The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 84 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
GuestPoint 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Real Time Reporting and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
OpenHotel 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Multi-lingual and Digital Registration.
基于 HTR 上 84 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 26 | 58 |
在分析了 84 条经验证的评价后,GuestPoint 用户最看重其 用户友好性, 预订管理, 报告功能,而 OpenHotel 用户则强调 用户友好的pms, 持续更新和改进, 直接 ota 连接。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
+
用户友好的PMS
▾
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
+
持续更新和改进
▾
|
|
+
报告功能
▾
|
+
直接 OTA 连接
▾
|
|
+
系统可靠性
▾
|
+
认证过程
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
界面导航问题
▾
|
−
财务处理
▾
|
|
−
内部管理报告
▾
|
−
团体预订工具
▾
|
|
−
网上预订更新
▾
|
−
收益管理系统
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #29 23 条评价 | #25 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #54 2 条评价 | #39 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #50 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #21 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #39 11 条评价 | #37 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #57 1 条评价 | #45 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #41 4 条评价 | #28 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #25 6 条评价 | #43 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #14 54 条评价 |
Choosing between GuestPoint PMS by GuestPoint and OpenHotel PMS by OpenHotel hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but they approach the hotel management challenge differently. GuestPoint offers a more feature-rich, globally used platform, while OpenHotel emphasizes ease of use and robust integration capabilities. Your decision will depend on which aspects—features, support, ease of use—matter most for your property.
GuestPoint’s higher review count and recent feedback give it a slight edge in reliability and user confidence. But how do the two compare across key hotel management criteria? Let’s examine.
GuestPoint and OpenHotel are both property management systems designed to simplify hotel operations. GuestPoint’s platform excels in offering extensive features, especially around reporting, task management, and guest engagement tools, whereas OpenHotel focuses on user-friendliness and seamless integrations with OTAs.
GuestPoint’s broad feature set is particularly suited for mid-to-large properties needing complex management, while OpenHotel’s intuitive interface appeals to small and medium-sized hotels prioritizing ease of use. Do you need a highly customizable system or a straightforward, easy-to-implement solution?
GuestPoint’s review count stands at 25, with recent evaluations, making its data more reliable for decision-making. OpenHotel’s 57 reviews, with recent feedback, provide a strong current perspective on user satisfaction. Which of these reputations aligns better with your hotel’s operational goals?
If your hotel needs a feature-dense PMS with extensive reporting, task management, real-time updates, and integrated POS, GuestPoint is the clear choice. It’s best suited for properties that require detailed control over operations, especially if you value comprehensive guest messaging, automated reminders, and on-premise capabilities.
Conversely, if your hotel values ease of use, direct OTA connections, and intuitive group booking tools, OpenHotel aligns better with your needs. It’s ideal for small to medium properties that want efficient reservation handling, yield management, and a straightforward interface, especially if cost-effectiveness is a priority.
For properties that demand advanced features like PCI compliance, guest apps, and mobile check-in, GuestPoint’s 23 unique features give it a decisive advantage. If your operations are more modest or you’re new to PMS, OpenHotel’s simplicity and proven support might be more advantageous.
GuestPoint’s UI is rated at 5/5, with many users praising its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and straightforward training. Reviewers highlight that new staff can learn the system rapidly, and the onboarding process is smooth, with most finding it easy to adapt.
OpenHotel’s interface scores 4.71/5, with users describing it as user-friendly and effective for small to medium-sized teams. While some mention that the aesthetic appears somewhat dated, most report that navigating the system is uncomplicated, and onboarding is efficient.
Edge: GuestPoint.
GuestPoint offers 23 unique features, including real-time reporting, task management, PCI compliance, online check-in, automated reminders, and integrated CRS, significantly more than OpenHotel’s 2 exclusive features, which are multi-lingual support and digital registration.
OpenHotel’s standout features are its yield management, OTA integrations, and group booking tools, but these are fewer in number compared to GuestPoint’s extensive capabilities. GuestPoint’s broader feature set supports more complex, multi-faceted hotel operations.
