making Yanolja highly adaptable to hotel needs.
Passepartout has no verified integrations listed or documented partners, suggesting limited or no connectivity with third-party systems. This severely restricts operational flexibility and scalability.
Edge: Yanolja.
Yanolja’s HotelTechReport score of 91.84 and a 4.25/5 overall rating reflect strong satisfaction among diverse hotel segments, including resorts, hostels, and boutique hotels. Recent reviews are all positive, emphasizing ease of use, support, and operational efficiency.
Passepartout provides no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user sentiment or satisfaction levels. Without data, it’s safer to rely on the proven, highly-rated solution.
Edge: Yanolja.
Yanolja’s PMS has a clear base price of $100/month, with no freemium or trial offerings mentioned. Pricing for Passepartout is not available, and its cost structure remains unclear, which can hinder budget planning.
With transparent pricing, Yanolja allows easier ROI calculations and budget alignment, whereas Passepartout’s undefined costs could pose challenges.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Yanolja’s PMS stands out with its extensive review-backed performance, integrations, and regional presence, making it a safe choice for hotels that want a proven, feature-rich management platform. Its strong ratings and recent reviews demonstrate ongoing user satisfaction and support, making it suitable for a wide range of property types.
Passepartout’s limited publicly available data and zero recent reviews suggest it’s a less reliable choice for hotels seeking proven technology. It may serve niche needs for landlords or small portfolios but lacks the scalability and support infrastructure needed by most hotels.
In conclusion, if you’re a hotelier looking for a dependable, highly-rated PMS that integrates well and supports your growth, Yanolja is the clear choice. Passepartout might appeal to very specific, small-scale property managers but is not recommended for most hotel operations.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Passepartout | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Yanolja Property Management System 和 Passepartout 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| 在前提 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了该系统的用户友好型设计,这使得新员工能够轻松上手,快速掌握使用方法。直观的界面简化了日常操作,尤其是在预订和计费流程方面。
Yanolja 因其可靠性而备受赞誉,用户称赞其系统稳健可靠,能够提升部门效率和准确性。该平台在简化前台和收益管理方面的支持尤其受到重视。
Users praise Yanolja for its seamless integration of PMS, Channel Manager, POS, and Booking Engine, enabling efficient operations through real-time up... Users praise Yanolja for its seamless integration of PMS, Channel Manager, POS, and Booking Engine, enabling efficient operations through real-time updates that prevent overbookings and ensure inventory accuracy. The integration notably simplifies reservation handling and outlet billing.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统在运行效率方面表现出色,但用户经常要求提供更高级的报告选项和可自定义的仪表板,以便更好地监控性能并支持决策过程。
用户期待某些高级功能,例如 WhatsApp 发票和更深入的 CRM 集成,能够进一步增强与客户的沟通和运营效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Yanolja Property Management System 和 Passepartout 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Yanolja Property Management System 提供 157 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Passepartout 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Yanolja Property Management System 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Yanolja Property Management System:否。Passepartout:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Yanolja Cloud Solution 的 HT Score 为 92,Passepartout 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问