The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 5 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 22 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 32 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #8 33 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #6 45 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #6 38 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #12 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #2 38 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #13 15 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #3 12 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #8 0 条评价 |
Your hotel’s choice between GraceSoft CRM and Hapi Guest hinges on your specific operational needs and strategic goals. GraceSoft offers a CRM tailored for property management businesses using Easy Innkeeping PMS, focusing on customer relationship management and automation. Hapi, on the other hand, is a data-centric platform that simplifies integrations across PMS and operational systems, with a strong emphasis on unified guest profiles and seamless data flow. Which of these solutions aligns best with your current priorities?
Both products aim to improve guest interactions and operational efficiency. GraceSoft’s strength lies in its specialized CRM features for property management, while Hapi’s core value is in integration and data unification. Do you prioritize streamlined guest communication or robust system connectivity?
If your hotel needs a dedicated CRM for managing guest relationships, automating communication, and increasing repeat reservations, GraceSoft is designed for that purpose, especially if you use Easy Innkeeping PMS. However, its limited features and non-existent recent reviews make it less appealing for hotels seeking ongoing support and proven performance.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a platform that consolidates guest data from multiple systems, supports detailed segmentation, and offers extensive integrations, Hapi is the more suitable choice. It boasts 60+ reviews, a high rating of 4.8/5, and recent positive feedback emphasizing ease of integration, speed, and customer support. Are you looking for a CRM that acts as a standalone solution or a system that connects your entire tech stack?
Hapi’s ease of use is rated 4.64/5 based on 60 recent reviews, with users highlighting its intuitive interface, fast deployment, and supportive onboarding process. Guests frequently mention how straightforward it is to set up and adopt, with many appreciating the quick results.
GraceSoft, with a 0/5 ease-of-use rating and no recent reviews, provides little insight into its user experience. Its historical lack of recent feedback suggests potential usability issues or limited ongoing support. Edge: Hapi.
Hapi offers more than 30 features, including data migration, automation, segmentation, email campaign tools, GDPR and CCPA compliance, and a wide array of integrations. GraceSoft’s feature set is not specified beyond basic CRM functionalities, suggesting it’s less comprehensive and less flexible.
Hapi’s extensive feature count and focus on multi-channel marketing, data management, and automation give it a significant advantage. GraceSoft appears to serve mainly as a simple CRM for Easy Innkeeping users, lacking the advanced tools found in Hapi. Edge: Hapi.
Hapi’s customer support scores 4.83/5, with reviews praising the team’s responsiveness, technical expertise, and proactive service. Users highlight how support is always available and fixes are addressed quickly, creating a strong partnership.
GraceSoft, with no recent reviews, provides no current data on support quality. Its support reputation is unverified, and the absence of recent feedback indicates it may have limited ongoing service. Edge: Hapi.
Hapi connects with over 66 verified partners, including major systems like Salesforce, Opera, and other operational tools, making it highly adaptable to hotel tech stacks. GraceSoft, with only 1 verified partner, offers minimal integration capabilities.
The breadth of Hapi’s integrations supports a more cohesive and automated hotel operation, especially for properties that rely on multiple systems. GraceSoft’s limited connectivity restricts its utility in complex environments. Edge: Hapi.
Based on the available data, Hapi’s 60 reviews with a 4.8/5 rating demonstrate strong hotel satisfaction, particularly among branded and resort properties. Recent reviews emphasize its quick deployment, ease of use, and excellent support.
GraceSoft’s ratings are nonexistent or outdated, making it impossible to gauge current hotel sentiment. The recent surge in Hapi reviews and high scores clearly position it as the preferred choice among hotels. Edge: Hapi.
Hapi charges a base fee of $1,400 per month, with no mention of additional setup or per-room charges. GraceSoft’s pricing is not publicly available, and it appears to lack transparent or flexible pricing options.
Given Hapi’s transparent pricing, your hotel can better evaluate ROI and budget planning. The lack of clear pricing from GraceSoft complicates a straightforward comparison. Edge: Hapi.
The fundamental difference between GraceSoft and Hapi lies in their core focus. GraceSoft’s CRM is tailored for property management and guest communication, offering limited features and no recent reviews, which diminishes its current relevance. Hapi, by contrast, emphasizes seamless data integration, automation, and a comprehensive feature set, with a proven track record backed by recent reviews and high ratings.
If your hotel’s strategy revolves around connecting your systems and leveraging guest data for marketing, Hapi’s extensive integrations, ease of use, and strong support make it the clear choice. Conversely, if your primary need is a simple CRM tied directly to Easy Innkeeping, GraceSoft might suffice but lacks the modern features and ongoing support you likely desire.
In summary, for most hotels aiming for operational efficiency, guest personalization, and future-proofing, Hapi offers a more comprehensive, well-supported solution. GraceSoft may still serve niche needs but falls short compared to Hapi’s proven capabilities and recent positive hotel feedback.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
营销自动化
|
|
|
| 个性化一对一沟通 | ||
| A/B 测试 | ||
| 营销自动化 | ||
| 电子邮件通讯 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
|
▾
模板生成器
|
|
|
| 模板编辑器 | ||
| 所见即所得 - HTML 编辑器 | ||
| 营销活动模板 | ||
| 事务模板 | ||
| 模板导入 | ||
|
▾
客人资料
|
|
|
| 客人资料 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| 符合CCPA | ||
| 自动重复数据删除 | ||
|
▾
分割
|
|
|
| 分割 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 标记 | ||
| 忠诚度细分 | ||
| 基于属性的细分 | ||
| 基于地理的细分 | ||
| 基于渠道/市场的细分 | ||
| 基于交付周期的细分 | ||
| 基于房间类型的细分 | ||
|
▾
隐私与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| 符合CCPA | ||
| PCI 投诉 | ||
|
▾
数据管理
|
|
|
| 集中式数据仓库 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 开放式 API | ||
| 集中式多酒店/多品牌解决方案 | ||
|
▾
反馈和调查
|
|
|
| 客人反馈模块(评论卡/评论) | ||
| Trip Advisor 连接合作伙伴 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
一些批评性反馈涉及 Hapi 需要将连接扩展到 PMS 之外的更多操作系统,包括桌面管理、CRM、POS 和 Spa 系统。
许多用户对实施阶段的快速高效支持表示赞赏。他们发现 Hapi 团队知识渊博、反应迅速,使集成过程顺利且轻松。不过,有些人建议在定制开发方面有所改进。
大多数用户强调,Hapi 简化了不同物业管理系统和第三方应用程序之间的集成,减少了与集成任务相关的时间和成本。它提供了统一的数据存储库,使酒店能够更快、更... 大多数用户强调,Hapi 简化了不同物业管理系统和第三方应用程序之间的集成,减少了与集成任务相关的时间和成本。它提供了统一的数据存储库,使酒店能够更快、更高效地部署技术。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户表示,Hapi 倾向于回避定制开发工作,这可能是特定酒店集成要求的限制。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Gracesoft CRM 和 Hapi Guest 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。Gracesoft CRM 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hapi Guest 提供 66 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Hapi Guest 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Gracesoft CRM:否。Hapi Guest:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GraceSoft 的 HT Score 为 0,Hapi 的为 31。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案