The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 134 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Folio 表现出色 在 customer support and onboarding 方面 .
Sertifi by Flywire 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Tokenization and 3-D Secure Payments.
基于 HTR 上 134 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 3 | 131 |
在分析了 134 条经验证的评价后,Folio 用户最看重其 ,而 Sertifi by Flywire 用户则强调 易于使用, 支付处理效率, 安全措施。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
支付处理效率
▾
|
|
|
+
安全措施
▾
|
|
|
+
文档管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
与其他系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
用户角色管理
▾
|
|
|
−
可定制性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #5 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 36 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 3 条评价 | #1 63 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 29 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 1 条评价 | #1 61 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 2 条评价 | #1 86 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #2 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 3 条评价 | #1 121 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #4 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #1 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #1 5 条评价 |
Choosing the right payments processing software for your hotel hinges on understanding how each solution aligns with your operational needs, security concerns, and growth ambitions. Folio Pay by Folio and Sertifi by Flywire both aim to streamline payments, but they do so through different approaches and feature sets. Folio Pay offers a cloud-based, procure-to-pay focus with cashback incentives, whereas Sertifi emphasizes fast, secure transactions and e-signature capabilities. Which one best suits your hotel’s priorities?
While Folio Pay has a limited review count, Sertifi’s extensive recent feedback and higher overall ratings provide a clearer picture of user satisfaction. Does your hotel prioritize recent, proven performance, or are you looking for a platform with unique financial benefits?
Folio Pay and Sertifi both aim to simplify hotel payments, but their core offerings diverge significantly. Folio Pay integrates as part of a broader procure-to-pay system, designed to optimize supplier payments, reduce risks, and generate rebates through its automation. Sertifi, on the other hand, centers on fast, PCI-compliant payment collection combined with electronic signatures, focusing on operational speed and security.
Folio Pay’s strength lies in managing accounts payable and offering financial incentives, which is ideal for hotels with complex procurement processes looking to optimize cash flow. Sertifi’s speed, ease of use, and security appeal to hotels prioritizing quick deposits, operational simplicity, and compliance. Are you seeking to enhance payment control and rebates, or streamline transaction speed and security?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive accounts payable solution that offers rebate incentives, detailed control, and integration with procurement workflows, Folio Pay is the better pick. Its focus on automating supplier payments and maximizing rebates makes it ideal for larger hotels or those with sophisticated finance teams.
Conversely, if your hotel needs a fast, secure platform for collecting payments and eSignatures with minimal setup, Sertifi is the right choice. Its straightforward interface, strong security, and extensive integrations—especially with platforms like Opera and Salesforce—make it suitable for hotels seeking operational efficiency and quick cash flow.
For hotels prioritizing procure-to-pay automation and rebates, go with Folio Pay. If speed, security, and ease of transaction are paramount, choose Sertifi.
Folio Pay boasts a 5/5 ease-of-use rating based on its intuitive, cloud-based interface designed for finance teams. Its onboarding process is rated equally high, reflecting straightforward setup, though reviews are limited. Users find the platform simplifies supplier management and payment scheduling.
Sertifi scores 4.78/5, with reviews consistently praising its user-friendly design that’s easy for both staff and clients to navigate. Its onboarding is efficient, and users appreciate the clear, simple interface that speeds up payment collection and agreement signing.
Edge: Folio Pay, due to its higher ease-of-use rating and straightforward financial management focus.
Folio Pay offers features tailored to supplier payments and procurement, including virtual accounts, automated rebates, and an all-in-one payment hub. However, it lacks the extensive payment processing features found in Sertifi.
Sertifi by Flywire provides over 20 unique features—including PCI compliance, payment tokenization, multi-currency support, chargeback management, and integrations with platforms like Oracle, Infor, and Stripe. These features enhance security, flexibility, and operational speed, which Folio Pay does not currently match.
Edge: Sertifi by Flywire, with a broader suite of payment and security features.
Folio Pay’s review count is limited, but the available feedback highlights a 5/5 customer support rating, emphasizing satisfaction with their responsiveness and effective assistance. Users find the onboarding smooth and support attentive.
