项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 210 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 在智能手机移动开门方面表现出色,尤其适合长住住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有白标能力等独家功能。
Goki 在性价比方面表现出色,尤其适合赌场住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有门锁升级套件以及苹果手表应用等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 210 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $400/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 36 | 174 |
在分析了 210 条经验证的评价后,FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 用户最看重其 智能手机移动开门, 更快的入住登记和减轻前台工作负担, 宾客便利与自由,而 Goki 用户则强调 手机无钥匙访问和便捷入住, 宾客沟通与消息传递, 安全与门禁控制。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
智能手机移动开门
▾
|
+
手机无钥匙访问和便捷入住
▾
|
|
+
更快的入住登记和减轻前台工作负担
▾
|
+
宾客沟通与消息传递
▾
|
|
+
宾客便利与自由
▾
|
+
安全与门禁控制
▾
|
|
+
无钥匙进入酒店客房及设施
▾
|
+
推广活动、项目和增销
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
数字钥匙交付的速度与灵活性
▾
|
−
代码生成和PIN使用性问题
▾
|
|
−
与PMS/消息工作流的集成
▾
|
−
硬件兼容性和部署限制
▾
|
|
−
新合作伙伴的设置工作量
▾
|
−
Wi‑Fi/互联网依赖性和可靠性
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店无钥匙进入系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 18 条评价 | #1 85 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #10 8 条评价 | #2 58 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 6 条评价 | #4 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #6 2 条评价 | #2 11 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 25 条评价 | #2 50 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | #3 31 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 8 条评价 | #5 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #3 7 条评价 | #1 21 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 12 条评价 | #5 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 22 条评价 | #1 45 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #4 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #3 1 条评价 | — |
FLEXIPASS and Goki both serve as keyless entry systems that automate guest access from check-in to check-out, aiming to reduce front desk workload and enhance guest experiences through contactless room entry. They share core capabilities such as mobile keys, PIN codes, and integration with key PMS platforms. However, they diverge sharply in their target hotel segments and operational focus.
FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access is optimized for boutique hotels, serviced apartments, and properties seeking a lock-agnostic, API-driven platform that integrates with various door lock brands and guest communication channels. It excels at delivering app-free digital keys through email or messaging, enabling properties without 24-hour reception to reduce manual check-in tasks. Goki, by contrast, is favored by hostels, limited-service hotels, and properties with a focus on integrated hardware and streamlined operational workflows. Its proprietary smart locks and integrated messaging system enable hotels to promote guest activities and support revenue generation alongside access control.
Both products solve the problem of inefficient and costly physical keys by automating room access and reducing front desk interactions, which improves operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
If you operate a boutique hotel or serviced apartment in Europe or North America and prioritize seamless integration with multiple PMS and door lock brands, FLEXIPASS is the better choice. Its 40% user base in boutique hotels and 6% in serviced apartments, combined with a 4.7/5 overall rating across 36 reviews, support this fit. FLEXIPASS’s open API and app-free WebKeys suit properties looking to minimize guest friction during check-in via common channels like email and WhatsApp.
Conversely, if your property is a hostel, budget hotel, or limited-service property—particularly outside the luxury segment—and you need an integrated hardware-software solution with smart locks, Goki is more appropriate. Goki’s 51% user base in hostels and 114 reviews rating 4.8/5 in limited-service hotels underscore this. Goki’s integrated messaging and promotion features help drive ancillary revenue and guest engagement, which suits hostels and motels with limited staff.
Data for vacation rentals and luxury hotels is thin for both products, though FLEXIPASS has a small presence (8% vacation rentals, 3% luxury) with mixed ratings, while Goki’s few vacation rental reviews rate 5/5 but represent a very small sample. Properties in these segments should evaluate feature fit carefully.
FLEXIPASS and Goki score similarly on ease of use and onboarding, with FLEXIPASS rated 4.6/5 ease of use and 4.5/5 onboarding versus Goki’s 4.8/5 and 4.6/5, respectively. Reviewers of both highlight intuitive guest experiences; FLEXIPASS users praise the simple app setup where guests download an app and enter a code received by email for immediate access. Goki users emphasize a slick UI and one-click code creation, supporting easy late check-ins.
Some FLEXIPASS reviews note occasional complexity with support and integration, while Goki reviewers mention installation challenges and occasional connectivity issues. Both systems require some technical support during deployment, but ongoing guest use is generally straightforward.
