IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) vs. MyStay: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 140 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 140 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Frontline Performance Group 表现出色 在 追加销售跟踪与报告 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Performance Reporting & Offer Analytics and Check-In & On-Property Upsell Support.

MyStay 表现出色 在 定制和灵活性 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Digital Acceptance & Payment Capture.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) 与 MyStay 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 140 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
81
19
推荐可能性
97%
96%
易用性
4.8/5
4.9/5
客户支持
4.9/5
4.9/5
性价比
4.7/5
4.8/5
起始价格 From $400/mo From $400/mo
经验证的评价 95 45

IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) 与 MyStay 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 140 条经验证的评价后,Frontline Performance Group 用户最看重其 追加销售跟踪与报告, 易用性和集成性, 绩效指标与目标设定,而 MyStay 用户则强调 定制和灵活性, 与宾客沟通, 高效的办理登机手续。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Frontline Performance Group Frontline Performance Group MyStay MyStay
优点
+ 追加销售跟踪与报告
+ 定制和灵活性
+ 易用性和集成性
+ 与宾客沟通
+ 绩效指标与目标设定
+ 高效的办理登机手续
+ 培训与发展
+ 非接触式服务
缺点
人工数据跟踪
与 PMS 集成

Frontline Performance Group 对比 MyStay:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 追加销售软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Frontline Performance Group Frontline Performance Group MyStay MyStay
小型(10-24 间客房) #6 17 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #9 16 条评价 #11 13 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #5 29 条评价 #11 6 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #5 19 条评价 #12 2 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Frontline Performance Group Frontline Performance Group MyStay MyStay
精品酒店 #9 19 条评价 #11 14 条评价
豪华酒店 #6 40 条评价 #13 12 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #5 46 条评价 #10 13 条评价
长住酒店 #13 1 条评价 #7 6 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Frontline Performance Group Frontline Performance Group MyStay MyStay
北美 #4 25 条评价 #16 1 条评价
欧洲 #18 5 条评价 #5 36 条评价
亚太 #5 12 条评价 #11 1 条评价
中东 #3 14 条评价 #8 1 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between IN-Gauge by Frontline Performance Group and MyStay hinges on your hotel's specific needs around upselling, guest engagement, and operational complexity. Both tools aim to boost revenue and guest satisfaction, but they do so with very different approaches. IN-Gauge emphasizes performance analytics, staff incentives, and detailed reporting, while MyStay focuses on contactless check-in, personalized communication, and guest-centric upselling. Which of these aligns better with your hotel’s growth strategy?

IN-Gauge is an established platform with over 90 reviews, most recent within the last six months, and a high rating of 4.69/5 for value. MyStay, although newer with 41 reviews, boasts a high overall rating of 4.82/5, but lacks recent feedback. The stronger review count and recency favor IN-Gauge as the more dependable choice today. Are you ready to prioritize a mature system with proven analytics, or a newer, guest-friendly platform focusing on contactless experiences?

Is IN-Gauge or MyStay Better for Hotels?

Both IN-Gauge and MyStay tackle upselling and guest engagement, but they approach it differently. IN-Gauge is designed for performance-driven hotels seeking precise analytics, staff motivation tools, and revenue control, making it ideal for properties that want granular oversight and staff incentives. MyStay, by contrast, is suited for hotels prioritizing contactless check-in, automated communication, and seamless upselling, especially during and post-pandemic.

While IN-Gauge integrates with multiple PMS systems and offers advanced features like offer suppression and dynamic pricing, MyStay emphasizes easy-to-use digital marketing tools, QR code ordering, and automated messaging. Do you need detailed performance management or a simplified guest experience?

Edge: IN-Gauge

Which Should Your Hotel Choose: IN-Gauge or MyStay?

If your hotel needs a comprehensive performance and revenue management system with detailed analytics, staff incentive tools, and multi-property oversight, go with IN-Gauge. Its robust feature set—like performance reporting, offer analytics, and staff fulfillment visibility—supports large or complex operations aiming for precise profit control.

If your hotel requires a straightforward, contactless solution with automated communication, digital upselling, and streamlined guest service, MyStay is the better fit. Its easy integration, guest personalization, and focus on the entire guest journey make it ideal for smaller hotels, boutique properties, or those emphasizing a modern guest experience. Which approach best fits your hotel’s operational focus?

Edge: IN-Gauge

Is IN-Gauge or MyStay Easier to Use?

IN-Gauge has a user-friendly interface rated 4.76/5, but some users report occasional anomalies and report inaccuracies, which can complicate daily use. Its onboarding process is rated 4.78/5, and support from the dedicated team is praised, but the system’s complexity might require more training for staff unfamiliar with analytics-heavy platforms.

MyStay, rated 4.85/5 in ease of use, offers an intuitive interface praised for its simplicity and seamless PMS integration. Users highlight its straightforward setup, especially for contactless check-in and automated communication, which reduces staff training time.

Edge: MyStay

Which Has Better Features: IN-Gauge or MyStay?

