The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Fidelity |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 124 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #12 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 7 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Fidelity |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #6 79 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #8 39 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #7 38 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #5 52 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Fidelity |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #9 56 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #13 16 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #11 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #13 1 条评价 |
When choosing hotel management software, your team needs a solution that simplifies operations, enhances the guest experience, and supports growth. Fidelity by Fidelity and RMS by RMS both aim to meet these goals but approach them differently. Fidelity presents itself as a less conventional option with limited reviews and a small user base, whereas RMS boasts a robust presence, extensive features, and a large, recent review pool. Which of these options aligns best with your hotel's needs?
Fidelity’s low ratings and lack of recent reviews suggest limited current user confidence, whereas RMS’s high ratings and fresh feedback demonstrate ongoing satisfaction. Do you want a platform backed by a strong community and continuous updates, or are you willing to explore a lesser-known option?
Fidelity and RMS both aim to streamline hotel management but diverge significantly in scope and maturity. Fidelity's offering appears minimal, with no featured reviews and a niche presence, making it suitable for small or experimental hotels seeking a simple, straightforward solution. RMS, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive suite with 74 distinct features and over 224 recent reviews, showing broad adoption and ongoing refinement.
The RMS system’s extensive feature set—covering channel management, booking engines, guest CRM, and revenue management—makes it suitable for hotels looking for deep functionality across multiple departments. Fidelity’s absence of features and integrations suggests a more limited approach, better for hotels with minimal operational needs or those testing basic solutions.
Do you prioritize a platform with proven, extensive capabilities and a large user community, or are you comfortable with a smaller, more limited software?
Your choice depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and digital maturity. If your hotel needs a versatile, feature-rich platform capable of handling multiple properties, RMS is the clear choice, especially given its proven track record and recent positive reviews. Its wide integration network, including 112 verified partners, makes it adaptable for various tech stacks.
If your hotel is small, has minimal management needs, or prefers a less complex solution, Fidelity might suffice. However, with no recent reviews or features listed, it’s less reliable for larger or growth-oriented properties. RMS’s broad appeal and proven growth support make it the safer, more scalable option.
Are you seeking a feature-rich, well-supported platform or something simpler and less established?
Based on available ratings, RMS scores 4.3 out of 5 for ease of use, with positive reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding experiences. Several users highlight the platform’s quick setup, with one noting, “It was the easiest onboarding process I’ve had of any system.” RMS also maintains a high customer support rating of 4.52, with reviewers mentioning responsive, helpful assistance.
Fidelity’s usability score is unlisted, but the lack of recent reviews and features suggests limited user feedback, making it difficult to assess. Given RMS’s extensive features and high satisfaction ratings, it appears more user-friendly for hotel staff, especially during onboarding.
Edge: RMS.
RMS offers a comprehensive suite of 74 features, including channel management, booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, automated night audit, multi-lingual support, POS, group bookings, and more. It supports real-time reporting, automated reminders, and guest messaging, covering nearly every operational aspect.
Fidelity, on the other hand, has no listed features or integrations, indicating a minimal platform. Its narrow scope suggests it may lack the depth needed for hotels with complex operations or growth ambitions.
Edge: RMS.
RMS stands out with a support rating of 4.52, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses. Clients report the support team is proactive and knowledgeable, with statements like, “Yang Mae Kang from RMS assisted me in fixing the issue,” highlighting effective service.
Fidelity’s support rating isn’t available, and with no recent reviews, there’s no current data indicating support quality. RMS’s active support community and recent positive feedback make it the clear choice for hotels that value assistance when needed.
Edge: RMS.
RMS boasts 112 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, STR, HiJiffy, and more—covering channel management, payment processing, and guest engagement tools. These integrations enable a seamless tech environment, reducing manual work and increasing operational efficiency.
Fidelity reports no verified partners, suggesting limited or no integrations, which could hinder scalability or connection with other systems. For hotels seeking a flexible, connected platform, RMS’s extensive integration options are a significant advantage.
Edge: RMS.
With 25 recent reviews, RMS scores an impressive 4.56 out of 5, with many users praising its ease of operation, support, and feature set. Hotels across segments, especially those in boutique, resort, and motels, frequently recommend RMS, citing improved workflow and guest satisfaction.
Fidelity has no reviews in the last six months and a score of 0/5, indicating a lack of current user feedback and satisfaction. Hotels should favor RMS, given its active, positive community and recent reviews.
Edge: RMS.
Fidelity’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may be a bespoke or less transparent solution. RMS charges $700 per month as a base price, with no indication of additional fees, making it a predictable investment for most mid-sized hotels.
While RMS’s cost may seem high compared to basic solutions, its extensive feature set and support justify the price. Fidelity’s unclear pricing makes evaluating value difficult; RMS’s transparent cost structure is advantageous.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference hinges on scope and maturity. RMS offers a full-featured, scalable platform trusted by thousands of properties worldwide, backed by recent positive reviews and a broad integration network. Fidelity appears to be a minimal, less documented option with no recent feedback, making it less suitable for hotels aiming for growth or operational sophistication.
If your hotel needs an all-in-one, well-supported system with current positive feedback, RMS is the clear choice. Its extensive features, integrations, and proven support make it a safer investment for most hotels.
Choose RMS if you want a proven, comprehensive solution that can grow with your hotel. Fidelity might suit very small properties or those testing management systems, but it’s unlikely to meet the needs of expanding hotels or those requiring robust automation.
This comparison aims to help you make an informed decision. Both products serve different hotel profiles, but RMS’s recent reviews and broad features make it the more reliable, future-proof choice for most hotels today.
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的响应速度和问题解决能力备受好评。客户高度赞赏他们积极主动地解决问题以及在系统操作方面提供的帮助。
RMS Cloud 以其用户友好的界面而著称,简化了操作流程,缩短了员工培训时间。这种简化对于高效运营至关重要,尤其是在快节奏的工作环境中。
RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users apprec... RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users appreciate its role in enabling real-time coordination among various departments, thereby enhancing efficiency and guest experience.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户称赞该平台的自定义功能,允许他们调整入住流程和其他操作,以更好地满足自身需求。然而,一些评论指出,自定义报告功能需要改进。
尽管 RMS Cloud 提供多种报告,但用户反映报告自定义和访问某些设置方面存在困难。如果能改进这方面,就能简化生成可用于决策的实用信息的过程。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Fidelity 和 RMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Fidelity 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RMS 提供 112 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Fidelity:否。RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Fidelity 的 HT Score 为 0,RMS 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问