The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #60 1 条评价 | #20 35 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #35 10 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #52 0 条评价 | #40 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #60 1 条评价 | #27 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #18 33 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #56 1 条评价 | #39 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #34 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #40 1 条评价 | #64 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #34 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Hilton OnQ by Hilton and Semper depends on your hotel’s operational needs and growth plans. Hilton OnQ is a proprietary system built specifically for Hilton properties, while Semper is a versatile, cloud-based PMS that appeals to a broader range of hotel types. Both aim to streamline management but diverge sharply in user experience, features, and support. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s future?
Hilton OnQ is designed exclusively for Hilton’s extensive franchise network, offering tight integration within Hilton’s ecosystem but limited outside its own properties. Semper, by contrast, is a flexible platform used by various property types, from boutique hotels to resorts, with a focus on ease of use and broad integration. Both platforms aim to improve operational efficiency—yet Hilton’s system feels outdated and less user-friendly, whereas Semper emphasizes modern, intuitive workflows. Do you want a system tied to a specific brand or a flexible, multi-property solution?
If your hotel seeks a user-friendly, modern solution with robust features like integrated payments, automated reporting, and extensive third-party integrations, Semper is the clear choice. It’s suitable for hotels across segments, especially those prioritizing ease of use, support, and revenue management. Conversely, Hilton OnQ might be suitable if your hotel is part of Hilton’s franchise network and prefers a system optimized for Hilton-specific processes, despite its outdated interface. For most hotels, Semper’s recent reviews and high NPS score favor it as the more reliable and adaptable option.
Hilton OnQ scores a mere 1/5 for ease of use, with consistent reports of clunky interfaces and an outdated design. Staff often spend excessive time troubleshooting due to its antiquated architecture, as one reviewer noted, “Hilton’s entire tech stack was built in the 90s, and it shows.” Meanwhile, Semper boasts a 4.55/5 rating for ease, praised for its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal training requirements. Users highlight how seamlessly they can navigate workflows. Edge: Semper.
Semper offers a staggering 94 features including direct billing, integrated POS, online check-in/out, guest messaging, revenue management, and multi-currency support—many of which are absent in Hilton OnQ. Hilton’s system remains limited, lacking modern capabilities like automated reminders, online checkout, and comprehensive guest profiles. Semper’s extensive feature set allows for more automation and guest engagement, providing a clear advantage. Edge: Semper.
Hilton’s support ranks at 1/5, with reviews indicating significant frustrations due to limited responsiveness and outdated infrastructure. One review sarcastically notes, “I love spending hours with Hilton’s tech support because their PMS doesn’t work.” In contrast, Semper’s support scores an impressive 4.88/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness, professionalism, and knowledgeable staff—“Bea and Zizipho went beyond to help me fix issues.” Edge: Semper.
Semper offers 11 verified integrations, including popular platforms like Sage, Cloudbeds, and Revinate, facilitating extensive automation and data sharing. Hilton OnQ has only 6 verified partners, mainly focused on Hilton-specific solutions like Impulsify and Canary Technologies. This limits Hilton’s ability to connect with third-party tools, whereas Semper’s broader integration footprint supports diverse operational needs. Edge: Semper.
Given Hilton OnQ’s near-zero ratings and lack of recent reviews, it’s impossible to gauge current satisfaction—reviewers are uniformly critical. Semper, with 51 reviews and a 9.33/5 NPS, is rated highly across property types, especially resorts and boutique hotels. Hotels appreciate Semper’s ease of use and support, leading to a 94% likelihood of recommendation. In short, Semper clearly commands higher user satisfaction. Edge: Semper.
Hilton OnQ does not publicly disclose pricing, but as a proprietary Hilton system, it’s typically included in franchise agreements without an explicit fee. Semper charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no indication of setup costs or hidden fees. For budget-conscious hotels or those seeking transparent pricing, Semper’s straightforward model is advantageous.
Hilton OnQ is a proprietary system tailored solely for Hilton properties, with limited features and outdated technology. It may suit Hilton franchisees but falls short for independent or multi-property operators seeking modern functionalities. Semper, with its broad feature set, high satisfaction ratings, and extensive integrations, is better suited for most hotels outside Hilton’s ecosystem.
If you need a modern, flexible platform that actively supports your operational growth, Semper is the recommended choice. Its recent reviews and high NPS indicate a product that resonates with hoteliers demanding efficiency and support. Conversely, Hilton OnQ might only be appropriate if your hotel is directly tied to Hilton’s brand and operational requirements.
In summary, unless you are a Hilton franchisee, Semper’s superior usability, features, and support make it the more compelling option for your hotel’s management needs.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Semper 支持团队因其响应能力、知识和乐于助人而受到高度赞扬。用户对问题的快速解决以及团队的专业和友好态度表示赞赏。特别提到了 Bea、Zizipho 和 Melani 等... Semper 支持团队因其响应能力、知识和乐于助人而受到高度赞扬。用户对问题的快速解决以及团队的专业和友好态度表示赞赏。特别提到了 Bea、Zizipho 和 Melani 等团队成员,强调了卓越的客户服务。
许多评论者称赞 Semper 的界面友好且易于使用,即使是经过最低限度培训的新员工也能轻松上手。直观的日历布局、便捷的导航和简化的工作流程等功能提高了其整体的... 许多评论者称赞 Semper 的界面友好且易于使用,即使是经过最低限度培训的新员工也能轻松上手。直观的日历布局、便捷的导航和简化的工作流程等功能提高了其整体的用户友好性。然而,一些人提到,虽然该系统用户友好,但其视觉设计似乎过时了。
培训和易学性 Semper 受到好评。用户发现该系统的教程和入门支持很有帮助,并且赞赏新员工能够因为其简单性而快速掌握该系统。一些评论建议提供更多的培训机会会... 培训和易学性 Semper 受到好评。用户发现该系统的教程和入门支持很有帮助,并且赞赏新员工能够因为其简单性而快速掌握该系统。一些评论建议提供更多的培训机会会很有帮助。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对 Semper 提供的附加功能非常满意,例如开放式餐桌功能、各种盘点选项以及上传客人照片的功能。定制请求包括更具体的报告类别、创建独特报告的功能以及进一... 用户对 Semper 提供的附加功能非常满意,例如开放式餐桌功能、各种盘点选项以及上传客人照片的功能。定制请求包括更具体的报告类别、创建独特报告的功能以及进一步开发某些功能,例如颜色编码和用户分配以解决错误。
Semper 的综合报告和会计功能被强调为酒店管理的宝贵工具。定制报告有助于库存控制、预算和财务监督。用户发现自动响应和多种报告选项对业务运营有益。改进建议... Semper 的综合报告和会计功能被强调为酒店管理的宝贵工具。定制报告有助于库存控制、预算和财务监督。用户发现自动响应和多种报告选项对业务运营有益。改进建议包括更多定制报告类别和改进 Excel 输出。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hilton OnQ 和 Semper 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hilton OnQ 提供 6 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Semper 提供 11 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Semper 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 1.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hilton OnQ:否。Semper:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hilton 的 HT Score 为 0,Semper 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问