The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Access Management Solution (Server Based) and Developer SDK.
Staymyway 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.
基于 HTR 上 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 34 | 0 |
在分析了 34 条经验证的评价后,FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 用户最看重其 guest_experience, 易于使用, 客户支持,而 Staymyway 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Guest_experience
▾
|
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
远程和自行签入
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
关键特征
▾
|
|
|
−
成本效率
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店无钥匙门禁系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 18 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 6 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #5 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 24 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 8 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #3 7 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #12 12 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #10 20 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #3 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access and STAYmyway hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, guest experience priorities, and existing technology infrastructure. Both systems aim to improve access control with contactless solutions, but they approach this goal differently. FLEXIPASS offers a mature, well-reviewed platform with extensive integrations and proven results, while STAYmyway emphasizes flexibility and cost-effective deployment. Which aligns better with your hotel’s current priorities?
Both products address keyless entry to improve safety, reduce costs, and streamline check-in processes. FLEXIPASS, with its 33 reviews and a 4.9/5 overall rating, demonstrates a strong market presence and high customer satisfaction, especially in boutique and independent hotels. Conversely, STAYmyway, lacking reviews and overall ratings, suggests it’s less proven, though it offers Bluetooth and RFID options for flexible installations. Do you prioritize a proven solution backed by extensive customer feedback?
If your hotel needs a well-established system with a broad array of integrations and recent positive reviews, FLEXIPASS is the clear choice. It caters to properties of all sizes, especially boutique hotels, with a robust feature set and proven customer support. On the other hand, if your hotel values a flexible, cost-effective solution with Bluetooth and RFID capabilities, and you're willing to implement a less tested platform, STAYmyway might appeal. For most hotels seeking reliability, FLEXIPASS’s review volume and recency make it the better option.
FLEXIPASS earns a 4.65/5 ease of use rating from users, who praise its straightforward interface and quick onboarding process. Multiple reviews emphasize its user-friendly app and seamless integration with PMS systems like Cloudbeds and Mews. STAYmyway, lacking review data, provides minimal insight into its usability but touts straightforward deployment and compatibility with existing locks. Based on available data, FLEXIPASS’s high usability ratings give it the edge for hotels prioritizing ease of implementation.
FLEXIPASS offers nine shared features with STAYmyway, plus two unique to it: an Access Management Solution (Server Based) and a Developer SDK. These enable advanced control, customization, and integration capabilities. STAYmyway provides keyless entry and a mobile app but lacks the extensive management tools and SDK FlexiPass offers. Given the broader feature set and proven flexibility of FLEXIPASS, it clearly stands ahead in feature richness. Edge: FLEXIPASS.
FLEXIPASS’s customer support rates at 4.73/5, with reviews mentioning its quick, responsive, and professional support team. Many hoteliers highlight the support as a key factor in successful implementation and ongoing operation. STAYmyway, with no available reviews, offers no tangible evidence of support quality. For a hotel seeking reliable assistance, FLEXIPASS’s proven support system is the stronger choice.
FLEXIPASS integrates with 31 verified partners, including major PMS and lock providers like Cloudbeds, Vingcard, Salto, Dormakaba, and Winhotel. STAYmyway has only 7 verified integrations, with some common partners like Cloudbeds but fewer options overall. The broader, more diverse integration network makes FLEXIPASS better suited for hotels with complex or existing systems. Edge: FLEXIPASS.
FLEXIPASS’s ratings reflect a strong endorsement from hotels, especially boutique and independent properties, with an overall rating of 4.9/5, a 9.12/5 NPS score, and 94% likelihood to recommend. Its recent reviews reinforce satisfaction with ease of use, support, and value. STAYmyway, with no reviews or ratings, offers no comparable data. Based on current feedback, FLEXIPASS is the more trusted, highly-rated choice.
Both products do not publish fixed pricing; instead, they operate on custom quotes or unspecified models. FLEXIPASS’s pricing model includes a base, freemium, or monthly per-room options, but specifics aren’t provided. STAYmyway’s pricing is also not listed, emphasizing a turnkey, cost-effective approach. Without transparent pricing data, your decision should focus on value, feature fit, and proven support rather than cost alone.
FLEXIPASS is a well-established, review-backed platform offering extensive integrations, high usability ratings, and proven support. It suits hotels that need a reliable, mature solution with a broad feature set, especially for boutique and independent properties.
STAYmyway, while potentially suitable for properties seeking a flexible and budget-friendly approach, lacks reviews and a proven track record, making it riskier for hotels prioritizing reliability and comprehensive support.
If your hotel values proven performance and comprehensive integration, FLEXIPASS is the clear choice. For properties willing to trial a newer, less proven platform for potential cost savings and flexibility, STAYmyway could be considered, but with caution.
酒店无钥匙门禁系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 和 STAYmyway 共享 9 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 开发者 SDK | ||
| 无钥匙进入 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 访问管理解决方案(基于服务器) |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统通过提供非接触式客房出入解决方案,显著改善了客人体验,这在疫情期间尤其有益。客人认为该应用程序很方便,并欣赏快速、轻松的入住流程。
许多评论称赞 FLEXIPASS 易于使用,无论是对客人还是员工而言。该系统允许客人通过应用程序访问他们的房间,通过快速简便的入住流程提升客人体验。
许多人称赞 FLEXIPASS 的客户服务出色,支持团队反应迅速。不过,一些评论指出,远程支持和售后服务还有待改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户提到需要一些功能,例如房间的多个钥匙选项以及与 PMS 系统的更好集成。有些人发现系统很复杂,或者在初始设置和支持方面存在问题。
许多评论都提到,使用 FLEXIPASS 的一大优势是节省成本。减少实体钥匙卡的使用,减少员工互动的频率,可以降低运营成本。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 和 STAYmyway 共享许多核心 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 提供 31 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAYmyway 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access:否。STAYmyway:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 的 HT Score 为 75,Staymyway 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问