The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 30 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Great Stay App 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Messaging and Guest Profiles.
hub OS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 30 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 30 |
在分析了 30 条经验证的评价后,Great Stay App 用户最看重其 ,而 hub OS 用户则强调 部门间沟通, 维护管理, 用户界面 (ui)。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
部门间沟通
▾
|
|
|
+
维护管理
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面 (UI)
▾
|
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术故障
▾
|
|
|
−
移动无障碍
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #14 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #38 0 条评价 | #6 19 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #10 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #38 0 条评价 | #8 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #9 13 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #33 0 条评价 | #5 14 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #8 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #16 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #36 0 条评价 | #6 21 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #15 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #6 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Great Stay App by Great Stay App and Hub OS Guest in Touch hinges on your hotel's specific needs for guest communication and operational management. Both aim to enhance guest engagement, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. While Great Stay App emphasizes guest messaging and multi-lingual support, Hub OS focuses on contactless communication and operational efficiencies. How do you prioritize guest interaction versus operational streamlining?
Both products are designed to improve your team’s efficiency and guest satisfaction, but the strength of their reviews and recent feedback favors one over the other. The more recent and plentiful reviews for Hub OS suggest it has a clearer track record of performance and customer satisfaction. Can your hotel afford to rely on a newer, less-reviewed platform, or should you lean toward the more established option?
Great Stay App and Hub OS both target hotel guest apps, but they solve different core problems. Great Stay App focuses on delivering a comprehensive suite of guest communication features, including messaging, multi-lingual support, and mobile check-in/out—aimed at maximizing guest engagement and revenue. Conversely, Hub OS specializes in contactless, operational communication—facilitating maintenance, housekeeping, and incident reporting with real-time responsiveness.
While Great Stay App offers nine unique features, most are aimed at guest-facing interactions, with a heavy emphasis on personalization and convenience. Hub OS, however, concentrates on streamlining internal communications among staff and departments, which can directly impact operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Do you need a platform that directly enhances guest communication or one that optimizes your operational workflows?
If your hotel needs a guest app that drives engagement, provides multilingual support, and offers features like mobile check-in, payments, and guest messaging, Great Stay App is the better fit. Its focus on guest interaction and revenue driving features suits properties aiming to enhance direct communication and convenience. Its reviews are limited but consistent with positive mentions of user-friendliness.
If your team requires a solution that improves operational communication, maintenance management, and incident resolution—especially in contactless environments—Hub OS is the superior choice. Its larger review base (27 recent reviews) and high NPS score of 9.67/5 indicate strong customer satisfaction. It’s ideal for hotels prioritizing efficient inter-departmental workflows and guest service automation.
In short, choose Great Stay App if guest engagement is your priority, and opt for Hub OS if operational efficiency and internal communication take precedence.
Great Stay App’s reviews do not specify ease-of-use ratings, but the absence of recent feedback and the lack of detailed user comments suggest limited adoption or ongoing development. Meanwhile, Hub OS boasts a 4.87/5 rating for ease of use, with reviewers emphasizing its intuitive interface and straightforward operation across multiple departments.
Most users praise Hub OS’s mobile accessibility and simple reporting features, which support on-the-go management and real-time updates. Despite some occasional interface crashes, the overwhelming consensus favors Hub OS for ease of staff onboarding and daily use. Edge: Hub OS.
Great Stay App provides nine features exclusive to its platform, such as automatic translations, guest messaging, mobile check-in/out, and hotel directory—aimed at enhancing guest-facing service. Conversely, Hub OS offers no unique features but provides a broad suite of 23 verified integrations, including property management, revenue systems, and contactless solutions like HiJiffy and Mews.
Great Stay App’s features are highly tailored for guest communications, while Hub OS excels at operational management and integration capabilities. If your hotel requires extensive guest engagement tools, Great Stay App’s feature set is compelling. For comprehensive operational control, Hub OS’s integration network is superior. Edge: Hub OS.
Both products have limited but positive support reviews, with Hub OS’s recent feedback highlighting quick and proactive customer service rated at 4.74/5. Users mention that support teams resolve issues swiftly, which is critical for operational tools. Great Stay App, however, has no reviews in recent months, leaving its support quality less verifiable.
Given the recent review data, Hub OS’s support reputation is stronger, with users appreciating its responsiveness and assistance. If reliable support is crucial for your decision, Hub OS’s higher ratings give it an edge.