Edge: GuestPoint.
Both products are highly rated for support, with GuestPoint receiving a perfect 5/5 and OpenHotel close behind at 4.82/5. GuestPoint’s reviews emphasize its 24/7 availability, knowledgeable staff, and quick problem resolution, with one user stating, “Their support is second to none, always helpful and patient.”
OpenHotel’s support is also praised for responsiveness and personalized service. Multiple users mention the support team’s helpfulness during system transitions and emergencies, with one noting, “Their team is very attentive and always ready to help.”
Edge: GuestPoint.
OpenHotel’s platform connects with 12 verified partners, compared to GuestPoint’s 7. Both systems share SiteMinder, but OpenHotel offers more integrations with OTAs, channel managers, and other third-party apps, including partners like RateGain and OpenKey.
GuestPoint’s integrations are fewer but include key partners such as Stripe and Goki, which serve essential functions like payments and lock management. If extensive integration options are a priority, OpenHotel’s broader network provides an advantage.
Edge: OpenHotel.
GuestPoint’s review score is 0/5, which appears to be an error, but overall satisfaction is reflected in its 25 reviews. However, the more recent, higher-rated reviews favor OpenHotel’s 4.81/5 score based on 57 reviews, with many hotel owners praising its ease of use and support.
OpenHotel’s user base includes a variety of property types, and reviews highlight its user-friendliness, particularly for small to medium properties. Its recent reviews reinforce its positive reputation.
Edge: OpenHotel.
GuestPoint charges a flat monthly fee of $200, with no implementation or trial fees. Pricing details for OpenHotel are not publicly disclosed, but it is described as competitively priced with no per-booking fees and transparent billing.
GuestPoint’s straightforward pricing makes budgeting easier, whereas OpenHotel’s flexible and transparent model is appealing for properties aiming for predictable costs. The lack of detailed OpenHotel pricing requires direct inquiry for precise comparisons.
GuestPoint offers a comprehensive, feature-rich PMS suitable for properties that require deep management capabilities and extensive customization. Its broad feature set and high support ratings make it ideal for larger or more complex hotels.
OpenHotel excels in user-friendliness, strong OTA integrations, and excellent support, making it a better fit for small to medium properties seeking an easy-to-use solution with reliable performance. Its more limited feature set is still sufficient for properties focused on core operations and seamless booking management.
If your hotel needs advanced management tools, detailed reports, and a robust platform, choose GuestPoint. But if ease of use, integration, and support are your priorities, OpenHotel is the smarter choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
OpenHotel
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,GuestPoint PMS 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享 21 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 费率管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 13 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
GuestPoint 提供的卓越客户支持一再被强调。支持团队全天候提供服务,知识渊博、耐心且能快速解决问题,这有助于保持平稳运营。
GuestPoint 因其直观的设计和用户友好的界面而广受好评,即使是新员工也可以轻松学习和使用。培训很简单,大多数用户发现它比旧系统有了显著的改进。
预订系统可有效防止超额预订并简化多间客房预订。用户对系统在轻松管理客房库存和预订方面的可靠性表示赞赏。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户报告了界面某些导航方面存在的挑战,例如搜索选项和快速更新,他们认为可以使其更加直观。
一些评论表明,虽然 GuestPoint 总体上是高效的,但可以改进内部管理报告,以便更好地管理工作流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在... 客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在旺季或系统转换期间。
许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由... 许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由于其灵活的预订网格和全面的布局,该系统对于中小型酒店尤其有效。
用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共... 用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共享,方便用户随时了解最新信息。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥... 虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥着不必要的信息,并建议进行改进以更好地满足他们的需求。
用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和... 用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和信用卡支付干预方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。GuestPoint PMS 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。GuestPoint PMS 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 OpenHotel PMS 提供 12 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。GuestPoint PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
GuestPoint PMS:否。OpenHotel PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GuestPoint 的 HT Score 为 16,OpenHotel 的为 16。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问