Sertifi also earns a solid 4.59/5, with users noting that support is quick and helpful, especially when resolving issues. Reviews mention that customer service is attentive, though some suggest improvements in user role management.
Edge: Folio Pay, given its higher recent support rating and limited but positive feedback.
Folio Pay has no verified integrations, which might limit its connectivity with other hotel management or financial systems. Its ecosystem is more self-contained, focusing on supplier payments within its platform.
Sertifi offers seven verified integrations, including major platforms like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, Amadeus, Stripe, and Opera. These integrations facilitate smoother workflows, reduce manual data entry, and streamline payment and agreement processes.
Edge: Sertifi by Flywire, with a more extensive and practical set of integrations.
Sertifi’s overall rating of 94.14/100 reflects extensive recent reviews from over 100 users, many of whom from hotel segments like luxury, branded, and resort properties. Hotels praised its speed, security, and ease of use, with comments like "extremely easy to use for clients" and "saves time on administrative tasks."
Folio Pay’s ratings are based on only 3 reviews, with consistent positive comments about its simplicity, but the limited data makes it less reliable as a benchmark. Its recent review data is stronger, but Sertifi’s higher volume and recent feedback make it the clearer leader.
Edge: Sertifi by Flywire, based on higher review count and stronger recent ratings.
Folio Pay does not list specific pricing, with no implementation or monthly fees detailed. It appears to be part of Folio’s broader platform, likely requiring a custom quote based on hotel size and needs.
Sertifi charges a base fee of $100 per month, with no additional implementation costs. Its pricing model is straightforward, but additional charges may apply for certain integrations or features.
In summary, Sertifi’s transparent and predictable pricing may appeal to hotels seeking clarity, while Folio Pay’s cost structure is less transparent.
Hotels that could benefit from Folio Pay’s strengths include:
Not ideal if:
Ideal hotels for Sertifi are:
Not ideal if:
Sertifi stands out with a comprehensive feature set, strong recent reviews, and widespread hotel adoption, making it the more reliable choice for most hotels. Its focus on fast, secure payments and agreement management fits a broad range of hospitality settings.
Folio Pay offers a valuable solution for larger, procurement-heavy hotels aiming for rebate incentives and detailed control over supplier payments. However, its limited reviews and narrower focus make it less compelling unless those specific features are a top priority.
In conclusion, if your hotel needs proven, high-rated payment and agreement solutions with extensive integrations, Sertifi is the safer bet. For hotels focused on procurement automation, rebates, and more complex accounts payable, Folio Pay could be a strategic addition—if your team is prepared for its current limited review footprint.
支付处理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Folio Pay 和 Sertifi by Flywire (Payments) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 3-D 安全支付 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 接受美国运通 | ||
| 支付标记化 | ||
| 链接支付 | ||
| 预授权 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sertifi 因其用户友好的界面而备受关注,酒店员工和客户都可以轻松浏览。培训新用户所需的时间和精力减少,简化了入职流程,这一点值得赞赏。
Sertifi 的支付处理因其速度和效率而受到称赞,它允许客户快速安全地付款。设置付款时间表和发送安全付款链接的功能被视为节省大量时间,使酒店能够减少管理任务... Sertifi 的支付处理因其速度和效率而受到称赞,它允许客户快速安全地付款。设置付款时间表和发送安全付款链接的功能被视为节省大量时间,使酒店能够减少管理任务并增加现金流。
用户一致称赞 Sertifi 的强大安全功能,这对于处理敏感支付数据至关重要。PCI 合规性确保交易安全,让客户和酒店都对通过该系统处理付款充满信心。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
许多用户欣赏 Sertifi 与 Salesforce 和 Opera 等系统的集成能力,这通过减少手动输入和检查的需要简化了操作。
有人批评用户角色管理存在问题,例如用户离职后难以撤销访问权限。用户建议改进权限处理和用户停用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Folio Pay 和 Sertifi by Flywire (Payments) 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Folio Pay 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sertifi by Flywire (Payments) 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Folio Pay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Folio Pay:否。Sertifi by Flywire (Payments):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Folio 的 HT Score 为 0,Sertifi by Flywire 的为 94。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问