The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 13 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 3 条评价 | #2 21 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 25 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 31 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 1 条评价 | #2 34 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 2 条评价 | #2 28 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #3 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 3 条评价 | #2 61 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #3 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right payments processing software for your hotel is critical. Folio Pay by Folio and ROH by ROH both aim to streamline financial transactions, but they approach this goal differently. Folio Pay, with only 3 reviews, is newer and less proven, whereas ROH, with 65 reviews and recent feedback, offers a more established track record. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and how much confidence you place in recent customer experiences.
Both products address payment automation, but ROH’s broader feature set and more extensive support infrastructure give it a distinct advantage. Do you prioritize proven performance with extensive features, or are you looking for a newer solution with focused capabilities?
Both Folio Pay and ROH target hotel payment workflows, but their core strengths differ. Folio Pay emphasizes transforming accounts payable through rebates and flexible vendor payments, integrating tightly with folio’s procure-to-pay system. ROH, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive platform with 19 exclusive features aimed at automating guest and hotel payments, including invoice management and scheduling.
Folio Pay’s minimal review count and lack of recent feedback mean its reputation is less certain. ROH, with 10 recent reviews and an overall high score, clearly demonstrates its market presence. Which approach aligns more with your hotel’s ongoing operational focus?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cloud-based supplier payment platform with rebate incentives, Folio Pay could be suitable. It's designed for teams that want to improve accounts payable processes, especially if already invested in Folio’s broader procure-to-pay ecosystem.
Conversely, if you seek a flexible, feature-rich payment solution capable of managing guest payments, invoicing, and scheduling with extensive integrations, ROH is the better choice. Its 19 exclusive features and strong user feedback make it more adaptable across different property types and operational sizes, especially in the luxury or resort segments.
For most hotels aiming for proven, comprehensive functionality, ROH’s proven track record makes it the safer pick. Folio Pay may be attractive for those seeking a niche solution with rebates, but its limited review data warrants caution.
Folio Pay excels in ease of use, earning a 5/5 rating from its few reviews, with users describing it as an “easy system to handle” and “excellent tool” that allows vendors to be paid quickly. Its interface is praised for simplicity, although some note transfer times could improve. Given its minimal review count, these insights are tentative but positive.
ROH also boasts a very high ease-of-use rating at 4.95/5, with reviews highlighting its user-friendly, intuitive interface. Users appreciate how quickly both hotel staff and clients adapt to the platform, making payment processes smooth and straightforward.
Edge: Folio.
ROH offers a significantly broader feature set with 19 exclusive capabilities, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, pay-by-link, recurring payments, and acceptance of multiple card types like Apple Pay and Google Pay. These features support complex, multi-layered payment workflows suited for large or sophisticated hotel operations.
Folio Pay provides core payment processing functions but lacks the extensive feature variety found in ROH. It focuses more on transforming accounts payable processes and generating rebates rather than offering a wide array of payment tools.
Edge: ROH.
Both products demonstrate strong support reputations, but ROH’s support ratings are slightly higher at 4.97/5, with reviews praising its support staff as “great” and its onboarding as “smooth.” ROH’s ongoing support and training appear more established, especially given its larger user base.
Folio Pay, with a 5/5 support rating, is described as meeting needs effectively, but with fewer reviews and less recent feedback, its support reputation isn’t as robust.
Edge: ROH.
ROH has one verified integration with Oracle Hospitality, giving it a slight edge in connectivity. Folio Pay currently has no verified partners, limiting its integration options and possibly requiring manual processes or custom solutions for other hotel systems.
The limited integrations of Folio Pay could pose challenges for hotels seeking seamless technology ecosystems. ROH’s existing integration demonstrates its capacity to connect with major hotel systems, enhancing operational efficiency.
Edge: ROH.
ROH’s review count of 65, with recent feedback from 10 users, provides a more reliable gauge of hotel satisfaction. It scores consistently high on ease of use, support, and value, especially among luxury and resort hotels that praise its automation and real-time reporting.
Folio Pay, with only 3 reviews, is less proven. Its ratings are perfect based on limited data, but the small sample size and recency mean we should approach its reputation cautiously.
Edge: ROH.
Folio Pay does not disclose pricing details publicly, which may suggest custom quotes based on hotel size or needs. ROH charges a straightforward $100/month fee, with no trial or additional setup costs.
For budget-conscious hotels, the transparency of ROH’s pricing is advantageous, while Folio Pay’s custom pricing could either be a benefit or obstacle depending on your hotel’s negotiation flexibility.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ROH’s broader, more feature-rich platform and extensive recent reviews make it the most reliable choice for hotels seeking a proven, scalable payments solution. Its capacity to automate both guest and vendor payments, combined with strong support and integrations, addresses a wide array of hotel operational needs.
Folio Pay’s niche focus on accounts payable and rebates might appeal to hotels with specific procurement strategies, especially those already invested in Folio’s ecosystem. However, its limited review data and fewer features make it less suitable for hotels looking for a comprehensive payments platform.
In summary, if you want a dependable, highly-rated platform with proven hotel industry support, go with ROH. If your primary focus is supplier rebates and procurement control within Folio’s environment, Folio Pay could fit. For most hotels, ROH’s extensive recent positive feedback and feature set make it the safer, more confident choice.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH 因其直观的界面而备受赞誉,酒店员工和客户均可轻松使用。该平台简化了付款和收款流程,带来更顺畅的交易体验,并提升用户满意度。
用户对 ROH 提供的初始培训和持续支持表示赞赏,这有助于确保软件的顺利采用。这对于新用户的入门或有效解决复杂问题尤其有益。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在... 虽然 ROH 显著节省了时间,但一些用户建议改进与现有酒店系统(例如 PMS 和销售软件)的集成,以进一步提高效率。这包括与 Salesforce、Delphi 和 Opera 的潜在集成。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Folio Pay 和 ROH 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Folio Pay 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ROH 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Folio Pay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 5.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Folio Pay:否。ROH:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Folio 的 HT Score 为 0,ROH 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问