The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #44 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #25 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #28 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 26 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #31 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #24 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Front2Go by Front2Go and Infor HMS by Infor hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both are property management systems (PMS), but they serve very different market segments and offer contrasting features, support, and user experiences. Your team must evaluate what matters most: recent reviews and proven performance or niche capabilities and integrations.
Front2Go has zero reviews and a score of 0/5, indicating no recent or verified customer feedback. In contrast, Infor HMS boasts 46 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.04/5, making it the more credible and tested option. Do you prioritize a product with proven user satisfaction or are you exploring an untested system?
Front2Go appears to be a less established or less reviewed PMS, with no recent reviews and no scores on key metrics. Its absence of features, integrations, and market presence suggests it’s still emerging or lacks broad deployment. On the other hand, Infor HMS is a mature, cloud-based platform with a robust feature set, including housekeeping, revenue management, and guest CRM, supported by 113 verified partners and regional presence in 13 countries.
Where Front2Go might appeal is if your hotel prioritizes a simplified or specialized solution, but its lack of recent customer feedback makes it difficult to assess real-world performance. Infor’s comprehensive suite and recent reviews demonstrate its reliability. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s operational complexity?
If your hotel needs a full-featured, scalable PMS capable of handling complex operations, Infor HMS is the clear choice. It suits mid-sized to large hotels, resorts, and brands looking for extensive integrations, detailed reporting, and multiple modules like housekeeping, revenue management, and CRM.
Conversely, if your hotel operates on a very limited scale or requires a lightweight, perhaps more niche solution, Front2Go could be considered—though its lack of recent feedback questions its viability. For most hotels seeking proven performance and reliable support, Infor offers a safer, more comprehensive investment.
Infor HMS scores a 3.88/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive navigation and short onboarding time—users mention it “was easy to understand” and “short onboarding process.” Support responsiveness is also highlighted positively, with many reviews citing “prompt and professional” assistance.
Front2Go, however, scores 0/5 on ease of use, with no reviews to substantiate its user interface or onboarding experience. Given its nonexistent recent feedback, we cannot assess its usability. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, including housekeeping modules, online support, guest profiles, multi-lingual and multi-currency capabilities, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audits. These features are well-documented through numerous reviews, emphasizing their importance for operational efficiency.
In contrast, Front2Go has no features listed or verified, suggesting it lacks key PMS functionalities. Without concrete features or reviews, Infor clearly outperforms Front2Go. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS receives consistent praise for its responsiveness, with a review highlighting “support team’s professionalism and quick replies,” rated 4.04/5 overall support score. Customers mention that support “guides through issues effectively,” which is critical during busy periods.
Front2Go, with no recent reviews available, provides no evidence of support quality. Its support reputation remains unknown, making Infor the safer choice. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified integrations, including booking channels (Expedia, Booking.com), revenue tools, and payment systems. Shared or unique integrations bolster its ability to connect with operational systems, reducing manual work and errors.
Front2Go offers no verified integrations, limiting its functionality and flexibility. For hotels relying on robust third-party integrations, Infor clearly leads. Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 recent reviews and an overall rating of 4.04/5, hoteliers clearly favor Infor HMS. Users from diverse segments, including independent hotels and brands, generally rate it highly, emphasizing its feature set and support.
Front2Go has no reviews, so there’s no rating data to consider. Until any feedback appears, we must consider Infor the more trusted and endorsed option. Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly available, indicating they likely require direct vendor contact for quotes. Many enterprise PMS solutions operate on custom pricing models based on hotel size and needs, so expect negotiations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Infor HMS provides a full-featured, well-supported PMS with proven recent reviews, high user satisfaction, and extensive integrations. Its suite is suited for hotels that want automation, detailed insights, and reliable support, making it a solid choice for mid to large properties.
Front2Go, with no recent reviews, offers little evidence of its capabilities or support quality. It might appeal to very small or specialized hotels seeking a basic solution, but without proven performance or features, it’s a risky investment.
In most cases, especially if your hotel values proven software backed by recent feedback, Infor HMS is the recommended choice. Its extensive features, regional coverage, and positive user ratings make it the more dependable and scalable solution.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Front2Go 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Front2Go 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Front2Go:否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Front2Go 的 HT Score 为 0,Infor 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问