The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 370 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Passepartout 表现出色 .
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
基于 HTR 上 370 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 370 |
在分析了 370 条经验证的评价后,Passepartout 用户最看重其 ,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Passepartout |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is a critical decision for your hotel, impacting daily operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Passepartout by Passepartout promises a comprehensive property management solution aimed at landlords and property managers, while Stayntouch by Stayntouch offers an intuitive cloud-based platform specifically designed for hotels. Both claim to streamline operations, but which one truly fits your hotel's needs? Let’s explore their strengths and weaknesses.
Passepartout is marketed as a full-spectrum property management system for landlords and property portfolios, focusing on property-centric features. It boasts AI-powered insights and extensive property management tools but has a glaring weakness—no publicly available reviews or recent user feedback, raising questions about its current usability and support.
In contrast, Stayntouch has a proven track record with over 317 recent reviews, rated at 4.56 out of 5, with a high likelihood to recommend (94%). Its platform is tailored for hotel operations, emphasizing ease of use, guest experience, and integration capabilities. With recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and robust support, it clearly maintains a strong market presence.
Are these differences enough to guide your decision? If your hotel needs a proven, well-reviewed platform with active support, Stayntouch is the stronger choice. But if your focus is on property management outside the hotel context, Passepartout might be worth further investigation.
If your hotel prioritizes user-friendly operation, rapid onboarding, and extensive integrations, Stayntouch should be your pick. Its platform is highly rated for ease of use (4.7/5), and it offers a broad suite of features including revenue management, online check-in, and guest messaging—set apart by its 188 verified integrations.
Passepartout, however, appears more suited for property managers or landlords managing extensive portfolios, especially given its AI features and lack of recent reviews. If your hotel operates in a competitive, guest-centric environment, Stayntouch’s proven hotel-specific features and recent positive feedback make it the clear choice.
To sum up: Choose Passepartout if you need a property management backbone for multiple property types outside the hotel industry. Opt for Stayntouch if you want a hotel-focused, scalable PMS with proven user satisfaction and rich third-party integrations.
Ease of use is a highlight for Stayntouch, with a 4.7/5 rating based on 26 recent reviews. Hoteliers praise its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and mobile support, making daily tasks straightforward even for new staff. Users frequently mention its friendly and efficient training process, boosting staff confidence quickly.
Passepartout’s user experience is unreviewed, but its lack of recent feedback suggests it may not match Stayntouch’s current usability standards. Without recent reviews, it's difficult to assess how easily your team could adopt it.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 49 features, including revenue management, guest profiles, online check-in, mobile app, integrated payment processing, and extensive reporting. These features are designed explicitly for hotel operations, supporting guest engagement and operational efficiency.
Passepartout, on the other hand, has no publicly listed features. Its AI reviews suggest a focus on property management and tenant feedback, not hotel-specific features. If you need a hotel-centric PMS with rich functionalities, Stayntouch’s extensive feature set clearly outpaces Passepartout.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s customer support rates at 4.68/5, with recent reviews citing efficient, friendly, and responsive service. Hoteliers appreciate the ongoing support and smooth onboarding, with some mentioning the support team’s proactive approach during system implementation.
Passepartout’s support ratings are unavailable, and the absence of recent reviews makes it impossible to gauge support quality. Given Stayntouch’s established reputation, it holds the advantage here.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch boasts 188 verified integrations, including popular third-party systems like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and other hotel tech tools. This extensive network allows your hotel to connect seamlessly with revenue management, channel managers, and other solutions.
Passepartout has zero verified integrations, limiting its capacity to connect with other systems. For hotels seeking a flexible, interconnected platform, Stayntouch’s integrations provide a clear edge.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s recent reviews (26 in the last six months) reflect high satisfaction, with an average rating of 4.56/5 and 94% recommendability. Hotels of various sizes, including boutique properties and larger resorts, praise its ease of use, scalability, and support.
Passepartout has no recent reviews, making it impossible to determine current user satisfaction. Given the active, positive feedback for Stayntouch, it’s the preferred choice for hoteliers.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Passepartout’s pricing is not publicly available, which makes estimating total costs difficult. Typically, property management systems targeted at landlords and property portfolios can vary widely in pricing, often requiring custom quotes.
Stayntouch has a clear monthly fee of $800, with no implementation or extra charges disclosed. While potentially pricier, its transparent pricing model allows better budgeting and comparison.
Stayntouch offers a proven, hotel-oriented platform with a high user rating, extensive features, and active integrations. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use, rapid onboarding, and customer satisfaction, making it a reliable choice for most hotels.
Passepartout’s absence of recent reviews and lack of hotel-specific features suggest it’s less suited for hotels aiming for a modern, guest-centric environment. It may serve property managers outside the hotel sector better but isn’t recommended for hotel operations today.
If your hotel values a trusted, well-reviewed platform with strong support and integrations, Stayntouch is the clear winner. For property managers outside hospitality or with unique property needs, explore Passepartout further—but proceed with caution.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Passepartout |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Passepartout 和 Stayntouch 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 37 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Passepartout 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Passepartout 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Passepartout:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Passepartout 的 HT Score 为 0,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问