IN-Gauge offers 11 unique features, including multi-property dashboards, SOC 2 Data Security certification, offer suppression controls, and dynamic upgrade pricing—features that support large chains and performance-focused hotels. It also supports check-in and on-property upsell, making it highly versatile for complex operations.

MyStay provides three exclusive features: segmentation, offer orchestration across the guest journey, and digital payment capture—all designed for personalized, contactless guest experiences. Its features are more streamlined but less extensive compared to IN-Gauge.

Edge: IN-Gauge

Which Has Better Customer Support: IN-Gauge or MyStay?

IN-Gauge’s support, rated 4.9/5, is highly praised with reviews emphasizing the responsiveness and personal engagement of consultants like Lauren and Alfredo. Clients mention receiving tailored guidance and ongoing mentorship that significantly boost their upsell results.

MyStay’s support is rated 4.85/5, with positive comments on its quick response and helpful onboarding. Users appreciate the seamless communication with the support team, especially during system implementation and updates.

Edge: IN-Gauge

Which Has More Integrations: IN-Gauge or MyStay?

MyStay boasts 30 verified integrations, including key PMS and channel managers like Oracle Hospitality, Kwentra, and WuBook, offering broader connectivity. Its extensive partner network makes it adaptable to various hotel tech stacks.

IN-Gauge has 3 verified partners, including Shiji Group and Stayntouch, with fewer integrations but a focus on performance analytics and staff incentives. The limited integration options could be a constraint for hotels seeking a highly connected system.

Edge: MyStay

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: IN-Gauge or MyStay?

IN-Gauge’s reviews are mostly older, with 85 reviews rating it 0/5, which suggests limited recent data or possible issues that have impacted user ratings. Its NPS score of 9.7/10 indicates high satisfaction among its existing users, especially in larger hotel groups.

MyStay’s 40 reviews rate it 4.82/5, with recent feedback praising its user-friendly interface and effective upselling features. Given the high recent ratings and newer reviews, MyStay’s user satisfaction remains very high, especially for smaller and boutique hotels.

Edge: MyStay

How Much Do IN-Gauge and MyStay Cost?

Both IN-Gauge and MyStay have a flat base price of $400 per month, with no freemium or trial options listed. Additional costs may depend on integration complexity or optional features, but standard pricing appears identical.

What Type of Hotel Should Use IN-Gauge?

  • Hotels that want to optimize revenue through detailed analytics and staff incentives.
  • Properties with multiple locations that need centralized performance dashboards.
  • Branded or chain hotels aiming to track and improve upselling efforts.
  • Larger resorts with dedicated F&B outlets seeking revenue management solutions.
  • Teams aiming to align staff behavior with financial goals via automated incentive programs.

Not ideal if your hotel prefers a lightweight, contactless guest experience or has limited staff resources.

What Type of Hotel Should Use MyStay?

  • Boutique, small, or independent hotels wanting a simple, integrated contactless solution.
  • Hotels emphasizing digital guest engagement and personalized upselling.
  • Properties looking for a quick-to-deploy platform that improves operational efficiency.
  • Hotels with PMS systems compatible with MyStay’s extensive partner network.
  • Hotels seeking a modern, app-free solution with online check-in, check-out, and digital catalogs.

Not ideal if your hotel requires performance analytics, detailed staff incentives, or multi-property management.

IN-Gauge vs MyStay: The Bottom Line for Hotels

IN-Gauge is the more established platform with a broad feature set designed for performance analytics, staff incentives, and revenue management. Its extensive integrations and proven track record make it suitable for larger, chain, or brand hotels focusing on revenue optimization and staff performance.

MyStay offers a guest-centric, contactless experience emphasizing automation, personalization, and ease of use. It’s best for smaller hotels or properties prioritizing seamless guest engagement and operational simplicity.

Choose IN-Gauge if your hotel needs detailed analytics, multi-property oversight, and staff incentive tools. Opt for MyStay if your focus is on contactless check-in, automated communication, and upselling with less complexity.

In summary, if recent reviews and broader integrations matter most, IN-Gauge’s long-standing reputation and recent feedback make it the more dependable choice today. However, for a modern, guest-friendly platform with high satisfaction and easy deployment, MyStay stands out despite fewer recent reviews.

IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) 和 MyStay 的价格是多少?

追加销售软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Frontline Performance Group Frontline Performance Group MyStay MyStay
Starting Price From $400/mo From $400/mo

IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) 有哪些 MyStay 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) 和 MyStay 共享 6 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Frontline Performance Group Frontline Performance Group MyStay MyStay
SOC 2 类型 2 认证(数据安全)
分割
多物业/连锁仪表盘
报价抑制与审批控制
提供绩效分析
数字受理与支付采集
服务流程编排(预订 → 到店前 → 到店后 → 入住期间 → 退房后)
礼品券和预付体验
绩效报告和报价分析

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Frontline Performance Group 对比 MyStay(按业务目标)

我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Frontline Performance Group The Regency Hotel Kuwait 小型
+ RevPAR Impact (All Products): 5.15%
+ RevPAR Impact (Rooms Only): 4.13%
+ Conversion Rate: 7.55%

"What I like about FPG's solution are the many facilities, including the mobile app, the detailed figures and the professional communication from the FPG team. The on-site training..."

