The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 42 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
FranklyView 表现出色 .
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.3/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Friendly and Guest History.
基于 HTR 上 42 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 42 |
在分析了 42 条经验证的评价后,FranklyView 用户最看重其 ,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 用户界面和可用性, 报告和仪表板, 汇总反馈。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和仪表板
▾
|
|
|
+
汇总反馈
▾
|
|
|
+
与第三方软件集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
−
评论回复时间
▾
|
|
|
−
价格与价值
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 声誉管理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #19 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 16 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 8 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #7 13 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #7 18 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #7 12 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #13 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #9 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #12 15 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #5 6 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #3 9 条评价 |
Choosing between FranklyView and Shiji Reviewpro Reputation hinges on your hotel's specific needs, budget, and regional presence. Both platforms aim to boost your online reputation and guest engagement but approach these goals differently. FranklyView emphasizes direct guest interaction and feedback collection, while Shiji Reviewpro Reputation consolidates reviews from multiple platforms to provide operational insights.
Given the stark contrast in reviews, features, and global reach, your choice should align with whether you prioritize comprehensive reputation insights or targeted guest engagement. Are you looking for a broader reputation overview or a more personalized guest experience tool?
Shiji Reviewpro Reputation is the clear leader with over 40 reviews, a 3.83/5 overall rating, and recent feedback from users across multiple regions, making it more reliable for decision-making. Its extensive feature set, including AI review responses and benchmarking tools, surpasses FranklyView's limited offering.
If your hotel needs a mature, globally supported reputation management system with detailed analytics, go with Shiji Reviewpro Reputation. If your focus is on direct guest communication, pre-arrival engagement, and boosting reviews, FranklyView might appeal—though it lacks recent review data.
FranklyView primarily targets individual hotels focused on upselling, pre-registration, and post-stay feedback, making it suitable for properties emphasizing guest engagement and direct sales. In contrast, Shiji Reviewpro Reputation offers a centralized platform aggregating feedback from over 140 review sites, making it ideal for hotels that want to monitor and respond to online reputation at scale.
Your hotel should choose FranklyView if you're looking to increase direct bookings via guest feedback and targeted communication. Opt for Shiji Reviewpro if reputation management, benchmarking, and operational insights are your priorities. Do you need a tool for granular guest interaction or a broader reputation overview?
Shiji Reviewpro boasts a 4.15/5 ease of use rating, with many users praising its intuitive dashboard, real-time data, and active support. Reviewers appreciate its straightforward navigation and comprehensive reporting, often describing it as accessible even for less tech-savvy teams.
FranklyView, however, has an undisclosed ease of use rating but lacks recent reviews, making its usability assessment challenging. Given the more recent and detailed feedback for Shiji, the edge goes to Reviewpro for clarity and user-friendliness.
Shiji Reviewpro offers an extensive suite with 43 features, including AI-generated replies, sentiment analysis, guest history, multi-property management, and integrations with platforms like TripAdvisor, Google, and Booking.com. Its capabilities enable in-depth reputation monitoring, feedback analysis, and operational benchmarking.
FranklyView lacks additional features beyond its core guest feedback and upselling functions, making it more limited. For a feature-rich platform that covers a wide array of reputation management needs, the edge clearly favors Shiji Reviewpro.
Shiji Reviewpro's support scores 3.69/5, with recent reviews citing responsive assistance, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Some users mention delays but overall report a generally helpful support team.
FranklyView has no recent reviews or support data, making it impossible to assess. Considering the recent and detailed feedback for Shiji, the edge goes to Reviewpro for better support and onboarding experience.
Shiji Reviewpro integrates with 64 verified partners, including major PMS and RMS solutions like Oracle Hospitality, SiteMinder, Revinate, and Oaky. Its open API further allows customization and connection with various third-party tools, enhancing its operational utility.
FranklyView's three integrations, including Amadeus, are limited. For extensive connectivity and seamless platform integration, Reviewpro holds the advantage. Is your hotel relying on multiple software systems? If yes, Reviewpro is the better option.
Shiji Reviewpro has a higher overall rating at 3.83/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its dashboard usability and real-time data. Hotels across various segments, especially independent and brand hotels, rate it favorably, with some praising its benchmarking and response automation.
FranklyView lacks recent reviews and ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Based on available data, Reviewpro scores higher among hotelier users, especially for reputation management and operational insights.