Edge: Even.
FLEXIPASS offers a unique Whitelabel Capability, allowing hotels to fully brand the digital key experience across apps and communications, which can strengthen guest loyalty and brand consistency. Goki includes a Door Lock Upgrade Kit and an Apple Watch app, extending hardware flexibility and guest convenience through wearable access.
Both share 10 core features such as mobile keys, PIN codes, and digital key management. FLEXIPASS’s whitelabeling enables hotels to customize guest-facing touchpoints, which operationally means the front desk and marketing teams can leverage branded communications without relying on generic third-party apps. Goki’s Apple Watch app adds a guest convenience layer by enabling door access without a phone, useful for active or tech-savvy guests.
Edge: FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access for the whitelabel feature.
Customer support ratings are close: FLEXIPASS scores 4.6/5 versus Goki’s 4.7/5, with onboarding ratings also similar (4.5 vs 4.6). FLEXIPASS reviewers praise responsive, hands-on support, especially during integrations, describing the vendor as collaborative and quick to resolve issues. However, some mention remote support limitations and inconsistent after-sales service.
Goki users highlight fast, accurate replies and comprehensive support during installation and operation, though some report delays linked to geographic time zones and the need to find local electricians for hardware installation. Neither product has a clear advantage in support quality based on verified reviews.
Edge: Even.
FLEXIPASS supports 32 verified partners, 45% more than Goki’s 22. Both integrate with major PMSs like Mews, Cloudbeds, Access Hospitality, and HiJiffy, covering core hotel operations. FLEXIPASS’s exclusive integrations include Visual Matrix PMS, RoomRaccoon, SALTO Systems, and Revinate, which enhance compatibility with a broader range of hotel management and guest engagement platforms.
Goki’s unique integrations such as Bookboost, Preno, WebRezPro, RMS, Yanolja Cloud Solution, and Twilio enable additional guest communication and event promotion capabilities, appealing to properties focused on marketing and operational outreach.
For hotels prioritizing widespread PMS compatibility and door lock hardware options, FLEXIPASS’s larger integration ecosystem provides operational flexibility and reduces vendor lock-in. For properties emphasizing guest communication or activity promotion, Goki’s integrations add value.
Edge: FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access.
Overall, Goki has a marginally higher rating of 4.8/5 across 174 reviews compared to FLEXIPASS’s 4.7/5 across 36. However, Goki’s review activity has dropped sharply to zero in the last six months versus an average of 13.3 per six months previously, raising questions about how well its all-time rating reflects recent product or support quality. FLEXIPASS’s two recent reviews, while limited, maintain positive feedback.
Segment-level ratings show FLEXIPASS leads in serviced apartments (5/5 from 7 reviews) and boutique hotels (4.7/5 from 25), while Goki dominates in hostels (4.8/5 from 116 reviews) and limited-service hotels (4.8/5 from 114). Both score well in luxury hotels (FLEXIPASS 4.6/5, Goki 4.8/5). FLEXIPASS’s boutique hotel users report strong satisfaction, reflecting its fit for smaller, design-focused properties. Goki’s dominance in hostels and budget hotels reflects its hardware-focused approach and scalable system design.
Edge: Even.
FLEXIPASS does not publish pricing publicly, with no base price, monthly, or implementation fees listed. Goki charges a $400 base price per lock, with no monthly fees or trials offered. Goki’s up-front hardware cost model suits properties ready to invest in smart locks outright, while FLEXIPASS’s pricing model is opaque and likely varies based on integration and scale.
Hotels seeking transparent, predictable hardware costs may prefer Goki’s pricing clarity. Those wanting software-focused flexibility without hardware mandates may inquire with FLEXIPASS for tailored quotes.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
FLEXIPASS and Goki both provide effective keyless entry systems that reduce physical key dependency and streamline guest access. FLEXIPASS offers a software-centric platform with an open API, broad PMS and lock integrations, and app-free digital keys that fit boutique hotels and serviced apartments aiming to automate check-in workflows. Goki combines integrated hardware with software designed for hostels and budget hotels, adding guest communication tools that promote ancillary revenue.
