The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Okanda |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #14 5 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #10 22 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Okanda |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 33 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 45 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 38 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #12 3 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Okanda |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 38 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #13 15 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 12 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #8 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Hapi Guest by Hapi and Olakala Suite by Okanda hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both products aim to streamline customer feedback and improve guest engagement, but they approach this goal from different angles. Hapi emphasizes deep integration capabilities and a comprehensive CRM platform, while Okanda focuses on feedback collection and sentiment analysis. Do you prioritize robust system connectivity or feedback insights?
Hapi’s extensive review base and recent positive feedback give it a notable edge. With 60 reviews in the last six months and a 4.8/5 overall rating, your team can trust its proven track record. Okanda, by contrast, has no recent reviews or detailed feedback, making it a less certain choice for decision-makers seeking current, reliable data.
If your hotel needs a unified guest profile that aggregates data from multiple property systems, Hapi clearly fits the bill. Its features include data migration, guest segmentation, and a centralized data warehouse, making it ideal for larger or multi-property hotels that want to leverage extensive integrations. Conversely, if your primary focus is gathering and analyzing guest feedback quickly to enhance satisfaction, Olakala Suite may seem appealing. However, without recent reviews or detailed feature data, it’s hard to confirm its effectiveness.
For hotels with complex operational systems that require advanced data management, Hapi’s 66 verified integrations and 30 unique features make it the superior choice. If your hotel has minimal integration needs but seeks to understand customer sentiments better, Olakala might be worth exploring — though the lack of confirmation on its current capabilities makes it a less reliable option.
Hapi boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.64/5, supported by onboarding ratings of 4.67/5 and glowing reviews about its straightforward implementation. Users highlight its user-friendly interface, quick deployment, and supportive onboarding process, making staff adoption smoother. On the other hand, Olakala provides no publicly available ratings or recent reviews, leaving its usability unverified.
Given the detailed praise for Hapi’s intuitive design and support, your team can expect minimal friction during setup and daily use. The absence of recent feedback about Olakala’s interface or onboarding suggests it may not be as user-friendly or widely adopted, so edge: Hapi.
Hapi offers an extensive suite of 30 features, including guest profiles, segmentation, automation, GDPR compliance, and email marketing tools—features critical for targeted marketing and data management. Olakala, by comparison, provides no publicly documented features or unique capabilities, making it impossible to assess its feature set confidently.
Hapi’s detailed feature list demonstrates its focus on personalized communication, data integrity, and automation, giving your team more tools for effective guest engagement. Without confirmed features or recent reviews, Olakala remains an unverified contender, making the clear edge: Hapi.
Hapi’s support scores are exceptional, with a 4.83/5 rating and positive review comments praising the knowledgeable, responsive team. Users describe Hapi support as prompt, professional, and integral to smooth implementations. In contrast, Olakala offers no recent review data or support ratings, leaving its customer service quality unverified.
Given the importance of reliable support in SaaS adoption, your team can confidently favor Hapi’s proven track record. The lack of user feedback on Olakala’s support makes it a riskier choice—edge: Hapi.
Hapi outperforms with 66 verified partners, including integrations with major systems like 4SUITES, Juyo Analytics, and WebRezPro. Its open API and extensive partner network facilitate connecting your existing property management and operational tools. Olakala provides no documented integrations or partner data, raising questions about its connectivity.
If your hotel relies on multiple systems or plans to expand its tech stack, Hapi’s integrations are a significant advantage. Without known integrations, Olakala is unlikely to meet complex connectivity needs—edge: Hapi.
Hapi’s reviews, totaling 60 in the past six months, reveal an overall rating of 4.8/5, with a 96% likelihood to recommend and a high NPS score of 9.58/5. Users in various segments, including branded hotels and resorts, praise its ease of use, support, and feature set. Olakala lacks recent reviews, making it impossible to determine current user sentiment.
The recent, detailed feedback about Hapi underscores its strong reputation among hoteliers. Its high ratings across different property types demonstrate broader trust and satisfaction—edge: Hapi.
Hapi’s pricing starts at $1,400 per month, with no free tier or trial available. Its clear pricing structure supports budgeting and planning. Olakala provides no publicly available pricing information, making it difficult to compare costs or assess value.
For hotels seeking predictable expenses and transparency, Hapi’s published pricing is advantageous. The absence of cost data for Olakala poses uncertainty, so Hapi’s price transparency is a decisive benefit—edge: Hapi.
Hapi’s extensive features and integrations make it best suited for larger, technologically advanced hotels or chains wanting to elevate their guest experience through data. Smaller hotels with basic needs might find it overly complex or costly.
Given the lack of recent reviews and detailed feature info, Olakala seems better suited for hotels looking for basic feedback tools rather than complex CRM or data management.
Hapi offers a comprehensive, integrated platform tailored for hotels seeking a unified view of guest data, robust automation, and extensive system connections. Its features, support, and recent reviews strongly support its suitability for hotels of all sizes looking to enhance marketing and operational insights.
Choose Hapi if you need a proven, scalable CRM solution with a wide array of features, integrations, and top-notch support. It’s ideal for multi-property hotels, brands, and those aiming to leverage data for personalized guest experiences.
Olakala, on the other hand, seems focused on feedback collection and sentiment analysis but lacks recent validation of its capabilities, support, and integrations. If your hotel’s only priority is basic guest feedback and you are comfortable with unverified performance, it might be worth a trial—though the lack of recent reviews makes it a riskier choice.
For most hotels, especially those seeking reliability and comprehensive features, Hapi is the safer, more proven option. Its recent review volume and high ratings confirm its standing as a leader in hotel CRM and email marketing solutions.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
一些批评性反馈涉及 Hapi 需要将连接扩展到 PMS 之外的更多操作系统,包括桌面管理、CRM、POS 和 Spa 系统。
许多用户对实施阶段的快速高效支持表示赞赏。他们发现 Hapi 团队知识渊博、反应迅速,使集成过程顺利且轻松。不过,有些人建议在定制开发方面有所改进。
大多数用户强调,Hapi 简化了不同物业管理系统和第三方应用程序之间的集成,减少了与集成任务相关的时间和成本。它提供了统一的数据存储库,使酒店能够更快、更... 大多数用户强调,Hapi 简化了不同物业管理系统和第三方应用程序之间的集成,减少了与集成任务相关的时间和成本。它提供了统一的数据存储库,使酒店能够更快、更高效地部署技术。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户表示,Hapi 倾向于回避定制开发工作,这可能是特定酒店集成要求的限制。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hapi Guest 和 Olakala Suite 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hapi Guest 提供 65 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Olakala Suite 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Hapi Guest 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hapi Guest:否。Olakala Suite:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hapi 的 HT Score 为 31,Okanda 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问