FranklyView does not disclose pricing, likely indicating a bespoke quote or limited market presence. Shiji Reviewpro charges $900 per month as a base fee, with no visible discounts or flexible plans. There is no free trial offered for either platform.
If budget predictability is crucial, the transparent pricing of Reviewpro at $900/month provides clarity, but it might be costly for smaller hotels. FranklyView's unknown pricing requires direct inquiry, limiting upfront cost evaluation.
Hotels that prioritize direct guest engagement and upselling should consider FranklyView, especially those aiming to boost online reviews and repeat bookings through targeted feedback. Teams that want to proactively address guest concerns before they turn into negative reviews will find value here.
Not ideal if your hotel operates at a large scale or requires comprehensive reputation analytics, as FranklyView lacks features and recent reviews. Also, if your hotel seeks a global solution with extensive integrations, this platform may fall short.
Hotels aiming for a broad reputation overview, operational benchmarking, and guest feedback aggregation should select Reviewpro. It’s particularly suitable for large, multi-property groups or hotels in regions like North America, Europe, or Asia Pacific.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, independent, or operates solely in regions with limited support from Shiji. Smaller properties seeking a straightforward, low-cost review tool might find its extensive features unnecessary or expensive.
Shiji Reviewpro offers a comprehensive reputation management solution tailored for hotels seeking extensive review aggregation, analytics, and operational insights. Its broad feature set, integrations, and regional presence make it a solid choice for established properties and large hotel groups.
If your hotel needs a mature, proven platform with recent reviews, higher ratings, and the ability to benchmark against competitors, Reviewpro is the clear option. It is especially suitable if you want a system that consolidates your reputation data from multiple sources and offers actionable insights.
Conversely, FranklyView is better suited for hotels focused on direct guest communication, upselling, and generating reviews through personalized engagement. However, its limited recent feedback and features make it less compelling for most hotels seeking a comprehensive reputation solution.
Final recommendation: For most hotels, especially those looking for proven reputation tracking and extensive integrations, Shiji Reviewpro Reputation provides more reliable and recent data. Its higher ratings, broader feature set, and global presence give it a decisive edge.
声誉管理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,FranklyView 和 Shiji Reviewpro Reputation 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Facebook 信使集成 | ||
| 共享照片 | ||
| 安全数据保护 | ||
| 客人历史 | ||
| 短信短信 | ||
| 移动友好 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 31 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Our Guest Experience Specialist no longer spends valuable time manually monitoring and responding to feedback across multiple platforms."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该工具的用户界面因其简洁直观而广受好评。用户发现它易于导航,并且只需极少的配置即可使用,因此团队成员均可轻松使用。
许多用户都强调 ReviewPro 仪表板的用户友好性,称赞其全面性和易用性。仪表板提供了有价值的见解,并有助于跟踪关键绩效指标 (KPI),从而有助于做出更好的决策... 许多用户都强调 ReviewPro 仪表板的用户友好性,称赞其全面性和易用性。仪表板提供了有价值的见解,并有助于跟踪关键绩效指标 (KPI),从而有助于做出更好的决策。
用户对 ReviewPro 从多个平台和社交媒体渠道收集客户反馈的能力表示赞赏。这种聚合有助于他们及时了解其在线声誉,并促进有效的运营管理。该工具的集成和同步功... 用户对 ReviewPro 从多个平台和社交媒体渠道收集客户反馈的能力表示赞赏。这种聚合有助于他们及时了解其在线声誉,并促进有效的运营管理。该工具的集成和同步功能增强了其实用性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
ReviewPro 的客户支持质量好坏参半。虽然一些用户赞赏其快速的响应和主动的功能更新,但其他用户认为粗鲁和缺乏及时的支持是重大问题。
多条评论提到系统处理和显示客户评论回复存在延迟。这种延迟可能会扰乱工作流程并延迟关键的评论管理操作。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。FranklyView 和 Shiji Reviewpro Reputation 共享许多核心 Reputation Management 功能,但各有独特的能力。FranklyView 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Reviewpro Reputation 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Reviewpro Reputation 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.2/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
FranklyView:否。Shiji Reviewpro Reputation:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Reputation Management 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。FranklyView 的 HT Score 为 0,Shiji Group 的为 32。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问