Choose FLEXIPASS if your hotel values wide compatibility with existing lock hardware and PMS, needs an app-free guest key experience, and wants to reduce front desk labor in boutique or serviced apartment settings. Its whitelabel capability and larger integration ecosystem deliver operational flexibility.
Choose Goki if your property is a hostel, limited-service hotel, or motel that benefits from an all-in-one hardware-software solution with smart locks, integrated guest messaging, and transparent hardware pricing. Goki’s strong user satisfaction in high-volume hostel environments reflects its operational fit.
Note that while Goki holds a slightly higher all-time rating (4.8/5 vs 4.7/5), its review activity has dropped 100% in the last six months from 13.3 average to zero, signaling that its historical rating may not represent current performance. FLEXIPASS has fewer reviews but recent positive feedback. This drop should inform your confidence in each product’s ongoing support and reliability.
酒店无钥匙进入系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $400/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
门五金
|
|
|
| 门五金和锁具 | ||
| 门锁升级套件 | ||
|
▾
访问管理
|
|
|
| 访问管理(基于云) | ||
| 访问管理解决方案(基于服务器) | ||
| 访客管理仪表板 | ||
| Google 钱包集成 | ||
| 多物业管理 | ||
| 通知 | ||
|
▾
访客应用
|
|
|
| 移动应用 | ||
| 白标能力 | ||
| 远程签到 | ||
| 无钥匙进入 | ||
| 苹果手表应用 | ||
|
▾
兼容性
|
|
|
| 门锁升级套件 | ||
| 苹果手表应用 | ||
| 开发者 SDK | ||
| Google 钱包集成 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want our competitive advantage to be our Efficiency, we seek to differentiate ourselves from the positioning of traditional hostels that run manual operations and define our ide..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"THE BLUE was one of the first fully digital hotels in Australia and with goki having the integration to our preferred PMS it was a no brainer to give it a go. With a contactless an..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
客人可以直接通过手机开门,通常只需几秒钟,无需在前台等待或使用实体钥匙。评论者认为这加快了入住速度,使住宿体验更加现代和便捷。
FLEXIPASS 减少了前台的钥匙交接工作,使员工能够专注于款待服务而非行政任务。用户强调,这不仅能提升运营效率,还能缩短客人到达的流程。
用户表示该系统通过让宾客无需依赖员工或传统入住流程即可进入房间,赋予了宾客更多自主权。这种便利被视为对整体宾客体验的显著提升。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
评论者描述FLEXIPASS非常快速且灵活,数字钥匙能在几秒内传送到智能手机。这种速度支持更顺畅的入住流程,帮助酒店提供更无障碍的门禁体验。
一个反复出现的实施主题是需要将FLEXIPASS与酒店的PMS和消息系统无缝连接。一位评审指出,自动传递正确的客人信息需要付出努力,而一个更现成的Cloudbeds工作流... 一个反复出现的实施主题是需要将FLEXIPASS与酒店的PMS和消息系统无缝连接。一位评审指出,自动传递正确的客人信息需要付出努力,而一个更现成的Cloudbeds工作流将帮助酒店更快启动。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
评论者最常强调Goki的核心价值:让客人通过手机或代码解锁房间,而非使用实体钥匙或卡片。这减少了前台工作,加快了入住/退房流程,并使非营业时间或无人值守酒... 评论者最常强调Goki的核心价值:让客人通过手机或代码解锁房间,而非使用实体钥匙或卡片。这减少了前台工作,加快了入住/退房流程,并使非营业时间或无人值守酒店的入住更加顺畅。
许多用户表示,Goki通过应用内消息和及时更新改善了与宾客的沟通。酒店利用它快速回答问题,分享运营通知,减少入住期间的摩擦,从而提升宾客体验。
用户始终重视数字门禁相较于实体钥匙和卡片的更强安全性。他们指出,退房后可以撤销访问权限,系统为员工和客人都提供了安心保障。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一个反复出现的问题是生成的代码可能过长、出现时间过长,或在其他方面让客人使用时感到不便。这些挫折感会使入住流程不如预期的顺畅。
一小部分但重要的评论指出了混合使用新旧硬件或等待产品交付时的挑战。这些评论表明,当酒店已有现有门锁系统时,实施可能更为复杂。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 和 Goki 共享许多核心 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Goki 提供 22 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Goki 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access:否。Goki:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access 的 HT Score 为 80,Goki 的为 98。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