The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 912 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
GuestPoint 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.
Mews 表现出色 在 customization and flexibility 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 912 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $200/mo | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 26 | 886 |
在分析了 912 条经验证的评价后,GuestPoint 用户最看重其 客户支持, 用户友好性, 预订管理,而 Mews 用户则强调 customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, 入职和支持体验。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
+
入职和支持体验
▾
|
|
+
报告功能
▾
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
界面导航问题
▾
|
−
计费复杂性和报告局限性
▾
|
|
−
内部管理报告
▾
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
|
−
网上预订更新
▾
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #29 23 条评价 | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #54 2 条评价 | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #39 11 条评价 | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #57 1 条评价 | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #41 4 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #25 6 条评价 | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is a pivotal step for your hotel. Both GuestPoint and Mews aim to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and boost revenue. However, their features, support, and market presence diverge significantly, especially given the differing scales and needs of your property.
GuestPoint offers a simpler, more targeted solution with a strong focus on motels and small hotels, primarily in Australia and surrounding regions. Mews, on the other hand, serves a global audience with a broader feature set and a larger user base, especially in boutique and independent hotels.
Are you seeking a highly adaptable, extensive platform for a growing or multi-property operation? Or do you prefer a straightforward, reliable solution tailored for smaller motels? The choice hinges on your scale and strategic goals.
GuestPoint is designed to serve motels and small hotels, emphasizing ease of use and customer support. Its cloud-based platform integrates reservations, channel management, GDS, payments, and POS, all from a single vendor, making it ideal for properties prioritizing simplicity and efficiency.
Mews caters to a wide variety of hotel types, from boutique to large chains, with a focus on automation, extensive integrations, and scalability. It supports multi-property management with centralized rate updates, advanced revenue tools, and over 1,000 third-party integrations via its marketplace.
GuestPoint’s 25 reviews, mostly recent, reveal high satisfaction with usability and support, with glowing comments about their support team. Mews’s 758 reviews showcase a mature, widely adopted system favored for automation and flexibility, with recent feedback emphasizing its ongoing innovation and extensive ecosystem.
The question is whether your hotel benefits from a more specialized, regional focus or needs a globally scalable platform. Do you prioritize a simple, stable system or an adaptable, feature-rich environment?
If your hotel operates as a small to medium motel or RV park, particularly in Australia or similar regions, GuestPoint’s flat $200 monthly fee and all-in-one platform suit your needs. Its user-friendly design and dedicated support make onboarding straightforward for smaller teams.
Conversely, if your property is a boutique, independent, or multi-property hotel seeking automation, extensive integrations, and scalability, Mews’s $900 monthly fee is justified. Its broad feature set—guest CRM, multi-currency, online check-in, and over 1,000 integrations—appeals to properties aiming for growth, efficiency, and a modern guest experience.
In essence, choose GuestPoint for regional motels that prefer simplicity and support; opt for Mews if your hotel needs advanced automation, flexibility, and global reach.
GuestPoint’s intuitive, cloud-based interface consistently receives 5/5 ratings for ease of use, with users praising its straightforward setup and operation. Training and onboarding are rated highly at 4.88/5, and customers emphasize how quickly staff adopt the system.
Mews, with a 4.7/5 usability rating, also earns praise for its modern, clean interface that minimizes training time. Its onboarding experience, rated 4.39/5, is generally positive, though some users note occasional initial setup challenges.
Edge: GuestPoint. Its focus on simplicity and dedicated support makes it slightly easier for small teams or less tech-savvy staff to navigate.
GuestPoint offers 43 shared features with Mews but stands out with one unique feature: on-premise management, suited for properties needing local control. It also includes robust reservation management, channel distribution, GDS, payments, and POS—all in one platform.
Mews provides 16 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual, multi-currency support, guest CRM, online registration, tablet check-in, GDPR compliance, and SOC2 certification. Its advanced automation, guest profiling, and extensive API ecosystem surpass GuestPoint’s offerings.
While GuestPoint covers essential PMS functions, Mews’s broader and more advanced feature set makes it the superior choice for scalability and innovation.
Edge: Mews, for its extensive suite of advanced, exclusive features that support dynamic hotel environments.