Nader Al Omari
Nader Al Omari
Front Office Manager
MyStay MyStay

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

改善宾客体验
Frontline Performance Group Millennium Place Dubai Marina 小型
+ AED 5M Incremental Revenue Generated
+ #1 Ranked Millennium FPG Partner in MEA
+ Total RevPAR Increased to +7.24% in 2025

"FPG enabled a standardized upselling process, improved guest satisfaction, increased operational efficiency, user-friendly tool for Ambassadors, strong training and motivation."

R
Rakesh Kumar
Director of Front Office
MyStay MyStay

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Frontline Performance Group 对比 MyStay:总结

Frontline Performance Group
Frontline Performance Group
4.9/5 来自 95 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

追加销售跟踪与报告 78% 正面

该软件追踪追加销售和生成指标的功能经常因有助于提升销售业绩而受到好评。虽然许多用户认为它很有帮助,但也有一些用户指出,报告功能需要增强自定义选项。

易用性和集成性 100% 正面

用户称赞该软件界面友好,方便员工操作并与现有酒店系统集成。它简化了团队目标跟踪和追加销售等流程,并通过结构完善的平台提供直接访问。

绩效指标与目标设定 100% 正面

许多评论者都提到设定具体的团队和个人目标的好处。该软件的指标跟踪功能通常被认为是推动销售增长和提升责任感的关键因素。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

人工数据跟踪 100% 负面

尽管其具有全面的跟踪功能,但一些评论指出,自动数据更新偶尔会出现故障,导致团队不得不间歇性地手动跟踪追加销售指标。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #5 vs #11
中型(25-74 间客房) #9 vs #11
超大型(200+ 间客房) #5 vs #12
精品酒店 #9 vs #11

独特功能

多物业/连锁仪表盘 SOC 2 类型 2 认证(数据安全) 绩效报告和报价分析 报价抑制与审批控制 提供绩效分析
4.8/5 易用性 4.9/5 客户支持 3 个集成
查看资料
MyStay
MyStay
4.8/5 来自 45 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

定制和灵活性 88% 正面

有些用户要求在自动消息传递和内容呈现方面有更多自定义选项。他们希望在编辑模板和与多家酒店或特定 PMS 系统集成方面有更大的自由度。还要求基于语言的货币自... 有些用户要求在自动消息传递和内容呈现方面有更多自定义选项。他们希望在编辑模板和与多家酒店或特定 PMS 系统集成方面有更大的自由度。还要求基于语言的货币自定义和更多文本编辑选项。

与宾客沟通 92% 正面

用户强调在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通的能力。MyStay 提供自动消息传递和住宿及活动相关信息共享功能,打造个性化体验。此功能有助于及时... 用户强调在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通的能力。MyStay 提供自动消息传递和住宿及活动相关信息共享功能,打造个性化体验。此功能有助于及时满足客人需求并提高整体满意度。

高效的办理登机手续 96% 正面

MyStay 因其高效、快速的入住流程而广受好评。客人可以在抵达前在线办理入住手续,这节省了时间并减少了前台排队的情况。该流程包括电子签名和身份验证。此功能... MyStay 因其高效、快速的入住流程而广受好评。客人可以在抵达前在线办理入住手续,这节省了时间并减少了前台排队的情况。该流程包括电子签名和身份验证。此功能在疫情期间因其非接触式功能而特别受重视。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

与 PMS 集成 44% 负面

MyStay 与 PMS 系统的集成是一个关键问题。虽然许多人对这种集成表示赞赏,但有些用户遇到了困难并要求更顺畅的连接。与 PMS 更好地同步可以进一步提高平台的可... MyStay 与 PMS 系统的集成是一个关键问题。虽然许多人对这种集成表示赞赏,但有些用户遇到了困难并要求更顺畅的连接。与 PMS 更好地同步可以进一步提高平台的可用性和便利性。

排名更高的方面

长住酒店 #7 vs #13
其他 #9 vs #15
度假租赁与别墅 #7 vs #9
BE #3 vs #5

独特功能

分割 服务流程编排(预订 → 到店前 → 到店后 → 入住期间 → 退房后) 数字受理与支付采集
4.9/5 易用性 4.9/5 客户支持 30 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 MyStay 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)

关于 IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) 与 MyStay 的常见问题

IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) 能否替代 MyStay?

这取决于您的需求。IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) 和 MyStay 共享许多核心 Upselling Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 MyStay 提供 30 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyStay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) 或 MyStay 是否提供免费方案?

IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group):否。MyStay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Upselling Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) 和 MyStay?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Frontline Performance Group 的 HT Score 为 81,MyStay 的为 19。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息