Hub OS enjoys a significant advantage in integrations, with 23 verified partners—including major property management systems, revenue platforms, and contactless solutions. Its shared integrations with products like Mews and Infor demonstrate a broad ecosystem. Great Stay App offers only two verified partners, RoomRaccoon and RUNNR.ai, limiting its connectivity.
If your hotel relies on multiple third-party systems, Hub OS’s extensive integrations ensure smoother operations and data flow. For a more standalone, guest-focused app with minimal integration needs, Great Stay App may suffice. Edge: Hub OS.
Hub OS’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 4.69/5 overall rating and a 97% likelihood to recommend based on 27 reviews. Hotels range from boutique to resorts, with many praising its operational improvements, especially in maintenance, housekeeping, and communication.
Great Stay App lacks recent reviews and has a 0/5 rating, indicating no current user feedback or active customer base. Given the quantity and recency of reviews, Hub OS’s ratings clearly surpass Great Stay App’s, confirming its stronger market credibility. Edge: Hub OS.
Pricing details for both products are unavailable, as they do not offer transparent or publicly listed costs. Both are marketed without trial options or clear subscription models, indicating that pricing may be bespoke or upon inquiry.
Your team will need to contact sales for quotes and consider the value of features, support, and integrations when negotiating.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on internal operations or needs extensive integration with property management systems.
Not ideal if your primary goal is guest-facing features like messaging or mobile check-in, or if your hotel operates on a very limited tech budget.
The core difference is that Great Stay App centers on guest communication, while Hub OS emphasizes operational management and internal communication. If your focus is on engaging guests and increasing direct bookings, Great Stay App’s features like guest messaging and mobile check-in are compelling. For hotels seeking to streamline maintenance, incident reporting, and department coordination, Hub OS’s extensive integrations and real-time tools are more suitable.
Choose Great Stay App if you need a guest engagement platform with multilingual support and messaging capabilities. Opt for Hub OS if operational efficiency, integration breadth, and staff communication are your priorities.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming for a proven, well-rated solution with recent reviews, Hub OS offers a more reliable and comprehensive platform. Great Stay App might work if your hotel's strategy is heavily guest-focused, but its limited recent feedback makes it a riskier choice at this stage.
Note: Due to the limited public details on pricing and implementation, your team should directly reach out to vendors for personalized quotes and further clarification.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Great Stay App 和 Hub OS Guest in Touch 共享 3 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 客人资料 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 当地推荐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 酒店目录 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Hub OS 在促进酒店各部门之间的沟通方面表现出色。评论强调了报告问题和在团队之间分配任务的便利性,从而促进了协调努力并改善了服务交付。此功能极大地增强了... Hub OS 在促进酒店各部门之间的沟通方面表现出色。评论强调了报告问题和在团队之间分配任务的便利性,从而促进了协调努力并改善了服务交付。此功能极大地增强了整体运营流程。
用户对 Hub OS 简化维护操作的能力表示赞赏。它提供快速报告和解决故障的功能,从而减少停机时间和运营效率低下。该软件允许团队实时跟踪和传达维护问题,从而更... 用户对 Hub OS 简化维护操作的能力表示赞赏。它提供快速报告和解决故障的功能,从而减少停机时间和运营效率低下。该软件允许团队实时跟踪和传达维护问题,从而更快地解决问题。
虽然许多用户认为 Hub OS 界面友好且外观精美,但有些人在使用过程中遇到了一些问题,例如偶尔崩溃或延迟。尽管存在这些问题,但用户仍然欣赏该软件如何简化复杂... 虽然许多用户认为 Hub OS 界面友好且外观精美,但有些人在使用过程中遇到了一些问题,例如偶尔崩溃或延迟。尽管存在这些问题,但用户仍然欣赏该软件如何简化复杂的任务。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常提到的一个问题是存在技术故障。这些包括同步延迟、偶尔崩溃和界面错误。虽然这些问题通常可以很快得到解决,但它们仍然会扰乱酒店运营。
Hub OS 的移动可访问性值得称赞,它使酒店员工能够随时随地管理运营。此功能对于报告问题和快速访问重要数据特别有用,从而节省时间并提高整体效率。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Great Stay App 和 Hub OS Guest in Touch 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Great Stay App 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hub OS Guest in Touch 提供 23 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Hub OS Guest in Touch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Great Stay App:否。Hub OS Guest in Touch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Great Stay App 的 HT Score 为 0,hub OS 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问