GuestPoint’s 5/5 customer support and onboarding ratings reflect high satisfaction, with reviews highlighting their 24/7 availability and knowledgeable staff. Customers specifically mention the support team’s helpfulness in getting new users up to speed and resolving issues quickly.
Mews’s support, rated 4.27/5, is generally praised, but some reviews mention occasional bugs and slower resolutions. Still, its support team is responsive, and frequent updates improve user experience.
Edge: GuestPoint. Its dedicated, round-the-clock support tailored to smaller properties ensures quicker, more personalized assistance.
GuestPoint integrates with 7 verified partners, including industry staples like STAAH, SiteMinder, Stripe, and Bakuun. Its limited but targeted integrations serve small to medium properties well.
Mews shines with 336 verified partners, including Criton, Sage, Orange Hotel Marketing, and dozens of other industry-specific solutions. Its open API and extensive marketplace enable deep customization and integration across a broad tech ecosystem.
Edge: Mews. Its extensive integration network offers unmatched flexibility and future-proofing for tech-savvy, growing hotels.
GuestPoint, with no recent reviews and only 25, all from the same region, lacks sufficient data to gauge user satisfaction comprehensively. Many reviews are highly positive, especially praising customer support and usability.
Mews, rated 4.62/5 from 758 reviews, receives high marks across segments, notably boutique hotels (4.91/5) and independent hotels (4.64/5). Recent reviews emphasize its automation, innovation, and scalability.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Mews’s ratings are more reliable and demonstrate broader satisfaction among diverse property types.
Edge: Mews, with a large, recent review base confirming high overall hotel satisfaction.
GuestPoint’s pricing is straightforward at $200/month with no implementation, freemium, or hidden fees—ideal for small properties needing predictability.
Mews’s base cost is $900/month, also without implementation or hidden costs. Its higher price matches its broader feature set and scalability but may be a stretch for budget-conscious small hotels.
In summary, GuestPoint offers a more affordable, predictable investment, whereas Mews’s price reflects its extensive capabilities.
Not ideal if your hotel plans to scale rapidly or needs multi-property management.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, regional solution or has minimal tech infrastructure.
GuestPoint excels as a user-friendly, regional-focused PMS for small motels and inns, especially in Australia and similar markets. Its simple setup, strong support, and predictable pricing make it ideal for small teams prioritizing reliability over complex features.
Mews is a comprehensive, scalable platform suited for modern hotels seeking automation, extensive integrations, and growth. Its vast ecosystem, advanced features, and global presence make it the clear choice for properties aiming for operational excellence at scale.
If your hotel is a small regional property with straightforward needs, GuestPoint’s simplicity and support are your best bet. For hotels seeking a future-proof, flexible tech environment with room to grow, Mews’s extensive features and integrations are unmatched.
In conclusion, if recent reviews and a broader user base matter, Mews’s proven track record and higher ratings make it the preferred choice for most evolving hotels.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,GuestPoint PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享 43 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 客户关系管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 5 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
GuestPoint 提供的卓越客户支持一再被强调。支持团队全天候提供服务,知识渊博、耐心且能快速解决问题,这有助于保持平稳运营。
GuestPoint 因其直观的设计和用户友好的界面而广受好评,即使是新员工也可以轻松学习和使用。培训很简单,大多数用户发现它比旧系统有了显著的改进。
预订系统可有效防止超额预订并简化多间客房预订。用户对系统在轻松管理客房库存和预订方面的可靠性表示赞赏。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户报告了界面某些导航方面存在的挑战,例如搜索选项和快速更新,他们认为可以使其更加直观。
一些评论表明,虽然 GuestPoint 总体上是高效的,但可以改进内部管理报告,以便更好地管理工作流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了... Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了问题解决率和用户满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Mews 可以自动计费,但用户反映其复杂性以及报告和分析方面的局限性造成了困扰。改进这些方面可以为管理财务运营的用户提供更深入的洞察和更大的灵活性。
Mews 凭借其集成功能为收益管理提供了强大的基础,但用户指出,动态定价工具和高级分析方面还有改进的空间,尤其是在多物业运营方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。GuestPoint PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。GuestPoint PMS 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。GuestPoint PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
GuestPoint PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GuestPoint 的 HT Score 为 16,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问